Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14617240)

  • 1. Improvement in quality of colorectal cancer pathology reporting with a standardized proforma--a comparative study.
    Beattie GC; McAdam TK; Elliott S; Sloan JM; Irwin ST
    Colorectal Dis; 2003 Nov; 5(6):558-62. PubMed ID: 14617240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Deficiencies in pathological reporting of colorectal cancer in Victoria.
    Winn RD; Robinson DR; Farmer KC; Bell SW
    ANZ J Surg; 2008 Sep; 78(9):796-9. PubMed ID: 18844912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of a proforma improves colorectal cancer pathology reporting.
    Rigby K; Brown SR; Lakin G; Balsitis M; Hosie KB
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1999 Nov; 81(6):401-3. PubMed ID: 10655894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reporting colorectal cancer.
    Quirke P; Morris E
    Histopathology; 2007 Jan; 50(1):103-12. PubMed ID: 17204025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Histopathology reporting in colorectal cancer: a proforma improves quality.
    Siriwardana PN; Pathmeswaran A; Hewavisenthi J; Deen KI
    Colorectal Dis; 2009 Oct; 11(8):849-53. PubMed ID: 19740157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Histopathological report of colorectal carcinoma resections: A 5-year audit in Lagos.
    Badmos KB; Rotimi O; Lawal AO; Osinowo AO; Habeebu MY; Abdulkareem FB
    Niger Postgrad Med J; 2018; 25(1):32-36. PubMed ID: 29676343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A survey of reporting of colorectal cancer in Scotland: compliance with guidelines and effect of proforma reporting.
    Woods YL; Mukhtar S; McClements P; Lang J; Steele RJ; Carey FA
    J Clin Pathol; 2014 Jun; 67(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 24567415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of standard protocol implementation on the quality of colorectal cancer pathology reporting.
    Ihnát P; Delongová P; Horáček J; Ihnát Rudinská L; Vávra P; Zonča P
    World J Surg; 2015 Jan; 39(1):259-65. PubMed ID: 25234197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Improving the quality of histopathological examination of colorectal cancer specimens through standard protocol implementation].
    Ihnát P; Delongová P; Dvořáčková J; Horáček J; Vávra P; Martínek L; Guňková P; Pelikán A; Zonča P
    Rozhl Chir; 2013 Dec; 92(12):703-7. PubMed ID: 24479515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Colorectal cancer pathology reporting: a regional audit.
    Bull AD; Biffin AH; Mella J; Radcliffe AG; Stamatakis JD; Steele RJ; Williams GT
    J Clin Pathol; 1997 Feb; 50(2):138-42. PubMed ID: 9155695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variance of surgeons versus pathologists in staging of colorectal cancer.
    Jha MK; Corbett WA; Wilson RG; Koreli A; Papagrigoriadis S
    Minerva Chir; 2006 Oct; 61(5):385-91. PubMed ID: 17159746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does the caseload of the pathologist influence the minimum and extended data set of pathology variables reported for rectal adenocarcinoma?
    Hatzidis ; Solomon ; Schnitzler ; Cartmill ; Loder ; Chapuis
    Colorectal Dis; 2000 Jan; 2(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 23577931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of implementing synoptic pathology reporting in cancer diagnosis: a systematic review.
    Sluijter CE; van Lonkhuijzen LR; van Slooten HJ; Nagtegaal ID; Overbeek LI
    Virchows Arch; 2016 Jun; 468(6):639-49. PubMed ID: 27097810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use of a standard proforma in breast cancer reporting.
    Mathers ME; Shrimankar J; Scott DJ; Charlton FG; Griffith CD; Angus B
    J Clin Pathol; 2001 Oct; 54(10):809-11. PubMed ID: 11577136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors that influence the adequacy of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
    Jeyarajah S; Sutton CD; Miller AS; Hemingway D;
    Colorectal Dis; 2007 Nov; 9(9):808-15. PubMed ID: 17441969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pathological reporting of malignant colorectal polyps.
    Gillespie C; Merrie A; Bissett I
    N Z Med J; 2013 Sep; 126(1382):78-86. PubMed ID: 24154772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Comprehensive Study of Extramural Venous Invasion in Colorectal Cancer.
    McClelland D; Murray GI
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0144987. PubMed ID: 26671331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The implementation of guidelines and computerised forms improves the completeness of cancer pathology reporting. The CROPS project: a randomised controlled trial in pathology.
    Branston LK; Greening S; Newcombe RG; Daoud R; Abraham JM; Wood F; Dallimore NS; Steward J; Rogers C; Williams GT
    Eur J Cancer; 2002 Apr; 38(6):764-72. PubMed ID: 11937309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Template reporting matters--a nationwide study on histopathology reporting on colorectal carcinoma resections.
    Haugland HK; Casati B; Dørum LM; Bjugn R
    Hum Pathol; 2011 Jan; 42(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 20869747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pathological reporting of colorectal cancer specimens: a retrospective survey in an academic Canadian pathology department.
    Chan NG; Duggal A; Weir MM; Driman DK
    Can J Surg; 2008 Aug; 51(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 18815652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.