123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14616206)
21. Image quality and radiation dose in planar imaging - Image quality figure of merits from the CDRAD phantom.
Konst B; Weedon-Fekjaer H; Båth M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jul; 20(7):151-159. PubMed ID: 31152576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. An investigation into the validity of utilising the CDRAD 2.0 phantom for optimisation studies in digital radiography.
Al-Murshedi S; Hogg P; England A
Br J Radiol; 2018 Sep; 91(1089):20180317. PubMed ID: 29906239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Amorphous silicon, flat-panel, x-ray detector versus screen-film radiography: effect of dose reduction on the detectability of cortical bone defects and fractures.
Strotzer M; Gmeinwieser J; Spahn M; Völk M; Fründ R; Seitz J; Spies V; Alexander J; Feuerbach S
Invest Radiol; 1998 Jan; 33(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 9438507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Image quality and exposure dose in digital projection radiography].
Busch HP; Busch S; Decker C; Schilz C
Rofo; 2003 Jan; 175(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 12525978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Optimization of the chest exposure condition with a contrast-detail phantom: evaluation of the flat-panel versus computed radiography systems].
Kinoshita E; Umezu Y; Ogawa K; Katou T; Arimura H; Yoshikawa H; Higashida Y; Ooki M; Toyofuku F
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Jul; 60(7):969-74. PubMed ID: 15340278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Radiation dose reduction in chest radiography using a flat-panel amorphous silicon detector.
Hosch WP; Fink C; Radeleff B; kampschulte a A; Kauffmann GW; Hansmann J
Clin Radiol; 2002 Oct; 57(10):902-7. PubMed ID: 12413914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Digital radiography of the skeleton using a large-area detector based on amorphous silicon technology: image quality and potential for dose reduction in comparison with screen-film radiography.
Völk M; Strotzer M; Holzknecht N; Manke C; Lenhart M; Gmeinwieser J; Link J; Reiser M; Feuerbach S
Clin Radiol; 2000 Aug; 55(8):615-21. PubMed ID: 10964733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Digital chest radiography with a solid-state flat-panel x-ray detector: contrast-detail evaluation with processed images printed on film hard copy.
Chotas HG; Ravin CE
Radiology; 2001 Mar; 218(3):679-82. PubMed ID: 11230639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Physical imaging properties and low-contrast performance of a newly developed flat-panel digital radiographic system.
Matsumoto M; Yamazaki T; Nokita M; Hayashida S; Yoshida A; Ideguchi T; Himuro K; Ohki M; Kumazawa S; Higashida Y
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Dec; 61(12):1656-65. PubMed ID: 16395242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Image quality and detection performance of a direct digital radiography system].
Ideguchi T; Matsuda K; Himuro K; Kuwahara R; Miyazaki H; Hazeyama H; Kumazawa S; Kawaji Y; Yoshida A; Matsumoto M; Higashida Y
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2006 Mar; 62(3):425-33. PubMed ID: 16604048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Correlation between physical measurements and observer evaluations of image quality in digital chest radiography.
Yalcin A; Olgar T; Sancak T; Atac GK; Akyar S
Med Phys; 2020 Sep; 47(9):3935-3944. PubMed ID: 32427360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Chest imaging with flat-panel detector at low and standard doses: comparison with storage phosphor technology in normal patients.
Herrmann A; Bonél H; Stäbler A; Kulinna C; Glaser C; Holzknecht N; Geiger B; Schätzl M; Reiser F
Eur Radiol; 2002 Feb; 12(2):385-90. PubMed ID: 11870439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Should 3K zoom function be used for detection of pneumothorax in cesium iodide/amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiographs presented on 1K-matrix soft copies?
Herrmann KA; Bonél HM; Stäbler A; Voelk M; Strotzer M; Zech CJ; Reiser MF
Eur Radiol; 2006 Dec; 16(12):2768-74. PubMed ID: 16896703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Diagnostic performance of a flat-panel detector at low tube voltage in chest radiography: a phantom study.
Bernhardt TM; Rapp-Bernhardt U; Lenzen H; Röhl FW; Diederich S; Papke K; Ludwig K; Heindel W
Invest Radiol; 2004 Feb; 39(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 14734924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Contrast-detail evaluation and dose assessment of eight digital chest radiography systems in clinical practice.
Veldkamp WJ; Kroft LJ; Boot MV; Mertens BJ; Geleijns J
Eur Radiol; 2006 Feb; 16(2):333-41. PubMed ID: 16132918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Full-field digital mammography with amorphous silicon-based flat- panel detector: physical imaging characteristics and signal detection].
Ideguchi T; Higashida Y; Himuro K; Ohki M; Nakamura S; Yoshida A; Takagi R; Hatano H; Kuwahara R; Toyonaga M; Tanaka I; Toyofuku F
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Mar; 60(3):399-405. PubMed ID: 15131510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Microcalcification detectability for four mammographic detectors: flat-panel, CCD, CR, and screen/film).
Rong XJ; Shaw CC; Johnston DA; Lemacks MR; Liu X; Whitman GJ; Dryden MJ; Stephens TW; Thompson SK; Krugh KT; Lai CJ
Med Phys; 2002 Sep; 29(9):2052-61. PubMed ID: 12349926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Characterization of a clinical unit for digital radiography based on irradiation side sampling technology.
Rivetti S; Lanconelli N; Bertolini M; Nitrosi A; Burani A
Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101902. PubMed ID: 24089904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Impact of resolution and noise characteristics of digital radiographic detectors on the detectability of lung nodules.
Saunders RS; Samei E; Hoeschen C
Med Phys; 2004 Jun; 31(6):1603-13. PubMed ID: 15259665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
