These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14618775)

  • 1. Quality of care by insurance plan. A fee-for-service versus health maintenance organization comparison.
    Silcox PD
    Outcomes Manag; 2003; 7(4):170-3. PubMed ID: 14618775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Difference in the use of preventive services between fee-for-service plans and HMOs: is more better?
    Wang YR; Pauly MV
    Am J Manag Care; 2003 Apr; 9(4):293-301. PubMed ID: 12703673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Should we stop making a fuss over HMOs?
    Pretzer M
    Med Econ; 2000 May; 77(10):41, 45. PubMed ID: 11010248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Medicare HMOs, FFS plans provide equal care following heart attack.
    Capitation Rates Data; 2001 Aug; 6(8):92-3. PubMed ID: 11526859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Awareness of and compliance with recommended screening procedures: a comparison of HMO and fee-for-service enrollees.
    Luther SL; Steverson B; Studnicki J
    Manag Care Interface; 1999 Oct; 12(10):62-8. PubMed ID: 10623010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Medical outcomes of care for breast cancer among health maintenance organization and fee-for-service patients.
    Vernon SW; Heckel V; Jackson GL
    Clin Cancer Res; 1995 Feb; 1(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 9815971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. By the numbers. Care for arthritis and other chronic conditions.
    Newman M
    Healthplan; 1996; 37(6):93-4. PubMed ID: 10162991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outcomes for rural Medicaid clients with severe mental illness in fee for service versus managed care.
    Bianconi JM; Mahler JM; McFarland BH
    Adm Policy Ment Health; 2006 Jul; 33(4):411-22. PubMed ID: 16607575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of practitioner compensation on HMO consumer satisfaction.
    Scoggins JF
    Manag Care; 2002 Apr; 11(4):49-52. PubMed ID: 11980228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identifying quality care for arthritis.
    Peterson C
    Healthplan; 2003; 44(1):46-8, 50. PubMed ID: 12611253
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality measurement in medicaid managed care and fee-for-service: the New York State experience.
    Roohan PJ; Butch JM; Anarella JP; Gesten F; Shure K
    Am J Med Qual; 2006; 21(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 16679438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. HMO care not much different from fee-for-service care, study finds.
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1994 Aug; 51(16):1994-5. PubMed ID: 7977416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Service utilization comparison of South Carolina Medicaid fee-for-service (FFS), Physician Enhanced Plan (PEP) and Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) models.
    Bradford WD
    J S C Med Assoc; 2007 Oct; 103(8):223-7. PubMed ID: 18333589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What information do consumers want and how will they use it?
    Ware JE
    Med Care; 1995 Jan; 33(1 Suppl):JS25-30. PubMed ID: 7823654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in health maintenance organizations and fee-for-service practices.
    Yelin EH; Henke CJ; Kramer JS; Nevitt MC; Shearn M; Epstein WV
    N Engl J Med; 1985 Apr; 312(15):962-7. PubMed ID: 3974686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What can be learned about the ethical soundness of Medicare HMOs from studies comparing them to fee-for-service Medicare?
    Wicclair MR
    J Ethics Law Aging; 1999; 5(1):29-49. PubMed ID: 11657821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of Medicare health care systems on women with breast and cervical cancer.
    Kirsner RS; Ma F; Fleming L; Trapido E; Duncan R; Federman DG; Wilkinson JD
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jun; 105(6):1381-8. PubMed ID: 15932833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Generalizability and longitudinal outcomes of a national heart failure clinical registry: Comparison of Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (ADHERE) and non-ADHERE Medicare beneficiaries.
    Kociol RD; Hammill BG; Fonarow GC; Klaskala W; Mills RM; Hernandez AF; Curtis LH
    Am Heart J; 2010 Nov; 160(5):885-92. PubMed ID: 21095276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. By the numbers. Consumer satisfaction with health plans.
    Stanton M
    Healthplan; 1997; 38(5):67-8. PubMed ID: 10182884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality of care of Medicare patients with diabetes in a metropolitan fee-for-service primary care integrated delivery system.
    Hollander P; Nicewander D; Couch C; Winter D; Herrin J; Haydar Z; Ballard DJ
    Am J Med Qual; 2005; 20(6):344-52. PubMed ID: 16280398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.