134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14619071)
1. Patient e-mail. A growing trend.
Med Econ; 2003 Oct; 80(20):TCP10. PubMed ID: 14619071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Take two and e-mail me at your conveinence.
Gearon CJ
AHIP Cover; 2008; 49(4):22-6. PubMed ID: 18672810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Don't LOL at virtual visits. Technology is allowing more doctors and patients to consult via e-mail, and insurance companies are reimbursing for it.
Robeznieks A
Mod Healthc; 2007 Oct; 37(41):6-7, 16, 1. PubMed ID: 17972489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Physicians slow to adopt patient e-mail.
Liebhaber AB; Grossman JM
Data Bull (Cent Stud Health Syst Change); 2006 Sep; (32):1-2. PubMed ID: 16995287
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Doctor-patient e-mail getting hotter.
Internet Healthc Strateg; 2003 Dec; 5(12):1-5. PubMed ID: 14723116
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Online messaging opening clinical doors.
Martin Z
Health Data Manag; 2006 May; 14(5):26-8, 30, 32 passim. PubMed ID: 16722504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. E-mail medicine.
Ortolon K
Tex Med; 2002 Oct; 98(10):41-4. PubMed ID: 12391735
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Online "visits": insurers pay but docs don't play.
Terry K
Med Econ; 2006 Sep; 83(17):30-2, 34. PubMed ID: 17037417
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Lessons learned: bricks, clicks, and E-care.
Goldstein D
Manag Care Interface; 2002 Apr; 15(4):40-2. PubMed ID: 11979702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. An analysis of the utilization of e-mail by physicians and patients: defining benefits, addressing concerns and forecasting implications on the doctor-patient relationship.
Lang KT; Kiel JM
J Healthc Inf Manag; 2008; 22(2):27-32. PubMed ID: 19266992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Report weighs research on e-mail consultation, finds advantages.
Internet Healthc Strateg; 2004 Oct; 6(10):11-2. PubMed ID: 15553498
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical electronic communications: a new paradigm that is here to stay?
Eggert C; Protti D
Healthc Q; 2006; 9(4):88-96, 4. PubMed ID: 17076382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The doctor is in (your inbox).
Mettner J
Minn Med; 2009 Jan; 92(1):10-1. PubMed ID: 19397039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Lots of rest and an E-mail in the morning. Reluctantly, some doctors try online exams.
Sherrid P
US News World Rep; 2001 May; 130(18):36. PubMed ID: 11351478
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Ethical guidelines for use of electronic mail between patients and physicians.
Bovi AM;
Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(3):W-IF2. PubMed ID: 14735881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Teleneurology: a new form of physician--patient communication].
Krzystanek E; Opala G
Wiad Lek; 2005; 58(1-2):21-4. PubMed ID: 15991548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Care from a distance. Web sites, video, e-mail have growing treatment roles.
Warson A
Mod Healthc; 1997 Apr; 27(14):132, 134. PubMed ID: 10165916
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Communicating with your patients online.
Scherger JE
Fam Pract Manag; 2004 Mar; 11(3):93-4. PubMed ID: 15045883
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Patient e-mail perils.
Johnson LJ
Med Econ; 2007 Aug; 84(15):30. PubMed ID: 17853849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. E-mail consultation: clinical, financial, legal, and ethical implications.
Weiss N
Surg Neurol; 2004 May; 61(5):455-9; discussion 459. PubMed ID: 15120220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
