248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14620476)
1. CPR effectiveness in microgravity: comparison of three positions and a mechanical device.
Jay GD; Lee P; Goldsmith H; Battat J; Maurer J; Suner S
Aviat Space Environ Med; 2003 Nov; 74(11):1183-9. PubMed ID: 14620476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of one-rescuer compression/ventilation ratios on cardiopulmonary resuscitation in infant, pediatric, and adult manikins.
Srikantan SK; Berg RA; Cox T; Tice L; Nadkarni VM
Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2005 May; 6(3):293-7. PubMed ID: 15857527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 2005 American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and emergency cardiovascular care (ECC) of pediatric and neonatal patients: pediatric basic life support.
American Heart Association
Pediatrics; 2006 May; 117(5):e989-1004. PubMed ID: 16651298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Basic life support in microgravity: evaluation of a novel method during parabolic flight.
Evetts SN; Evetts LM; Russomano T; Castro JC; Ernsting J
Aviat Space Environ Med; 2005 May; 76(5):506-10. PubMed ID: 15892553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Incomplete chest wall decompression: a clinical evaluation of CPR performance by EMS personnel and assessment of alternative manual chest compression-decompression techniques.
Aufderheide TP; Pirrallo RG; Yannopoulos D; Klein JP; von Briesen C; Sparks CW; Deja KA; Conrad CJ; Kitscha DJ; Provo TA; Lurie KG
Resuscitation; 2005 Mar; 64(3):353-62. PubMed ID: 15733766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rescuer fatigue: standard versus continuous chest-compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Heidenreich JW; Berg RA; Higdon TA; Ewy GA; Kern KB; Sanders AB
Acad Emerg Med; 2006 Oct; 13(10):1020-6. PubMed ID: 17015418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of rescuer position on the kinematics of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and the force of delivered compressions.
Chi CH; Tsou JY; Su FC
Resuscitation; 2008 Jan; 76(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 17689171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of different techniques for in microgravity-a simple mathematic estimation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality for space environment.
Braunecker S; Douglas B; Hinkelbein J
Am J Emerg Med; 2015 Jul; 33(7):920-4. PubMed ID: 25936478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in microgravity: efficacy in the swine during parabolic flight.
Johnston SL; Campbell MR; Billica RD; Gilmore SM
Aviat Space Environ Med; 2004 Jun; 75(6):546-50. PubMed ID: 15198283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performing chest compressions in a confined space.
Handley AJ; Handley JA
Resuscitation; 2004 Apr; 61(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 15081182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Single rescuer cardiopulmonary resuscitation: can anyone perform to the guidelines 2000 recommendations?
Higdon TA; Heidenreich JW; Kern KB; Sanders AB; Berg RA; Hilwig RW; Clark LL; Ewy GA
Resuscitation; 2006 Oct; 71(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 16942829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of chest compression rate guidance on the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation performed on manikins.
Jäntti H; Silfvast T; Turpeinen A; Kiviniemi V; Uusaro A
Resuscitation; 2009 Apr; 80(4):453-7. PubMed ID: 19203821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Incomplete chest wall decompression: a clinical evaluation of CPR performance by trained laypersons and an assessment of alternative manual chest compression-decompression techniques.
Aufderheide TP; Pirrallo RG; Yannopoulos D; Klein JP; von Briesen C; Sparks CW; Deja KA; Kitscha DJ; Provo TA; Lurie KG
Resuscitation; 2006 Dec; 71(3):341-51. PubMed ID: 17070644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Role of dominant versus non-dominant hand position during uninterrupted chest compression CPR by novice rescuers: a randomized double-blind crossover study.
Nikandish R; Shahbazi S; Golabi S; Beygi N
Resuscitation; 2008 Feb; 76(2):256-60. PubMed ID: 17822829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation on manikins: on the floor and in the bed.
Jäntti H; Silfvast T; Turpeinen A; Kiviniemi V; Uusaro A
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2009 Oct; 53(9):1131-7. PubMed ID: 19388894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Single-rescuer cardiopulmonary resuscitation: 'two quick breaths'--an oxymoron.
Heidenreich JW; Higdon TA; Kern KB; Sanders AB; Berg RA; Niebler R; Hendrickson J; Ewy GA
Resuscitation; 2004 Sep; 62(3):283-9. PubMed ID: 15325447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Compression feedback devices over estimate chest compression depth when performed on a bed.
Perkins GD; Kocierz L; Smith SC; McCulloch RA; Davies RP
Resuscitation; 2009 Jan; 80(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 18952361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CPR PRO® device reduces rescuer fatigue during continuous chest compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized crossover trial using a manikin model.
Kovic I; Lulic D; Lulic I
J Emerg Med; 2013 Oct; 45(4):570-7. PubMed ID: 23845522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rescuer's position and energy consumption, spinal kinetics, and effectiveness of simulated cardiac compression.
Jones AY; Lee RY
Am J Crit Care; 2008 Sep; 17(5):417-25; discussion 426-7. PubMed ID: 18775997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison between over-the-head and standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation performed by two rescuers: a simulation study.
Maisch S; Issleib M; Kuhls B; Mueller J; Horlacher T; Goetz AE; Schmidt GN
J Emerg Med; 2010 Sep; 39(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 19500939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
