123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14616206)
1. Comparison of indirect CsI/a:Si and direct a:Se digital radiography. An assessment of contrast and detail visualization.
Fischbach F; Freund T; Pech M; Werk M; Bassir C; Stoever B; Felix R; Ricke J
Acta Radiol; 2003 Nov; 44(6):616-21. PubMed ID: 14616206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Flat panel digital radiography compared with storage phosphor computed radiography: assessment of dose versus image quality in phantom studies.
Fischbach F; Ricke J; Freund T; Werk M; Spors B; Baumann C; Pech MJ; Felix R
Invest Radiol; 2002 Nov; 37(11):609-14. PubMed ID: 12393973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Amorphous silicon, flat-panel, x-ray detector versus storage phosphor-based computed radiography: contrast-detail phantom study at different tube voltages and detector entrance doses.
Hamer OW; Völk M; Zorger Z; Feuerbach S; Strotzer M
Invest Radiol; 2003 Apr; 38(4):212-20. PubMed ID: 12649645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contrast-detail phantom study for x-ray spectrum optimization regarding chest radiography using a cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector.
Hamer OW; Völk M; Zorger N; Borisch I; Büttner R; Feuerbach S; Strotzer M
Invest Radiol; 2004 Oct; 39(10):610-8. PubMed ID: 15377940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of an amorphous silicon/cesium iodide flat-panel digital chest radiography system with screen/film and computed radiography systems--a contrast-detail phantom study.
Rong XJ; Shaw CC; Liu X; Lemacks MR; Thompson SK
Med Phys; 2001 Nov; 28(11):2328-35. PubMed ID: 11764040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Chest radiography with a large-area detector based on cesium-iodide/amorphous-silicon technology: image quality and dose requirement in comparison with an asymmetric screen-film system.
Strotzer M; Völk M; Reiser M; Lenhart M; Manke C; Gmeinwieser J; Holzknecht N; Link J; Feuerbach S
J Thorac Imaging; 2000 Jul; 15(3):157-61. PubMed ID: 10928606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Simulated bone erosions in a hand phantom: detection with conventional screen-film technology versus cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector.
Strotzer M; Völk M; Wild T; von Landenberg P; Feuerbach S
Radiology; 2000 May; 215(2):512-5. PubMed ID: 10796933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of low-contrast detail perception on storage phosphor radiographs and digital flat panel detector images.
Peer S; Neitzel U; Giacomuzzi SM; Peer R; Gassner E; Steingruber I; Jaschke W
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Mar; 20(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 11341713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Chest radiography with a flat-panel detector: image quality with dose reduction after copper filtration.
Hamer OW; Sirlin CB; Strotzer M; Borisch I; Zorger N; Feuerbach S; Völk M
Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):691-700. PubMed ID: 16192324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of radiographic techniques on the low-contrast detail detectability performance of digital radiography systems.
Alsleem H; U P; Mong KS; Davidson R
Radiol Technol; 2014; 85(6):614-22. PubMed ID: 25002641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Image quality and radiation dose on digital chest imaging: comparison of amorphous silicon and amorphous selenium flat-panel systems.
Bacher K; Smeets P; Vereecken L; De Hauwere A; Duyck P; De Man R; Verstraete K; Thierens H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Sep; 187(3):630-7. PubMed ID: 16928923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection of simulated chest lesions with normal and reduced radiation dose: comparison of conventional screen-film radiography and a flat-panel x-ray detector based on amorphous silicon.
Strotzer M; Gmeinwieser JK; Völk M; Fründ R; Seitz J; Feuerbach S
Invest Radiol; 1998 Feb; 33(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 9493725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Digital flat image detector technique based on cesium iodide and amorphous silicon: experimental studies and initial clinical results].
Strotzer M; Gmeinwieser J; Völk M; Fründ R; Feuerbach S
Rofo; 1999 Jan; 170(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 10071647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical evaluation of digital radiography based on a large-area cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector compared with screen-film radiography for skeletal system and abdomen.
Okamura T; Tanaka S; Koyama K; Norihumi N; Daikokuya H; Matsuoka T; Kishimoto K; Hatagawa M; Kudoh H; Yamada R
Eur Radiol; 2002 Jul; 12(7):1741-7. PubMed ID: 12111065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A-Si:H/CsI(Tl) flat-panel versus computed radiography for chest imaging applications: image quality metrics measurement.
Liu X; Shaw CC
Med Phys; 2004 Jan; 31(1):98-110. PubMed ID: 14761026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Image quality vs. radiation dose for a flat-panel amorphous silicon detector: a phantom study.
Geijer H; Beckman KW; Andersson T; Persliden J
Eur Radiol; 2001; 11(9):1704-9. PubMed ID: 11511892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Routine chest radiography using a flat-panel detector: image quality at standard detector dose and 33% dose reduction.
Strotzer M; Völk M; Fründ R; Hamer O; Zorger N; Feuerbach S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jan; 178(1):169-71. PubMed ID: 11756114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Amorphous silicon, flat-panel, x-ray detector: reliability of digital image fusion regarding angle and distance measurements in long-leg radiography.
Hamer OW; Strotzer M; Zorger N; Paetzel C; Lerch K; Feuerbach S; Völk M
Invest Radiol; 2004 May; 39(5):271-6. PubMed ID: 15087721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dose reduction in skeletal and chest radiography using a large-area flat-panel detector based on amorphous silicon and thallium-doped cesium iodide: technical background, basic image quality parameters, and review of the literature.
Völk M; Hamer OW; Feuerbach S; Strotzer M
Eur Radiol; 2004 May; 14(5):827-34. PubMed ID: 14968260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
