146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14617240)
1. Improvement in quality of colorectal cancer pathology reporting with a standardized proforma--a comparative study.
Beattie GC; McAdam TK; Elliott S; Sloan JM; Irwin ST
Colorectal Dis; 2003 Nov; 5(6):558-62. PubMed ID: 14617240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Deficiencies in pathological reporting of colorectal cancer in Victoria.
Winn RD; Robinson DR; Farmer KC; Bell SW
ANZ J Surg; 2008 Sep; 78(9):796-9. PubMed ID: 18844912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The use of a proforma improves colorectal cancer pathology reporting.
Rigby K; Brown SR; Lakin G; Balsitis M; Hosie KB
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1999 Nov; 81(6):401-3. PubMed ID: 10655894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reporting colorectal cancer.
Quirke P; Morris E
Histopathology; 2007 Jan; 50(1):103-12. PubMed ID: 17204025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Histopathology reporting in colorectal cancer: a proforma improves quality.
Siriwardana PN; Pathmeswaran A; Hewavisenthi J; Deen KI
Colorectal Dis; 2009 Oct; 11(8):849-53. PubMed ID: 19740157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Histopathological report of colorectal carcinoma resections: A 5-year audit in Lagos.
Badmos KB; Rotimi O; Lawal AO; Osinowo AO; Habeebu MY; Abdulkareem FB
Niger Postgrad Med J; 2018; 25(1):32-36. PubMed ID: 29676343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A survey of reporting of colorectal cancer in Scotland: compliance with guidelines and effect of proforma reporting.
Woods YL; Mukhtar S; McClements P; Lang J; Steele RJ; Carey FA
J Clin Pathol; 2014 Jun; 67(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 24567415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of standard protocol implementation on the quality of colorectal cancer pathology reporting.
Ihnát P; Delongová P; Horáček J; Ihnát Rudinská L; Vávra P; Zonča P
World J Surg; 2015 Jan; 39(1):259-65. PubMed ID: 25234197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Improving the quality of histopathological examination of colorectal cancer specimens through standard protocol implementation].
Ihnát P; Delongová P; Dvořáčková J; Horáček J; Vávra P; Martínek L; Guňková P; Pelikán A; Zonča P
Rozhl Chir; 2013 Dec; 92(12):703-7. PubMed ID: 24479515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Colorectal cancer pathology reporting: a regional audit.
Bull AD; Biffin AH; Mella J; Radcliffe AG; Stamatakis JD; Steele RJ; Williams GT
J Clin Pathol; 1997 Feb; 50(2):138-42. PubMed ID: 9155695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Variance of surgeons versus pathologists in staging of colorectal cancer.
Jha MK; Corbett WA; Wilson RG; Koreli A; Papagrigoriadis S
Minerva Chir; 2006 Oct; 61(5):385-91. PubMed ID: 17159746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does the caseload of the pathologist influence the minimum and extended data set of pathology variables reported for rectal adenocarcinoma?
Hatzidis ; Solomon ; Schnitzler ; Cartmill ; Loder ; Chapuis
Colorectal Dis; 2000 Jan; 2(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 23577931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of implementing synoptic pathology reporting in cancer diagnosis: a systematic review.
Sluijter CE; van Lonkhuijzen LR; van Slooten HJ; Nagtegaal ID; Overbeek LI
Virchows Arch; 2016 Jun; 468(6):639-49. PubMed ID: 27097810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The use of a standard proforma in breast cancer reporting.
Mathers ME; Shrimankar J; Scott DJ; Charlton FG; Griffith CD; Angus B
J Clin Pathol; 2001 Oct; 54(10):809-11. PubMed ID: 11577136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors that influence the adequacy of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
Jeyarajah S; Sutton CD; Miller AS; Hemingway D;
Colorectal Dis; 2007 Nov; 9(9):808-15. PubMed ID: 17441969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pathological reporting of malignant colorectal polyps.
Gillespie C; Merrie A; Bissett I
N Z Med J; 2013 Sep; 126(1382):78-86. PubMed ID: 24154772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Comprehensive Study of Extramural Venous Invasion in Colorectal Cancer.
McClelland D; Murray GI
PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0144987. PubMed ID: 26671331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The implementation of guidelines and computerised forms improves the completeness of cancer pathology reporting. The CROPS project: a randomised controlled trial in pathology.
Branston LK; Greening S; Newcombe RG; Daoud R; Abraham JM; Wood F; Dallimore NS; Steward J; Rogers C; Williams GT
Eur J Cancer; 2002 Apr; 38(6):764-72. PubMed ID: 11937309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Template reporting matters--a nationwide study on histopathology reporting on colorectal carcinoma resections.
Haugland HK; Casati B; Dørum LM; Bjugn R
Hum Pathol; 2011 Jan; 42(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 20869747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pathological reporting of colorectal cancer specimens: a retrospective survey in an academic Canadian pathology department.
Chan NG; Duggal A; Weir MM; Driman DK
Can J Surg; 2008 Aug; 51(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 18815652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
