These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14623647)
1. Measurement of posterior tibial translation in the posterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee: significance of the shift in the reference position. Ma CB; Kanamori A; Vogrin TM; Woo SL; Harner CD Am J Sports Med; 2003; 31(6):843-8. PubMed ID: 14623647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Significance of changes in the reference position for measurements of tibial translation and diagnosis of cruciate ligament deficiency. Ma CB; Janaushek MA; Vogrin TM; Rudy TW; Harner CD; Woo SL J Orthop Res; 2000 Mar; 18(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 10815816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reconstruction of knees with combined cruciate deficiencies: a biomechanical study. Markolf KL; O'Neill G; Jackson SR; McAllister DR J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Sep; 85(9):1768-74. PubMed ID: 12954836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How well do anatomical reconstructions of the posterolateral corner restore varus stability to the posterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee? Markolf KL; Graves BR; Sigward SM; Jackson SR; McAllister DR Am J Sports Med; 2007 Jul; 35(7):1117-22. PubMed ID: 17581975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of knee flexion angle and application of an anterior tibial load at the time of graft fixation on the biomechanics of a posterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee. Harner CD; Janaushek MA; Ma CB; Kanamori A; Vogrin TM; Woo SL Am J Sports Med; 2000; 28(4):460-5. PubMed ID: 10921635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay versus transtibial techniques for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: analysis of knee kinematics and graft in situ forces. Margheritini F; Mauro CS; Rihn JA; Stabile KJ; Woo SL; Harner CD Am J Sports Med; 2004; 32(3):587-93. PubMed ID: 15090372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Knee stability and graft function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Comparison between 11 o'clock and 10 o'clock femoral tunnel placement. 2002 Richard O'Connor Award paper. Loh JC; Fukuda Y; Tsuda E; Steadman RJ; Fu FH; Woo SL Arthroscopy; 2003 Mar; 19(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 12627155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bicruciate lesion biomechanics, Part 2-treatment using a simultaneous tensioning protocol: ACL fixation first is better than PCL fixation first to restore tibiofemoral orientation. Franciozi CE; de Carvalho RT; Itami Y; McGarry MH; Ingham SJM; Abdalla RJ; Tibone JE; Lee TQ Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2019 Sep; 27(9):2936-2944. PubMed ID: 30267188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. No Difference in Knee Kinematics Between Anterior Cruciate Ligament-First and Posterior Cruciate Ligament-First Fixation During Single-Stage Multiligament Knee Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Study. Fayed AM; Kanto R; Price TM; DiNenna M; Linde MA; Smolinski P; van Eck C Orthop J Sports Med; 2022 Sep; 10(9):23259671221118587. PubMed ID: 36186708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Varying femoral tunnels between the anatomical footprint and isometric positions: effect on kinematics of the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee. Musahl V; Plakseychuk A; VanScyoc A; Sasaki T; Debski RE; McMahon PJ; Fu FH Am J Sports Med; 2005 May; 33(5):712-8. PubMed ID: 15722268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Importance of femoral tunnel placement in double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: biomechanical analysis using a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system. Petersen W; Lenschow S; Weimann A; Strobel MJ; Raschke MJ; Zantop T Am J Sports Med; 2006 Mar; 34(3):456-63. PubMed ID: 16303880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Anterolateral Tenodesis or Anterolateral Ligament Complex Reconstruction: Effect of Flexion Angle at Graft Fixation When Combined With ACL Reconstruction. Inderhaug E; Stephen JM; Williams A; Amis AA Am J Sports Med; 2017 Nov; 45(13):3089-3097. PubMed ID: 28898106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay and tibial tunnel techniques for reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament. Analysis of graft forces. Oakes DA; Markolf KL; McWilliams J; Young CR; McAllister DR J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Jun; 84(6):938-44. PubMed ID: 12063327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effectiveness of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with hamstrings and patellar tendon . A cadaveric study comparing anterior tibial and rotational loads. Woo SL; Kanamori A; Zeminski J; Yagi M; Papageorgiou C; Fu FH J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Jun; 84(6):907-14. PubMed ID: 12063323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reconstruction of the posterior oblique ligament and the posterior cruciate ligament in knees with posteromedial instability. Weimann A; Schatka I; Herbort M; Achtnich A; Zantop T; Raschke M; Petersen W Arthroscopy; 2012 Sep; 28(9):1283-9. PubMed ID: 22541643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical analysis of a double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Harner CD; Janaushek MA; Kanamori A; Yagi M; Vogrin TM; Woo SL Am J Sports Med; 2000; 28(2):144-51. PubMed ID: 10750988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical analysis of a combined double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner reconstruction. Sekiya JK; Haemmerle MJ; Stabile KJ; Vogrin TM; Harner CD Am J Sports Med; 2005 Mar; 33(3):360-9. PubMed ID: 15716251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Knee stability and graft function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of a lateral and an anatomical femoral tunnel placement. Yamamoto Y; Hsu WH; Woo SL; Van Scyoc AH; Takakura Y; Debski RE Am J Sports Med; 2004 Dec; 32(8):1825-32. PubMed ID: 15572308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]