These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14616206)
61. Optimization of chest radiographic imaging parameters: a comparison of image quality and entrance skin dose for digital chest radiography systems. Sun Z; Lin C; Tyan Y; Ng KH Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 22726965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Imaging performance with different doses in skeletal radiography: comparison of a needle-structured and a conventional storage phosphor system with a flat-panel detector. Wirth S; Treitl M; Reiser MF; Körner M Radiology; 2009 Jan; 250(1):152-60. PubMed ID: 19001150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Comparison of eight different digital chest radiography systems: variation in detection of simulated chest disease. Kroft LJ; Veldkamp WJ; Mertens BJ; Boot MV; Geleijns J AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Aug; 185(2):339-46. PubMed ID: 16037503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. A comparison of digital radiography systems in terms of effective detective quantum efficiency. Bertolini M; Nitrosi A; Rivetti S; Lanconelli N; Pattacini P; Ginocchi V; Iori M Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2617-27. PubMed ID: 22559632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Flat detectors and their clinical applications. Spahn M Eur Radiol; 2005 Sep; 15(9):1934-47. PubMed ID: 15806363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Optimization of a flat-panel based real time dual-energy system for cardiac imaging. Ducote JL; Xu T; Molloi S Med Phys; 2006 Jun; 33(6):1562-8. PubMed ID: 16872063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Introduction of a New Parameter for Evaluation of Digital Radiography System Performance. Choopani MR; Chaparian A J Med Signals Sens; 2020; 10(3):196-200. PubMed ID: 33062611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. A real-time flat-panel X-ray pixel imaging system for low-dose medical diagnostics and craniofacial applications. Chapuy S; Dimcovski D; Dimcovski Z; Grigoriev E; Grob E; Ligier Y; Pachoud M; Riondel F; Rüfenacht D; Sayegh C; Terrier F; Valley JF; Verdun FR J Craniofac Surg; 2000 Jan; 11(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 11314093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Digital radiography versus conventional radiography in chest imaging: diagnostic performance of a large-area silicon flat-panel detector in a clinical CT-controlled study. Garmer M; Hennigs SP; Jäger HJ; Schrick F; van de Loo T; Jacobs A; Hanusch A; Christmann A; Mathias K AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jan; 174(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 10628458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Radiation dose in digital chest radiography: comparison among three technologies. Saiani F; Ghirardi C; Rodella CA; Feroldi P; Chiesa A Radiol Med; 2004 Apr; 107(4):401-7. PubMed ID: 15103291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography at different exposure doses versus mammography film: possibility of radiation dose reduction in detecting rheumatologic bone defects. Zähringer M; Reineck S; Perniok A; Krüger K; Andermahr J; Rubbert A; Winnekendonk G Acta Radiol; 2008 Mar; 49(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 18300139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Effects of optimization and image processing in digital chest radiography: an ROC study with an anthropomorphic phantom. Kheddache S; Månsson LG; Angelhed JE; Denbratt L; Gottfridsson B; Schlossman D Eur J Radiol; 1991; 13(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 1743193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. An alternate line erasure and readout (ALER) method for implementing slot-scan imaging technique with a flat-panel detector--initial experiences. Liu X; Shaw CC; Altunbas MC; Wang T IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Apr; 25(4):496-502. PubMed ID: 16608064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Using a flat-panel detector in high resolution cone beam CT for dental imaging. Baba R; Ueda K; Okabe M Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 15585803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Detective quantum efficiency measured as a function of energy for two full-field digital mammography systems. Marshall NW Phys Med Biol; 2009 May; 54(9):2845-61. PubMed ID: 19384004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Segmented crystalline scintillators: empirical and theoretical investigation of a high quantum efficiency EPID based on an initial engineering prototype CsI(TI) detector. Sawant A; Antonuk LE; El-Mohri Y; Zhao Q; Wang Y; Li Y; Du H; Perna L Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1053-66. PubMed ID: 16696482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Indirect flat-panel detector with avalanche gain: fundamental feasibility investigation for SHARP-AMFPI (scintillator HARP active matrix flat panel imager). Zhao W; Li D; Reznik A; Lui BJ; Hunt DC; Rowlands JA; Ohkawa Y; Tanioka K Med Phys; 2005 Sep; 32(9):2954-66. PubMed ID: 16266110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and effective dose using four digital systems. Pascoal A; Lawinski CP; Mackenzie A; Tabakov S; Lewis CA Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):273-7. PubMed ID: 15933121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Optimal beam quality for chest flat panel detector system: realistic phantom study. Kuwahara C; Aoki T; Oda N; Kawabata J; Sugimoto K; Kobayashi M; Fujii M; Korogi Y Eur Radiol; 2019 Sep; 29(9):4538-4543. PubMed ID: 30737566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. [Direct digital magnification mammography with a large-surface detector made of amorphous silicon]. Hermann KP; Hundertmark C; Funke M; von Brenndorff A; Grabbe E Rofo; 1999 May; 170(5):503-6. PubMed ID: 10370416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]