741 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14618033)
1. The RACE study in perspective of randomized studies on management of persistent atrial fibrillation.
Hagens VE; Van Gelder IC; Crijns HJ;
Card Electrophysiol Rev; 2003 Jun; 7(2):118-21. PubMed ID: 14618033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risks and benefits of rate control versus maintenance of sinus rhythm.
Saxonhouse SJ; Curtis AB
Am J Cardiol; 2003 Mar; 91(6A):27D-32D. PubMed ID: 12670639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rate versus rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation: what the trials really say.
Crijns HJ
Drugs; 2005; 65(12):1651-67. PubMed ID: 16060699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Confounding factors in rate versus rhythm control trials in patients with atrial fibrillation: lessons from the strategies of treatment of atrial fibrillation (STAF) pilot study.
Carlsson J; Boos C
Card Electrophysiol Rev; 2003 Jun; 7(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 14618034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rate-control versus conversion strategy in postoperative atrial fibrillation: trial design and pilot study results.
Lee JK; Klein GJ; Krahn AD; Yee R; Zarnke K; Simpson C; Skanes A
Card Electrophysiol Rev; 2003 Jun; 7(2):178-84. PubMed ID: 14618047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Atrial fibrillation: rate control often better than rhythm control.
Prescrire Int; 2004 Apr; 13(70):64-9. PubMed ID: 15148984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Some recent randomized clinical trials in the management of atrial fibrillation.
Wyse DG
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2003 Oct; 9(2):223-8. PubMed ID: 14574035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Antiarrhythmics for maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.
Lafuente-Lafuente C; Valembois L; Bergmann JF; Belmin J
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Mar; (3):CD005049. PubMed ID: 25820938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rhythm control versus rate control in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. Results of the HOT CAFE Polish Study.
Opolski G; Torbicki A; Kosior D; Szulc M; Zawadzka M; Pierścińska M; Kołodziej P; Stopiński M; Wozakowska-Kapłon B; Achremczyk P; Rabczenko D
Kardiol Pol; 2003 Jul; 59(7):1-16; discussion 15-16. PubMed ID: 14560344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with recurrent persistent atrial fibrillation.
Van Gelder IC; Hagens VE; Bosker HA; Kingma JH; Kamp O; Kingma T; Said SA; Darmanata JI; Timmermans AJ; Tijssen JG; Crijns HJ;
N Engl J Med; 2002 Dec; 347(23):1834-40. PubMed ID: 12466507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Atrial fibrillation: maintaining stability of sinus rhythm or ventricular rate control? The need for prospective data: the PIAF trial.
Hohnloser SH; Kuck KH
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Aug; 20(8 Pt 1):1989-92. PubMed ID: 9272538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rate control versus rhythm control for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation with mild to moderate heart failure: results from the RAte Control versus Electrical cardioversion (RACE) study.
Hagens VE; Crijns HJ; Van Veldhuisen DJ; Van Den Berg MP; Rienstra M; Ranchor AV; Bosker HA; Kamp O; Tijssen JG; Veeger NJ; Van Gelder IC;
Am Heart J; 2005 Jun; 149(6):1106-11. PubMed ID: 15976795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Randomized trial of rate-control versus rhythm-control in persistent atrial fibrillation: the Strategies of Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (STAF) study.
Carlsson J; Miketic S; Windeler J; Cuneo A; Haun S; Micus S; Walter S; Tebbe U;
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2003 May; 41(10):1690-6. PubMed ID: 12767648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rate control vs rhythm control in patients with nonvalvular persistent atrial fibrillation: the results of the Polish How to Treat Chronic Atrial Fibrillation (HOT CAFE) Study.
Opolski G; Torbicki A; Kosior DA; Szulc M; Wozakowska-Kaplon B; Kolodziej P; Achremczyk P;
Chest; 2004 Aug; 126(2):476-86. PubMed ID: 15302734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Atrial fibrillation--maintaining sinus rhythm versus ventricular rate control: the PIAF trial. Pharmacological Intervention in Atrial Fibrillation.
Hohnloser SH; Kuck KH
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1998 Aug; 9(8 Suppl):S121-6. PubMed ID: 9727686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Implication from randomized trials of rate and rhythm controls on management of patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.
Hagens VE; Van Veldhuisen DJ; Crijns HJ; van Gelder IC
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol; 2006 Apr; 11(2):170-86. PubMed ID: 16630092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rate versus rhythm control in atrial fibrillation.
Wijffels MC; Crijns HJ
Cardiol Clin; 2004 Feb; 22(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 14994848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation and flutter.
Mead GE; Elder AT; Flapan AD; Kelman A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2005 Jul; (3):CD002903. PubMed ID: 16034878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. AFFIRM and RACE trials: implications for the management of atrial fibrillation.
Blackshear JL; Safford RE; ;
Card Electrophysiol Rev; 2003 Dec; 7(4):366-9. PubMed ID: 15071255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Rate-control versus conversion strategy in postoperative atrial fibrillation: a prospective, randomized pilot study.
Lee JK; Klein GJ; Krahn AD; Yee R; Zarnke K; Simpson C; Skanes A; Spindler B
Am Heart J; 2000 Dec; 140(6):871-7. PubMed ID: 11099990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
