These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14620758)
1. Non-mydriatic panoramic fundus imaging using a non-contact scanning laser-based system. Friberg TR; Pandya A; Eller AW Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2003; 34(6):488-97. PubMed ID: 14620758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laser scanning imaging for macular disease: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. McDonald HR; Williams GA; Scott IU; Haller JA; Maguire AM; Marcus DM; ; Ophthalmology; 2007 Jun; 114(6):1221-8. PubMed ID: 17466377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of a digital retinal imaging system and seven-field stereo color fundus photography to detect diabetic retinopathy in the primary care environment. Schiffman RM; Jacobsen G; Nussbaum JJ; Desai UR; Carey JD; Glasser D; Zimmer-Galler IE; Zeimer R; Goldberg MF Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2005; 36(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 15688971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of nonmydriatic digital retinal imaging versus dilated ophthalmic examination for nondiabetic eye disease in persons with diabetes. Chow SP; Aiello LM; Cavallerano JD; Katalinic P; Hock K; Tolson A; Kirby R; Bursell SE; Aiello LP Ophthalmology; 2006 May; 113(5):833-40. PubMed ID: 16650680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diabetic retinopathy screening using digital non-mydriatic fundus photography and automated image analysis. Hansen AB; Hartvig NV; Jensen MS; Borch-Johnsen K; Lund-Andersen H; Larsen M Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Dec; 82(6):666-72. PubMed ID: 15606461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Non-mydriatic single-field fundus photography for the screening of retinal diseases in an executive health clinic. Tarabishy AB; Campbell JP; Misra-Hebert A; Seballos RJ; Lang RS; Singh RP Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2011; 42(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 21410106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of digital retinal image quality among photographers with different levels of training using a non-mydriatic fundus camera. Maberley D; Morris A; Hay D; Chang A; Hall L; Mandava N Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2004 Jul; 11(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 15370551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ophthalmic fundus imaging: today and beyond. Yannuzzi LA; Ober MD; Slakter JS; Spaide RF; Fisher YL; Flower RW; Rosen R Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Mar; 137(3):511-24. PubMed ID: 15013876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of single-field nonmydriatic digital fundus image in screening for diabetic retinopathy. Suansilpong A; Rawdaree P J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Sep; 91(9):1397-403. PubMed ID: 18843870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital fundus image grading with the non-mydriatic Visucam(PRO NM) versus the FF450(plus) camera in diabetic retinopathy. Neubauer AS; Rothschuh A; Ulbig MW; Blum M Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 86(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 17944975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interobserver agreement in the interpretation of single-field digital fundus images for diabetic retinopathy screening. Ruamviboonsuk P; Teerasuwanajak K; Tiensuwan M; Yuttitham K; Ophthalmology; 2006 May; 113(5):826-32. PubMed ID: 16650679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sensitivity and specificity of digital retinal images in grading diabetic retinopathy. Saari JM; Summanen P; Kivelä T; Saari KM Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Apr; 82(2):126-30. PubMed ID: 15043527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography with multiple B-scan averaging for enhanced imaging of retinal diseases. Sakamoto A; Hangai M; Yoshimura N Ophthalmology; 2008 Jun; 115(6):1071-1078.e7. PubMed ID: 18061270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Image quality characteristics of a novel colour scanning digital ophthalmoscope (SDO) compared with fundus photography. Strauss RW; Krieglstein TR; Priglinger SG; Reis W; Ulbig MW; Kampik A; Neubauer AS Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Nov; 27(6):611-8. PubMed ID: 17956367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Results of laser photocoagulation in patients with diabetic retinopathy developed as a complication of diabetes type 2]. Wilczyński M; Dzivgielewski K Klin Oczna; 2006; 108(1-3):66-9. PubMed ID: 16883944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automatic detection of retinal anatomy to assist diabetic retinopathy screening. Fleming AD; Goatman KA; Philip S; Olson JA; Sharp PF Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(2):331-45. PubMed ID: 17202618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automated assessment of diabetic retinal image quality based on clarity and field definition. Fleming AD; Philip S; Goatman KA; Olson JA; Sharp PF Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Mar; 47(3):1120-5. PubMed ID: 16505050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The sensitivity and specificity of nonmydriatic digital stereoscopic retinal imaging in detecting diabetic retinopathy. Ahmed J; Ward TP; Bursell SE; Aiello LM; Cavallerano JD; Vigersky RA Diabetes Care; 2006 Oct; 29(10):2205-9. PubMed ID: 17003294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]