These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14616206)

  • 81. Contrast-detail analysis of three flat panel detectors for digital radiography.
    Borasi G; Samei E; Bertolini M; Nitrosi A; Tassoni D
    Med Phys; 2006 Jun; 33(6):1707-19. PubMed ID: 16872078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Digital chest radiography with a selenium-based flat-panel detector versus a storage phosphor system: comparison of soft-copy images.
    Goo JM; Im JG; Kim JH; Seo JB; Kim TS; Shine SJ; Lee W
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Oct; 175(4):1013-8. PubMed ID: 11000155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. Impact of Software Parameter Settings on Image Quality of Virtual Grid Processed Radiography Images: A Contrast-Detail Phantom Study.
    Gossye T; Smeets PV; Achten E; Bacher K
    Invest Radiol; 2020 Jun; 55(6):374-380. PubMed ID: 31985603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. Clinical application of a flat-panel X-ray detector based on amorphous silicon technology: image quality and potential for radiation dose reduction in skeletal radiography.
    Strotzer M; Gmeinwieser J; Völk M; Fründ R; Seitz J; Manke C; Albrich H; Feuerbach S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jul; 171(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 9648757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. Varied tube potential with constant effective dose at lumbar spine radiography using a flat-panel digital detector.
    Geijer H; Persliden J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):240-5. PubMed ID: 15933115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Optimizing the tube potential for lumbar spine radiography with a flat-panel digital detector.
    Geijer H; Norrman E; Persliden J
    Br J Radiol; 2009 Jan; 82(973):62-8. PubMed ID: 19095816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. Grid removal and impact on population dose in full-field digital mammography.
    Gennaro G; Katz L; Souchay H; Klausz R; Alberelli C; di Maggio C
    Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):547-55. PubMed ID: 17388172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. An improved method for flat-field correction of flat panel x-ray detector.
    Kwan AL; Seibert JA; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2006 Feb; 33(2):391-3. PubMed ID: 16532945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. Comparison of different commercial FFDM units by means of physical characterization and contrast-detail analysis.
    Rivetti S; Lanconelli N; Campanini R; Bertolini M; Borasi G; Nitrosi A; Danielli C; Angelini L; Maggi S
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4198-209. PubMed ID: 17153399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. Scan equalization digital radiography (SEDR) implemented with an amorphous selenium flat-panel detector: initial experience.
    Liu X; Lai CJ; Chen L; Han T; Zhong Y; Shen Y; Wang T; Shaw CC
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Nov; 54(22):6959-78. PubMed ID: 19887717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. [Variation in X-ray dose quantity using an amorphous selenium based flat-panel detector -- a study on the dose reduction rate up to the limit of diagnostical utilization].
    Lehnert T; Wohlers J; Streng W; Manegold K; Wetter A; Jacobi V; Mack MG; Vogl TJ
    Rofo; 2006 Mar; 178(3):278-86. PubMed ID: 16508834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. Digital chest radiography with a large-area flat-panel silicon X-ray detector: clinical comparison with conventional radiography.
    Hennigs SP; Garmer M; Jaeger HJ; Classen R; Jacobs A; Gissler HM; Christmann A; Mathias K
    Eur Radiol; 2001; 11(9):1688-96. PubMed ID: 11511890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. Image quality for five modern chest radiography techniques: a modified FROC study with an anthropomorphic chest phantom.
    Månsson LG; Kheddache S; Lanhede B; Tylén U
    Eur Radiol; 1999; 9(9):1826-34. PubMed ID: 10602958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Correlation of contrast-detail analysis and clinical image quality assessment in chest radiography with a human cadaver study.
    De Crop A; Bacher K; Van Hoof T; Smeets PV; Smet BS; Vergauwen M; Kiendys U; Duyck P; Verstraete K; D'Herde K; Thierens H
    Radiology; 2012 Jan; 262(1):298-304. PubMed ID: 22056687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Cascaded systems analysis of a-Se/a-Si and a-InGaZnO TFT passive and active pixel sensors for tomosynthesis.
    Sengupta A; Zhao C; Konstantinidis A; Kanicki J
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jan; 64(2):025012. PubMed ID: 30523916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. Comparison of image quality among three X-ray systems for chest radiography: first step in optimisation.
    Nocetti D; Ubeda C; Calcagno S; Acevedo J; Pardo D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):386-91. PubMed ID: 25821212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. [Evaluation of Detectability for Patient's Movement in Portable Chest Radiography: Comparison of Visual Detection and Motion Detection Software].
    Ono T; Ichikawa H; Kato T
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2022 Aug; 78(8):838-845. PubMed ID: 35793953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. Image Quality Evaluation of a Digital Radiography System Made in Thailand.
    Techavipoo U; Sinsuebphon N; Prompalit S; Thongvigitmanee S; Narkbuakaew W; Kiang-Ia A; Srivongsa T; Thajchayapong P; Chaumrattanakul U
    Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():3102673. PubMed ID: 34869760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. Study of digital mammographic equipments by phantom image quality.
    Mayo P; Rodenas F; Verdú G; Campayo JM; Villaescusa JI
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():1994-6. PubMed ID: 17946081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. Effectiveness of adjusting radiographic technique parameters on image quality in direct digital radiography: a systematic review protocol.
    Steffensen C; Trypis G; Mander GTW; Munn Z
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2019 Oct; 17(10):2165-2173. PubMed ID: 31305289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.