These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14618896)

  • 21. Taking advantage of the explosion of systematic reviews: an efficient MEDLINE search strategy.
    Shojania KG; Bero LA
    Eff Clin Pract; 2001; 4(4):157-62. PubMed ID: 11525102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [It's easy to search medical information on the Internet. How to search--step by step].
    Alton V; Eliasson M
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Oct; 97(40):4426-32, 4434. PubMed ID: 11068398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Practical experience with overviews of reviews--valuable decision aid or academic exercise?].
    Piso B; Semlitsch T; Reinsperger I; Breuer J; Kaminski-Hartenthaler A; Kien C; Thaler K; Siebenhofer A
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2015; 109(4-5):300-8. PubMed ID: 26354130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Selective use of systematic reviews in decision making].
    Burgers JS
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2018 Oct; 162():. PubMed ID: 30379507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Challenges in systematic reviews: synthesis of topics related to the delivery, organization, and financing of health care.
    Bravata DM; McDonald KM; Shojania KG; Sundaram V; Owens DK
    Ann Intern Med; 2005 Jun; 142(12 Pt 2):1056-65. PubMed ID: 15968030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Challenges in systematic reviews of therapeutic devices and procedures.
    Hartling L; McAlister FA; Rowe BH; Ezekowitz J; Friesen C; Klassen TP
    Ann Intern Med; 2005 Jun; 142(12 Pt 2):1100-11. PubMed ID: 15968035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Systematic reviews: work that needs to be done and not to be done.
    Adams CE; Polzmacher S; Wolff A
    J Evid Based Med; 2013 Nov; 6(4):232-5. PubMed ID: 24325416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Physiatry Reviews for Evidence in Practice (PREP), Second-Order Peer Reviews of Clinically Relevant Articles for the Physiatrist.
    Kumbhare D; Robinson L
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2015 Oct; 94(10):820-2. PubMed ID: 26098922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The benefits and challenges of conducting an overview of systematic reviews in public health: a focus on physical activity.
    Baker PR; Costello JT; Dobbins M; Waters EB
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2014 Sep; 36(3):517-21. PubMed ID: 25085438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Chapter 2: medical tests guidance (2) developing the topic and structuring systematic reviews of medical tests: utility of PICOTS, analytic frameworks, decision trees, and other frameworks.
    Samson D; Schoelles KM
    J Gen Intern Med; 2012 Jun; 27 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S11-9. PubMed ID: 22648670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Methods.
    ; Sherifali D; Rabi DM; McDonald CG; Butalia S; Campbell DJT; Hunt D; Leung AA; Mahon J; McBrien KA; Palda VA; Banfield L; Sanger S; Houlden RL
    Can J Diabetes; 2018 Apr; 42 Suppl 1():S6-S9. PubMed ID: 29650113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A multicomponent decision tool for prioritising the updating of systematic reviews.
    Takwoingi Y; Hopewell S; Tovey D; Sutton AJ
    BMJ; 2013 Dec; 347():f7191. PubMed ID: 24336453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evidence-based management of reproductive problems.
    Farquhar CM
    Hosp Med; 1999 Dec; 60(12):857-9. PubMed ID: 10707167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Literature research: aims and design of systematic reviews.
    de Vet HC; Verhagen AP; Logghe I; Ostelo RW
    Aust J Physiother; 2005; 51(2):125-8. PubMed ID: 15981350
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Series introduction.
    van de Laar F; Fahey T; Kenealy T; Arroll B
    Br J Gen Pract; 2013 Jan; 63(606):40. PubMed ID: 23336462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Using the Methodology of Systematic Review of Reviews for Evidence-Based Medicine.
    Hasanpoor E; Hallajzadeh J; Siraneh Y; Hasanzadeh E; Haghgoshayie E
    Ethiop J Health Sci; 2019 Nov; 29(6):775-778. PubMed ID: 31741649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Review of Diabetic Foot Ulcers.
    Feng W; Wang X
    JAMA; 2023 Nov; 330(17):1695. PubMed ID: 37934225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. "Evidence" in chronic pain--establishing best practice in the reporting of systematic reviews.
    Moore AR; Eccleston C; Derry S; Wiffen P; Bell RF; Straube S; McQuay H;
    Pain; 2010 Sep; 150(3):386-389. PubMed ID: 20627575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. How important tasks are performed: peer review.
    Hartonen T; Alava MJ
    Sci Rep; 2013; 3():1679. PubMed ID: 23591935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Tackling Peer Review: How to Improve Reviews and Minimize Abuse.
    Lau DC
    Can J Diabetes; 2016 Apr; 40(2):105-6. PubMed ID: 26952003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.