361 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14622053)
1. Prototype and exemplar accounts of category learning and attentional allocation: a reassessment.
Zaki SR; Nosofsky RM; Stanton RD; Cohen AL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1160-73. PubMed ID: 14622053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Exemplar and prototype models revisited: response strategies, selective attention, and stimulus generalization.
Nosofsky RM; Zaki SR
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Sep; 28(5):924-40. PubMed ID: 12219799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Thirty-something categorization results explained: selective attention, eyetracking, and models of category learning.
Rehder B; Hoffman AB
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Sep; 31(5):811-29. PubMed ID: 16248736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Exemplar effects in the context of a categorization rule: Featural and holistic influences.
Thibaut JP; Gelaes S
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1403-15. PubMed ID: 17087592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Developmental differences in the use of prototype and exemplar-specific information.
Hayes BK; Taplin JE
J Exp Child Psychol; 1993 Jun; 55(3):329-52. PubMed ID: 8315374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Distinguishing prototype-based and exemplar-based processes in dot-pattern category learning.
Smith JD; Minda JP
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jul; 28(4):800-11. PubMed ID: 12109770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tests of the ratio rule in categorization.
Wills AJ; Reimers S; Stewart N; Suret M; McLaren IP
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Nov; 53(4):983-1011. PubMed ID: 11131824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Central tendencies, extreme points, and prototype enhancement effects in ill-defined perceptual categorization.
Palmeri TJ; Nosofsky RM
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Feb; 54(1):197-235. PubMed ID: 11216316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Combining exemplar-based category representations and connectionist learning rules.
Nosofsky RM; Kruschke JK; McKinley SC
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1992 Mar; 18(2):211-33. PubMed ID: 1532819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Exemplars, prototypes, and the flexibility of classification models.
Olsson H; Wennerholm P; Lyxzèn U
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Jul; 30(4):936-41. PubMed ID: 15238035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A causal-model theory of conceptual representation and categorization.
Rehder B
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1141-59. PubMed ID: 14622052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Feature-based versus exemplar-based strategies in preschoolers' category learning.
Krascum RM; Andrews S
J Exp Child Psychol; 1993 Aug; 56(1):1-48. PubMed ID: 8366324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prototypes in category learning: the effects of category size, category structure, and stimulus complexity.
Minda JP; Smith JD
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 May; 27(3):775-99. PubMed ID: 11394680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Producing biased diagnoses with unambiguous stimuli: The importance of feature instantiations.
Hannah SD; Brooks LR
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1416-23. PubMed ID: 17087593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of feature training on the formation of exemplar-specific representations in children with mental retardation.
Rosenquist C
Am J Ment Retard; 2000 Jan; 105(1):47-57. PubMed ID: 10683708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Better learning with more error: probabilistic feedback increases sensitivity to correlated cues in categorization.
Little DR; Lewandowsky S
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):1041-61. PubMed ID: 19586269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A hybrid-similarity exemplar model for predicting distinctiveness effects in perceptual old-new recognition.
Nosofsky RM; Zaki SR
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1194-209. PubMed ID: 14622055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Extremely selective attention: eye-tracking studies of the dynamic allocation of attention to stimulus features in categorization.
Blair MR; Watson MR; Walshe RC; Maj F
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1196-206. PubMed ID: 19686015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cue abstraction and exemplar memory in categorization.
Juslin P; Jones S; Olsson H; Winman A
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):924-41. PubMed ID: 14516225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing prototype-based and exemplar-based accounts of category learning and attentional allocation.
Minda JP; Smith JD
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Mar; 28(2):275-92. PubMed ID: 11911384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
