These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14618898)

  • 1. Integrating the disabled into the community in the wake of Olmstead.
    Priaulx E
    Caring; 2003 Sep; 22(9):6-10. PubMed ID: 14618898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. "Their promises of paradise": will Olmstead v. L.C. resuscitate the constitutional "least restrictive alternative" principle in mental disability law?
    Perlin ML
    Houst Law Rev; 2000; 37(4):999-1054. PubMed ID: 12071222
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Moving ahead with Olmstead: to comply with the American with Disabilities Act, states are working hard to find community placements for people with disabilities.
    Donlin JM
    State Legis; 2003 Mar; 29(3):28-31. PubMed ID: 15252945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Where the action really is: Medicaid and the disabled.
    Vladeck BC
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2003; 22(1):90-100. PubMed ID: 12528841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Law and the delivery of mental health services in the community.
    Perlin ML
    Am J Orthopsychiatry; 1994 Apr; 64(2):194-208. PubMed ID: 8037229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Where We are on the Twentieth Anniversary of
    Sloan L; Gulrajani C
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2019 Dec; 47(4):408-413. PubMed ID: 31811081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Americans With Disabilities Act and community-based treatment law.
    Petrila J
    Psychiatr Serv; 1999 Apr; 50(4):473-4, 480. PubMed ID: 10211724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Therapeutic jurisprudence and the civil rights of institutionalized mentally disabled persons: hopeless oxymoron or path to redemption?
    Perlin ML; Gould KK; Dorfman DA
    Psychol Public Policy Law; 1995 Mar; 1(1):80-119. PubMed ID: 12803207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Federal sterilization policy: unintended consequences.
    Raine SP
    Virtual Mentor; 2012 Feb; 14(2):152-7. PubMed ID: 23116958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mental retardation and the death penalty in the USA: the clinical and legal legacy.
    French LA
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2005; 15(2):82-6. PubMed ID: 16470501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A constitutional right to treatment: past, present, and future.
    Wallach S
    Prof Psychol; 1976 Nov; 7(4):453-67. PubMed ID: 11664666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Disability & ADA: Supreme Court rules on institutional confinement of disabled.
    McCants WD
    J Law Med Ethics; 1999; 27(3):281-3. PubMed ID: 11067608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Supreme Court decision paves way for home care.
    Murray JE
    Caring; 2001 Jun; 20(6):24-9. PubMed ID: 11392736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Beyond Olmstead. What the New Freedom Initiative means for long-term care.
    Maher L
    Contemp Longterm Care; 2002 Jul; 25(7):19-21. PubMed ID: 12154618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Commentary: the forgotten older adult with serious mental illness: the final challenge in achieving the promise of Olmstead?
    Bartels SJ
    J Aging Soc Policy; 2011; 23(3):244-57. PubMed ID: 21740200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes in residential arrangements of persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities in the decade following the Olmstead Decision of 1999.
    Smith D; Lakin KC; Larson S; Salmi P
    Intellect Dev Disabil; 2011 Feb; 49(1):53-4. PubMed ID: 21338314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mental health and court decisions.
    Vierling LE
    Case Manager; 2006; 17(5):20-5, 65. PubMed ID: 17016881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rights and dignity: Congress, the Supreme Court, and people with disabilities after Pennhurst.
    Ferleger D; Scott PM
    West New Engl Law Rev; 1983; 5(3):327-61. PubMed ID: 11658602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sell v. U.S.: involuntary treatment case or catalyst for change?
    Leong GB
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(3):292-4. PubMed ID: 16186189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using the Courts to Shape Medicaid Policy: Olmstead v. L.C. by Zimring and Its Community Integration Legacy.
    Rosenbaum S
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 2016 Aug; 41(4):585-97. PubMed ID: 27127257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.