126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14620059)
1. Dose perturbation in the presence of metallic implants: treatment planning system versus Monte Carlo simulations.
Wieslander E; Knöös T
Phys Med Biol; 2003 Oct; 48(20):3295-305. PubMed ID: 14620059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. High-density dental implants and radiotherapy planning: evaluation of effects on dose distribution using pencil beam convolution algorithm and Monte Carlo method.
Çatli S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):46–52. PubMed ID: 26699323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the accuracy of various dose calculation algorithms of a commercial treatment planning system in the presence of hip prosthesis and comparison with Monte Carlo.
Mohammadi K; Hassani M; Ghorbani M; Farhood B; Knaup C
J Cancer Res Ther; 2017; 13(3):501-509. PubMed ID: 28862217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. VMAT Optimization and Dose Calculation in the Presence of Metallic Hip Prostheses.
Parenica HM; Mavroidis P; Jones W; Swanson G; Papanikolaou N; Stathakis S
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2019; 18():1533033819892255. PubMed ID: 31789113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dose attenuation effect of hip prostheses in a 9-MV photon beam: commercial treatment planning system versus Monte Carlo calculations.
Mesbahi A; Nejad FS
Radiat Med; 2007 Dec; 25(10):529-35. PubMed ID: 18085404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of patient dose calculation for lung IMRT: A comparison of Monte Carlo, convolution/superposition, and pencil beam computations.
Vanderstraeten B; Reynaert N; Paelinck L; Madani I; De Wagter C; De Gersem W; De Neve W; Thierens H
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3149-58. PubMed ID: 17022207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Monte Carlo evaluation of tissue inhomogeneity effects in the treatment of the head and neck.
Wang L; Yorke E; Chui CS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Aug; 50(5):1339-49. PubMed ID: 11483347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Experimental and Monte Carlo evaluation of Eclipse treatment planning system for effects on dose distribution of the hip prostheses.
Catlı S; Tanır G
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):332-6. PubMed ID: 23910447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Feasibility of Monte-Carlo algorithm in comparison with collapse-cone dose calculation algorithm of a commercial treatment planning system in the presence of high-density metallic implant: a dosimetric study.
Bhushan M; Tripathi D; Yadav G; Kumar L; Chowdhary RL; Pahuja AK; Suresh T; Shukla SK; Mitra S
J Egypt Natl Canc Inst; 2021 Jan; 33(1):2. PubMed ID: 33415487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of Monte Carlo algorithm for compliance with RTOG 0915 dosimetric criteria in peripheral lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy.
Pokhrel D; Sood S; Badkul R; Jiang H; McClinton C; Lominska C; Kumar P; Wang F
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 May; 17(3):277-293. PubMed ID: 27167284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of low-Z and high-Z metal implants in IMRT: a Monte Carlo study of dose inaccuracies in commercial dose algorithms.
Spadea MF; Verburg JM; Baroni G; Seco J
Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 41(1):011702. PubMed ID: 24387494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Advanced kernel methods vs. Monte Carlo-based dose calculation for high energy photon beams.
Fotina I; Winkler P; Künzler T; Reiterer J; Simmat I; Georg D
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Dec; 93(3):645-53. PubMed ID: 19926153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the effect of field sizes on radiation dose in the presence of metal materials using Monte Carlo simulation.
Sarigul N
Appl Radiat Isot; 2022 Apr; 182():110143. PubMed ID: 35152162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiotherapy dose calculations in the presence of hip prostheses.
Keall PJ; Siebers JV; Jeraj R; Mohan R
Med Dosim; 2003; 28(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 12804709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.
Ali I; Ahmad S
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dose comparison between Gafchromic film, XiO, and Monaco treatment planning systems in a novel pelvic phantom that contains a titanium hip prosthesis.
Ade N; du Plessis FCP
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 18(5):162-173. PubMed ID: 28741892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. SBRT of lung tumours: Monte Carlo simulation with PENELOPE of dose distributions including respiratory motion and comparison with different treatment planning systems.
Panettieri V; Wennberg B; Gagliardi G; Duch MA; Ginjaume M; Lax I
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(14):4265-81. PubMed ID: 17664607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of an analytic linear Boltzmann transport equation solver for high-density inhomogeneities.
Lloyd SA; Ansbacher W
Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 40(1):011707. PubMed ID: 23298077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Monte Carlo- versus pencil-beam-/collapsed-cone-dose calculation in a heterogeneous multi-layer phantom.
Krieger T; Sauer OA
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):859-68. PubMed ID: 15798260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
