These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14621003)

  • 1. Wear test combining simulated occlusal wear and toothbrush wear.
    Wakamatsu Y; Kakuta K; Ogura H
    Dent Mater J; 2003 Sep; 22(3):383-96. PubMed ID: 14621003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of material and configuration of antagonist on combined wear.
    Kato K; Kakuta K; Ogura H
    Dent Mater J; 2005 Sep; 24(3):368-76. PubMed ID: 16279726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of abrasive and fiber components in medium on wear of composite resins.
    Kakuta K; Ogura H
    Dent Mater J; 2008 Sep; 27(5):716-22. PubMed ID: 18972789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of occlusal and brushing forces on wear of composite resins.
    Kon M; Kakuta K; Ogura H
    Dent Mater J; 2006 Mar; 25(1):183-94. PubMed ID: 16706316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of occlusal and brushing cycles on wear of composite resins in combined wear test.
    Wonglamsam A; Kakuta K; Ogura H
    Dent Mater J; 2008 Mar; 27(2):243-50. PubMed ID: 18540399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surface textures of composite resins after combined wear test simulating both occlusal wear and brushing wear.
    Kakuta K; Wonglamsam A; Goto S; Ogura H
    Dent Mater J; 2012 Feb; 31(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 22277607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Wear resistance of packable resin composites after simulated toothbrushing test.
    Wang L; Garcia FC; Amarante de Araújo P; Franco EB; Mondelli RF
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2004; 16(5):303-14; discussion 314-5. PubMed ID: 15726799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro wear rates of materials under different loads and varying pH.
    Shabanian M; Richards LC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jun; 87(6):650-6. PubMed ID: 12131888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Wear simulation of resin composites and the relationship to clinical wear.
    Barkmeier WW; Latta MA; Erickson RL; Wilwerding TM
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 18435192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro wear gap formation of self-adhesive resin cements: a CLSM evaluation.
    Belli R; Pelka M; Petschelt A; Lohbauer U
    J Dent; 2009 Dec; 37(12):984-93. PubMed ID: 19699255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Wear rates of resin composites.
    Barkmeier WW; Erickson RI; Latta MA; Wilwerding TM
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):226-33. PubMed ID: 22856679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance and wear of a nanocomposite versus a hybrid composite.
    Palaniappan S; Bharadwaj D; Mattar DL; Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P
    Dent Mater; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1302-14. PubMed ID: 19577288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Wear resistance of a modified polymethyl methacrylate artificial tooth compared to five commercially available artificial tooth materials.
    Kamonwanon P; Yodmongkol S; Chantarachindawong R; Thaweeboon S; Thaweeboon B; Srikhirin T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):286-92. PubMed ID: 25882971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of cyclic loading on occlusal contact area wear of composite restoratives.
    Yap AU; Teoh SH; Chew CL
    Dent Mater; 2002 Mar; 18(2):149-58. PubMed ID: 11755594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hardness and wear resistance of two resin composites cured with equivalent radiant exposure from a low irradiance LED and QTH light-curing units.
    Ramp LC; Broome JC; Ramp MH
    Am J Dent; 2006 Feb; 19(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 16555655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Two- and three-body wear of composite resins.
    Koottathape N; Takahashi H; Iwasaki N; Kanehira M; Finger WJ
    Dent Mater; 2012 Dec; 28(12):1261-70. PubMed ID: 23083806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of wear between occlusal splint materials and resin composite materials.
    Reyes-Sevilla M; Kuijs RH; Werner A; Kleverlaan CJ; Lobbezoo F
    J Oral Rehabil; 2018 Jul; 45(7):539-544. PubMed ID: 29663496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Environmental damage and occlusal contact area wear of composite restoratives.
    Yap AU; Chew CL; Ong LF; Teoh SH
    J Oral Rehabil; 2002 Jan; 29(1):87-97. PubMed ID: 11844037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Chairside repair of worn or lost denture teeth using nanofilled composite resin bonded to the denture base.
    Renne W
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Feb; 103(2):129-30. PubMed ID: 20141818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two-body in vitro wear study of some current dental composites and amalgams.
    Hu X; Marquis PM; Shortall AC
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Aug; 82(2):214-20. PubMed ID: 10424987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.