These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14619052)

  • 1. [Does the Scientific Committee have power to suppress scientific misconduct?].
    Josephson S
    Lakartidningen; 2003 Oct; 100(42):3350-1. PubMed ID: 14619052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Peer review of research institutions. Evaluation or facilitation].
    Almind G
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Jan; 165(4):327-9. PubMed ID: 12599794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomedical peer review.
    Downer MC
    Community Dent Health; 1997 Dec; 14(4):207-8. PubMed ID: 9458576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Peer review: phony data, shoddy work or revolutionary results? "Truth will out".
    Friedman JH
    Med Health R I; 2000 Jul; 83(7):198. PubMed ID: 10934817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The ADHD-DAMP debate. The scientific community must protect the reliance in scientific authority].
    Thörn A
    Lakartidningen; 2003 Mar; 100(11):964-5. PubMed ID: 15148726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Investigation of scientific fraud. Statements from the Swedish Research Council not sufficiently normative].
    Werkö L
    Lakartidningen; 2006 Oct 25-31; 103(43):3288-91. PubMed ID: 17117661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peer review and scientific misconduct: bad authors and trusting reviewers.
    Malay DS
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2009; 48(3):283-4. PubMed ID: 19423027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Researchers and psychiatrists defending Gillberg's research on ADDH: Karfve's campaign is a form of personal persecution and scientific basis is missing].
    Adolfsson R; Bejerot S; Engel J; Forssberg H; Heilig M; Humble M; Ingvar M; Levander S; Oreland L; Pedersen N; Asberg M; Ohman A
    Lakartidningen; 2003 Feb; 100(8):636-7. PubMed ID: 12640980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Consequences of scientific misconduct and fraud. Is a "scientific research committee" required?].
    Jacobsson L
    Lakartidningen; 1999 Jan; 96(1-2):9-10. PubMed ID: 9951237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scientific misconduct.
    Sundaram M; Rosenthal DI; Hodler J
    Skeletal Radiol; 2007 Mar; 36(3):179. PubMed ID: 17205322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On ethical peer review and publication: the importance of professional conduct and communication.
    Spear HJ
    Nurse Author Ed; 2004; 14(4):1-3. PubMed ID: 15551686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hwang case review committee misses the mark.
    Rossner M
    J Cell Biol; 2007 Jan; 176(2):131-2. PubMed ID: 17210952
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [From misconduct to scientific probity: a turning towards prevention].
    Sylvain H
    Rech Soins Infirm; 2001 Sep; (66):4-15. PubMed ID: 12038284
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scientific misconduct.
    Klotz LH
    Can J Urol; 2001 Dec; 8(6):1392. PubMed ID: 11788015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Commentary on the allegation of scientific misconduct charge against Bucci et al.
    Colagiovanni D
    Reprod Toxicol; 2006 Oct; 22(3):554; author reply 555. PubMed ID: 16621442
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Scientific misconduct, stem cells, and the way ahead.
    Lindblad WJ
    Wound Repair Regen; 2006; 14(2):101. PubMed ID: 16630096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Scientific misconduct, mistakes or something in between?].
    Levi R
    Lakartidningen; 2006 Apr 12-25; 103(15-16):1203-5. PubMed ID: 16696201
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The response to an allegation of scientific misconduct in the Bucci et al. article on DIMP exposure in mink.
    Calonge N
    Reprod Toxicol; 2006 Oct; 22(3):553; author reply 555. PubMed ID: 16677800
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peer review and fraud.
    Nature; 2006 Dec; 444(7122):971-2. PubMed ID: 17183274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Should journals police scientific fraud?
    Marris E
    Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7076):520-1. PubMed ID: 16452946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.