BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14621709)

  • 1. Justices restrict forced medication preceding a trial: mental competency issue. In 6-3 ruling, court says use of drugs must be in best interest of defendant.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 2003 Jun; ():A1, A20. PubMed ID: 14621709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Forcing psychiatric drugs on defendants is weighed.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 2003 Mar; ():A18. PubMed ID: 12812160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Justices let stand ruling that allows forcibly drugging an inmate before execution.
    Lewis NA
    N Y Times Web; 2003 Oct; ():A16. PubMed ID: 14610765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Forced medication of defendants to achieve trial competency: an update on the law after Sell.
    Hilgers K; Ramer P
    Georget J Leg Ethics; 2004; 17(4):813-26. PubMed ID: 15685765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Of pills and needs: involuntarily medicating the psychotic inmate when execution looms.
    Cantor JD
    Indiana Health Law Rev; 2005; 2(1):117-70. PubMed ID: 17111502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Seeking an answer: questioning the validity of forcible medication to ensure mental competency of those condemned to die.
    Stricker BW
    McGeorge Law Rev; 2000; 32(1):317-40. PubMed ID: 15709265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. State can make inmate sane enough to execute.
    Liptak A
    N Y Times Web; 2003 Feb; ():A1, A27. PubMed ID: 12812158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Forcible medication for courtroom competence--the case of Charles Sell.
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 2004 May; 350(22):2297-301. PubMed ID: 15163782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Forcible medication and personal autonomy: the case of Charles Thomas Sell.
    Quinlan M
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 2004 Feb; 84(1):275-99. PubMed ID: 16211756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New hearing on forced medication of inmate.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1990 Nov; ():A30. PubMed ID: 11646793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Between madness and death: the medicate-to-execute controversy.
    Latzer B
    Crim Justice Ethics; 2003; 22(2):3-14. PubMed ID: 15080128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Restored to health to be put to death: reconciling the legal and ethical dilemmas of medicating to execute in Singleton v. Norris.
    Hensl KB
    Villanova Law Rev; 2004; 49(2):291-328. PubMed ID: 16485377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Forcible medication and personal autonomy: the case of Charles Thomas Sell.
    Quinlan M
    Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 2005 Mar; (311):9-33. PubMed ID: 15869037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fourteenth amendment--the right to refuse antipsychotic drugs masked by prison bars.
    Sindel PE
    J Crim Law Criminol; 1991; 81(4):952-80. PubMed ID: 16145787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Old law meets new medicine: revisiting involuntary psychotropic medication of the criminal defendant.
    Siegel DM; Grudzinskas AJ; Pinals DA
    Wis L Rev; 2001; 2():307-80. PubMed ID: 16281337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Constitutional law--substantive due process--Pennsylvania Supreme Court holds that criminal defendant's best interests justify forcible medication.--Commonwealth v. Sam, 952 A.2d 565 (Pa. 2008).
    Harv Law Rev; 2009 May; 122(7):1961-8. PubMed ID: 19492499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New directions in the right to refuse mental health treatment: the implications of Riggins v. Nevada.
    Winick BJ
    William Mary Bill Rights J; 1993; 2(2):205-38. PubMed ID: 11659830
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Court upholds forced treatment of mentally ill by prison officials.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1990 Feb; ():A1, A21. PubMed ID: 11647879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Psychotropic medication in the criminal trial process: the constitutional and therapeutic implications of Riggins v. Nevada.
    Winick BJ
    N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1993; 10(Part 3):637-709. PubMed ID: 16708427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Treating incompetent defendants: the Supreme Court's decision is a tough Sell.
    Appelbaum PS
    Psychiatr Serv; 2003 Oct; 54(10):1335-6,1341. PubMed ID: 14557516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.