These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14622343)

  • 1. A rapid procedure to ascertain the antimicrobial efficacy of oral care formulations.
    Sreenivasan PK; Tambs G; Gittins E; Nabi N; Gaffar A
    Oral Microbiol Immunol; 2003 Dec; 18(6):371-8. PubMed ID: 14622343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A simple approach to examine early oral microbial biofilm formation and the effects of treatments.
    Sreenivasan PK; Mattai J; Nabi N; Xu T; Gaffar A
    Oral Microbiol Immunol; 2004 Oct; 19(5):297-302. PubMed ID: 15327641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of low dose chlorhexidine mouthrinses on oral bacteria and salivary microflora including those producing hydrogen sulfide.
    Sreenivasan PK; Gittins E
    Oral Microbiol Immunol; 2004 Oct; 19(5):309-13. PubMed ID: 15327643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Susceptibilities of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans biofilms to oral antiseptics.
    Thrower Y; Pinney RJ; Wilson M
    J Med Microbiol; 1997 May; 46(5):425-9. PubMed ID: 9152040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An in vitro investigation of the antimicrobial activity of an herbal mouthrinse.
    Kaim JM; Gultz J; Do L; Scherer W
    J Clin Dent; 1998; 9(2):46-8. PubMed ID: 10518853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The antimicrobial properties of a urea-based handwash lotion with triclosan.
    Tung FF; Estafan D; Scherer W
    Gen Dent; 2001; 49(6):653-6. PubMed ID: 12024756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Antimicrobial efficiency of mouthrinses versus and in combination with different photodynamic therapies on periodontal pathogens in an experimental study.
    Decker EM; Bartha V; Kopunic A; von Ohle C
    J Periodontal Res; 2017 Apr; 52(2):162-175. PubMed ID: 27038101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative antimicrobial activities of antiseptic mouthrinses against isogenic planktonic and biofilm forms of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans.
    Fine DH; Furgang D; Barnett ML
    J Clin Periodontol; 2001 Jul; 28(7):697-700. PubMed ID: 11422593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Characterization and application of a flow system for in vitro multispecies oral biofilm formation.
    Blanc V; Isabal S; Sánchez MC; Llama-Palacios A; Herrera D; Sanz M; León R
    J Periodontal Res; 2014 Jun; 49(3):323-32. PubMed ID: 23815431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of three different infant dentifrices on biofilms and oral microorganisms.
    Modesto A; Lima KC; de Uzeda M
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(3):237-43. PubMed ID: 11314149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Antimicrobial activity produced by six dentifrices.
    Settembrini L; Gultz J; Boylan R; Scherer W
    Gen Dent; 1998; 46(3):286-8. PubMed ID: 9693543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Antibacterial and anti-biofilm activity of mouthrinses containing cetylpyridinium chloride and sodium fluoride.
    Latimer J; Munday JL; Buzza KM; Forbes S; Sreenivasan PK; McBain AJ
    BMC Microbiol; 2015 Aug; 15():169. PubMed ID: 26293609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of mouthrinses with triclosan, zinc ions, copolymer, and sodium lauryl sulphate combined with fluoride on acid formation by dental plaque in vivo.
    Giertsen E
    Caries Res; 2004; 38(5):430-5. PubMed ID: 15316186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inhibitory effects of antiseptic mouthrinses on Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sanguinis and Lactobacillus acidophilus.
    Evans A; Leishman SJ; Walsh LJ; Seow WK
    Aust Dent J; 2015 Jun; 60(2):247-54; quiz 270. PubMed ID: 25989101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differences in antimicrobial activity of four commercial 0.12% chlorhexidine mouthrinse formulations: an in vitro contact test and salivary bacterial counts study.
    Herrera D; Roldán S; Santacruz I; Santos S; Masdevall M; Sanz M
    J Clin Periodontol; 2003 Apr; 30(4):307-14. PubMed ID: 12694428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prevalence of mutans streptococci isolated from complete dentures and their susceptibility to mouthrinses.
    André RF; Andrade IM; Silva-Lovato CH; Paranhos Hde F; Pimenta FC; Ito IY
    Braz Dent J; 2011; 22(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 21519651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reduction of salivary S. aureus and mutans group streptococci by a preprocedural chlorhexidine rinse and maximal inhibitory dilutions of chlorhexidine and cetylpyridinium.
    de Albuquerque RF; Head TW; Mian H; Rodrigo A; Müller K; Sanches K; Ito IY
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Sep; 35(8):635-40. PubMed ID: 15366527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro antifungal properties of mouthrinses containing antimicrobial agents.
    Giuliana G; Pizzo G; Milici ME; Musotto GC; Giangreco R
    J Periodontol; 1997 Aug; 68(8):729-33. PubMed ID: 9287062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mouthrinses: a comparative microbiological study.
    Gautier G; Noguer M; Costa N; Canela J; Viñas M
    Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol; 2000; 42(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 11799736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Susceptibility of biofilms of Streptococcus sanguis to chlorhexidine gluconate and cetylpyridinium chloride.
    Wilson M; Patel H; Fletcher J
    Oral Microbiol Immunol; 1996 Jun; 11(3):188-92. PubMed ID: 8941774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.