These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14617240)

  • 1. Improvement in quality of colorectal cancer pathology reporting with a standardized proforma--a comparative study.
    Beattie GC; McAdam TK; Elliott S; Sloan JM; Irwin ST
    Colorectal Dis; 2003 Nov; 5(6):558-62. PubMed ID: 14617240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Deficiencies in pathological reporting of colorectal cancer in Victoria.
    Winn RD; Robinson DR; Farmer KC; Bell SW
    ANZ J Surg; 2008 Sep; 78(9):796-9. PubMed ID: 18844912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of a proforma improves colorectal cancer pathology reporting.
    Rigby K; Brown SR; Lakin G; Balsitis M; Hosie KB
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1999 Nov; 81(6):401-3. PubMed ID: 10655894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reporting colorectal cancer.
    Quirke P; Morris E
    Histopathology; 2007 Jan; 50(1):103-12. PubMed ID: 17204025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Histopathology reporting in colorectal cancer: a proforma improves quality.
    Siriwardana PN; Pathmeswaran A; Hewavisenthi J; Deen KI
    Colorectal Dis; 2009 Oct; 11(8):849-53. PubMed ID: 19740157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Histopathological report of colorectal carcinoma resections: A 5-year audit in Lagos.
    Badmos KB; Rotimi O; Lawal AO; Osinowo AO; Habeebu MY; Abdulkareem FB
    Niger Postgrad Med J; 2018; 25(1):32-36. PubMed ID: 29676343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A survey of reporting of colorectal cancer in Scotland: compliance with guidelines and effect of proforma reporting.
    Woods YL; Mukhtar S; McClements P; Lang J; Steele RJ; Carey FA
    J Clin Pathol; 2014 Jun; 67(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 24567415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of standard protocol implementation on the quality of colorectal cancer pathology reporting.
    Ihnát P; Delongová P; Horáček J; Ihnát Rudinská L; Vávra P; Zonča P
    World J Surg; 2015 Jan; 39(1):259-65. PubMed ID: 25234197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Improving the quality of histopathological examination of colorectal cancer specimens through standard protocol implementation].
    Ihnát P; Delongová P; Dvořáčková J; Horáček J; Vávra P; Martínek L; Guňková P; Pelikán A; Zonča P
    Rozhl Chir; 2013 Dec; 92(12):703-7. PubMed ID: 24479515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Colorectal cancer pathology reporting: a regional audit.
    Bull AD; Biffin AH; Mella J; Radcliffe AG; Stamatakis JD; Steele RJ; Williams GT
    J Clin Pathol; 1997 Feb; 50(2):138-42. PubMed ID: 9155695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variance of surgeons versus pathologists in staging of colorectal cancer.
    Jha MK; Corbett WA; Wilson RG; Koreli A; Papagrigoriadis S
    Minerva Chir; 2006 Oct; 61(5):385-91. PubMed ID: 17159746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does the caseload of the pathologist influence the minimum and extended data set of pathology variables reported for rectal adenocarcinoma?
    Hatzidis ; Solomon ; Schnitzler ; Cartmill ; Loder ; Chapuis
    Colorectal Dis; 2000 Jan; 2(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 23577931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of implementing synoptic pathology reporting in cancer diagnosis: a systematic review.
    Sluijter CE; van Lonkhuijzen LR; van Slooten HJ; Nagtegaal ID; Overbeek LI
    Virchows Arch; 2016 Jun; 468(6):639-49. PubMed ID: 27097810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use of a standard proforma in breast cancer reporting.
    Mathers ME; Shrimankar J; Scott DJ; Charlton FG; Griffith CD; Angus B
    J Clin Pathol; 2001 Oct; 54(10):809-11. PubMed ID: 11577136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors that influence the adequacy of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
    Jeyarajah S; Sutton CD; Miller AS; Hemingway D;
    Colorectal Dis; 2007 Nov; 9(9):808-15. PubMed ID: 17441969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pathological reporting of malignant colorectal polyps.
    Gillespie C; Merrie A; Bissett I
    N Z Med J; 2013 Sep; 126(1382):78-86. PubMed ID: 24154772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The implementation of guidelines and computerised forms improves the completeness of cancer pathology reporting. The CROPS project: a randomised controlled trial in pathology.
    Branston LK; Greening S; Newcombe RG; Daoud R; Abraham JM; Wood F; Dallimore NS; Steward J; Rogers C; Williams GT
    Eur J Cancer; 2002 Apr; 38(6):764-72. PubMed ID: 11937309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Template reporting matters--a nationwide study on histopathology reporting on colorectal carcinoma resections.
    Haugland HK; Casati B; Dørum LM; Bjugn R
    Hum Pathol; 2011 Jan; 42(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 20869747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pathological reporting of colorectal cancer specimens: a retrospective survey in an academic Canadian pathology department.
    Chan NG; Duggal A; Weir MM; Driman DK
    Can J Surg; 2008 Aug; 51(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 18815652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Completeness of low anterior resection pathology report: a hospital-based audit with recommendations on improving reporting.
    Nambiar A; Vivek N; Bindu MR; Sudheer OV; Bai L
    Indian J Cancer; 2010; 47(2):156-9. PubMed ID: 20448379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.