These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14620803)
1. Accountability within new ozone standards. Foley GJ; Georgopoulos PG; Lioy PJ Environ Sci Technol; 2003 Nov; 37(21):392A-399A. PubMed ID: 14620803 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. EPA's ozone standard may harm public health and welfare. Dudley SE; Gramm WL Risk Anal; 1997 Aug; 17(4):403-5. PubMed ID: 9323870 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [The United States Environmental Protection Agency has decided on a revision of the national environmental quality standards for ozone and particulate matter]. Hernández-Avila M Salud Publica Mex; 1997; 39(5):401-2. PubMed ID: 9424721 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the scientific basis for ozone/oxidants standards. Summary of an APCA International Specialty Conference. Lee SD; Kawecki JM; Tannahill GK J Air Pollut Control Assoc; 1985 Oct; 35(10):1025-32. PubMed ID: 4067088 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. An operational assessment of the application of the relative reduction factors in the demonstration of attainment of the 8-hr ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard. Sistla G; Hogrefe C; Hao W; Ku JY; Zalewsky E; Henry RF; Civerolo K J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2004 Aug; 54(8):950-9. PubMed ID: 15373363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A second chance. Setting a protective ozone standard. Dey R; Van Winkle L; Ewart G; Balmes J; Pinkerton K; Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2010 Feb; 181(4):297-9. PubMed ID: 20130144 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Atmosphere. Challenges of a lowered U.S. ozone standard. Cooper OR; Langford AO; Parrish DD; Fahey DW Science; 2015 Jun; 348(6239):1096-7. PubMed ID: 26045425 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The rationale behind updates to ambient ozone guidelines and standards. Xue K; Zhang X Front Public Health; 2023; 11():1273826. PubMed ID: 38756739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Toward a biologically significant and usable standard for ozone that will also protect plants. Paoletti E; Manning WJ Environ Pollut; 2007 Nov; 150(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 17659818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Atmospheric Science. China blamed for U.S. ozone. Hand E Science; 2014 Sep; 345(6202):1233. PubMed ID: 25214586 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficacy of recent state implementation plans for 8-hour ozone. Pegues AH; Cohan DS; Digar A; Douglass C; Wilson RS J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2012 Feb; 62(2):252-61. PubMed ID: 22442941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. European abatement of surface ozone in a global perspective. Solberg S; Derwent RG; Hov O; Langner J; Lindskog A Ambio; 2005 Feb; 34(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 15789518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ozone: unrealistic scenarios. Schwartz J; Michaels P; Davis RE Environ Health Perspect; 2005 Feb; 113(2):A86-7; author reply A87. PubMed ID: 15687041 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of background ozone on compliance with revised National Ambient Air Quality Standards. Williams DJ; Potter WT; Clarkson WW; Sanders DA; Stevens JE J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2009 Jan; 59(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 19216188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of an index to reflect the aggregate burden of long-term exposure to criteria air pollutants in the United States. Kyle AD; Woodruff TJ; Buffler PA; Davis DL Environ Health Perspect; 2002 Feb; 110 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):95-102. PubMed ID: 11834467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A decent proposal? EPA's new clean air standards. Brown KS Environ Health Perspect; 1997 Apr; 105(4):378-83. PubMed ID: 9189700 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The ozone formation potential of 1-bromo-propane. Whitten GZ; Cohen JP; Myers TC; Carter WP J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2003 Mar; 53(3):262-72. PubMed ID: 12661686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]