These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14623138)

  • 1. Modulatory effect of inaudible high-frequency sounds on human acoustic perception.
    Yagi R; Nishina E; Honda M; Oohashi T
    Neurosci Lett; 2003 Nov; 351(3):191-5. PubMed ID: 14623138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inaudible high-frequency sounds affect brain activity: hypersonic effect.
    Oohashi T; Nishina E; Honda M; Yonekura Y; Fuwamoto Y; Kawai N; Maekawa T; Nakamura S; Fukuyama H; Shibasaki H
    J Neurophysiol; 2000 Jun; 83(6):3548-58. PubMed ID: 10848570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of biological system other than auditory air-conduction in the emergence of the hypersonic effect.
    Oohashi T; Kawai N; Nishina E; Honda M; Yagi R; Nakamura S; Morimoto M; Maekawa T; Yonekura Y; Shibasaki H
    Brain Res; 2006 Feb; 1073-1074():339-47. PubMed ID: 16458271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Top-down modulation of auditory processing: effects of sound context, musical expertise and attentional focus.
    Tervaniemi M; Kruck S; De Baene W; Schröger E; Alter K; Friederici AD
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Oct; 30(8):1636-42. PubMed ID: 19821835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High-resolution music with inaudible high-frequency components produces a lagged effect on human electroencephalographic activities.
    Kuribayashi R; Yamamoto R; Nittono H
    Neuroreport; 2014 Jun; 25(9):651-5. PubMed ID: 24722228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Frequencies of inaudible high-frequency sounds differentially affect brain activity: positive and negative hypersonic effects.
    Fukushima A; Yagi R; Kawai N; Honda M; Nishina E; Oohashi T
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e95464. PubMed ID: 24788141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The evocative power of sounds: conceptual priming between words and nonverbal sounds.
    Schön D; Ystad S; Kronland-Martinet R; Besson M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 May; 22(5):1026-35. PubMed ID: 19583472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual cues can modulate integration and segregation of objects in auditory scene analysis.
    Rahne T; Böckmann M; von Specht H; Sussman ES
    Brain Res; 2007 May; 1144():127-35. PubMed ID: 17306232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Familiarity affects the processing of task-irrelevant auditory deviance.
    Jacobsen T; Schröger E; Winkler I; Horváth J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Nov; 17(11):1704-13. PubMed ID: 16269107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sex difference in subjective duration of looming and receding sounds.
    Grassi M
    Perception; 2010; 39(10):1424-6. PubMed ID: 21180365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Event-related potential study of attention capture by affective sounds.
    Thierry G; Roberts MV
    Neuroreport; 2007 Feb; 18(3):245-8. PubMed ID: 17314665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Oscillatory decoupling differentiates auditory encoding deficits in children with listening problems.
    Gilley PM; Sharma M; Purdy SC
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):1618-1628. PubMed ID: 26675628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Concurrent sound segregation is enhanced in musicians.
    Zendel BR; Alain C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1488-98. PubMed ID: 18823227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acoustic noise improves visual perception and modulates occipital oscillatory states.
    Gleiss S; Kayser C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Apr; 26(4):699-711. PubMed ID: 24236698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory perceptual decision-making based on semantic categorization of environmental sounds.
    De Lucia M; Tzovara A; Bernasconi F; Spierer L; Murray MM
    Neuroimage; 2012 Apr; 60(3):1704-15. PubMed ID: 22330317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual processing affects the neural basis of auditory discrimination.
    Kislyuk DS; Möttönen R; Sams M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Dec; 20(12):2175-84. PubMed ID: 18457500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of age and task difficulty on ERP responses to novel sounds presented during a speech-perception-in-noise test.
    Bertoli S; Bodmer D
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Jan; 127(1):360-368. PubMed ID: 25840528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Musical expertise affects attention as reflected by auditory-evoked gamma-band activity in human EEG.
    Ott CG; Stier C; Herrmann CS; Jäncke L
    Neuroreport; 2013 Jun; 24(9):445-50. PubMed ID: 23660630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Human auditory steady state responses to binaural and monaural beats.
    Schwarz DW; Taylor P
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Mar; 116(3):658-68. PubMed ID: 15721080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sound categorization and conceptual priming for nonlinguistic and linguistic sounds.
    Aramaki M; Marie C; Kronland-Martinet R; Ystad S; Besson M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Nov; 22(11):2555-69. PubMed ID: 19929328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.