230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14623686)
1. Comparison of absorbable with nonabsorbable sutures in closure of facial skin wounds.
Parell GJ; Becker GD
Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2003; 5(6):488-90. PubMed ID: 14623686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Skin closure in inguinal hernia repair with rapidly absorbing Polyglactin 910/370 (Vicryl-Rapide) suture material].
Szabó S; István G
Magy Seb; 2002 Apr; 55(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 12049012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Equal cosmetic outcomes with 5-0 poliglecaprone-25 versus 6-0 polypropylene for superficial closures.
Rosenzweig LB; Abdelmalek M; Ho J; Hruza GJ
Dermatol Surg; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1126-9. PubMed ID: 20653727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Photographic assessment of postsurgical facial scars epidermally sutured with rapidly absorbable polyglactin 910 or nylon: A randomized clinical trial.
Moran B; Humphrey S; Seal A; Berkowitz J; Zloty D
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2020 Nov; 83(5):1395-1399. PubMed ID: 32534080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of various methods and materials for treatment of skin laceration by a 3-dimensional measuring technique in a pig experiment.
Zeplin PH; Schmidt K; Laske M; Ziegler UE
Ann Plast Surg; 2007 May; 58(5):566-72. PubMed ID: 17452845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the Efficacies of Vicryl Rapide and Prolene Sutures in Transcolumellar Incision.
Savran F; Bayram F
Otolaryngol Pol; 2024 Apr; 78(2):23-28. PubMed ID: 38623859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of cosmetic outcomes of lacerations on the extremities and trunk using absorbable versus nonabsorbable sutures.
Tejani C; Sivitz AB; Rosen MD; Nakanishi AK; Flood RG; Clott MA; Saccone PG; Luck RP
Acad Emerg Med; 2014 Jun; 21(6):637-43. PubMed ID: 25039547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of scar outcomes of alar flare region using absorbable and non-absorbable sutures: a single-blind study.
Ceylan ME; Balıkçı HH
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2022; 88 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S133-S139. PubMed ID: 35729041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcomes of irradiated polyglactin 910 Vicryl Rapide fast-absorbing suture in oral and scalp wounds.
Aderriotis D; Sàndor GK
J Can Dent Assoc; 1999 Jun; 65(6):345-7. PubMed ID: 10412244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of suture materials for subcuticular skin closure at cesarean delivery.
Tuuli MG; Stout MJ; Martin S; Rampersad RM; Cahill AG; Macones GA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):490.e1-5. PubMed ID: 27179440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Incisional hernia after abdominal closure with slowly absorbable versus fast absorbable, antibacterial-coated sutures.
Justinger C; Slotta JE; Schilling MK
Surgery; 2012 Mar; 151(3):398-403. PubMed ID: 22088813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Use of absorbable suture material in dermatologic surgery].
Breuninger H; Haueisen S
Z Hautkr; 1985 Mar; 60(5):453-7. PubMed ID: 3922138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A randomized 'N-of-1' single blinded clinical trial of barbed dermal sutures vs. smooth sutures in elective plastic surgery shows differences in scar appearance two-years post-operatively.
Koide S; Smoll NR; Liew J; Smith K; Rizzitelli A; Findlay MW; Hunter-Smith DJ
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Jul; 68(7):1003-9. PubMed ID: 25840525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Vicryl Rapide versus Vicryl suture in skin closure of the hand in children: a randomized prospective study.
Al-Qattan MM
J Hand Surg Br; 2005 Feb; 30(1):90-1. PubMed ID: 15620501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Aesthetic comparison of wound closure techniques in a porcine model.
Tritle NM; Haller JR; Gray SD
Laryngoscope; 2001 Nov; 111(11 Pt 1):1949-51. PubMed ID: 11801975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reduced postoperative chronic pain after tension-free inguinal hernia repair using absorbable sutures: a single-blind randomized clinical trial.
Jeroukhimov I; Wiser I; Karasic E; Nesterenko V; Poluksht N; Lavy R; Halevy A
J Am Coll Surg; 2014 Jan; 218(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 24210149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of suture materials on healing skin wounds.
Van Winkle W; Hastings JC; Barker E; Hines D; Nichols W
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1975 Jan; 140(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 1108243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cosmetic outcome and surgical site infection rates of antibacterial absorbable (Polyglactin 910) suture compared to Chinese silk suture in breast cancer surgery: a randomized pilot research.
Zhang ZT; Zhang HW; Fang XD; Wang LM; Li XX; Li YF; Sun XW; Carver J; Simpkins D; Shen J; Weisberg M
Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Mar; 124(5):719-24. PubMed ID: 21518565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Buried absorbable polyglactin 910 sutures do not result in stronger wounds in porcine full thickness skin incisions.
Townsend KL; Lear W; Robertson BL; Kruzic JJ
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Oct; 63():386-389. PubMed ID: 27454524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Triclosan-coated sutures reduce wound infections after spinal surgery: a retrospective, nonrandomized, clinical study.
Ueno M; Saito W; Yamagata M; Imura T; Inoue G; Nakazawa T; Takahira N; Uchida K; Fukahori N; Shimomura K; Takaso M
Spine J; 2015 May; 15(5):933-8. PubMed ID: 23992939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
