These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14624504)

  • 1. Fibrous encapsulation of single polymer microfibers depends on their vertical dimension in subcutaneous tissue.
    Sanders JE; Rochefort JR
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2003 Dec; 67(4):1181-7. PubMed ID: 14624504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relative influence of polymer fiber diameter and surface charge on fibrous capsule thickness and vessel density for single-fiber implants.
    Sanders JE; Cassisi DV; Neumann T; Golledge SL; Zachariah SG; Ratner BD; Bale SD
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2003 Jun; 65(4):462-7. PubMed ID: 12761836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tissue response to single-polymer fibers of varying diameters: evaluation of fibrous encapsulation and macrophage density.
    Sanders JE; Stiles CE; Hayes CL
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2000 Oct; 52(1):231-7. PubMed ID: 10906696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tissue response to microfibers of different polymers: polyester, polyethylene, polylactic acid, and polyurethane.
    Sanders JE; Bale SD; Neumann T
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2002 Nov; 62(2):222-7. PubMed ID: 12209942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Polymer microfiber mechanical properties: a system for assessment and investigation of the link with fibrous capsule formation.
    Sanders JE; Nicholson BS; Mitchell SB; Ledger RE
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2003 Dec; 67(4):1412-6. PubMed ID: 14624529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tissue reaction to matrices of reconstituted keratin polymer implanted subcutaneously in sheep.
    Peplow PV; Dias GJ; Teixeira F; Kelly RJ
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2009 Apr; 89(1):255-65. PubMed ID: 18465821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fibrous capsule formation in response to ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene treated with peptides that influence adhesion.
    Johnson R; Harrison D; Tucci M; Tsao A; Lemos M; Puckett A; Hughes JL; Benghuzzi H
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1997; 34():47-52. PubMed ID: 9603011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biocompatibility of steroid-HA delivery system using adult castrated rams as a model.
    Benghuzzi H; England B
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2001; 37():275-80. PubMed ID: 11347402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Foreign body response to subcutaneous biomaterial implants in a mast cell-deficient Kit(w-Sh) murine model.
    Avula MN; Rao AN; McGill LD; Grainger DW; Solzbacher F
    Acta Biomater; 2014 May; 10(5):1856-63. PubMed ID: 24406200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mechanical attachment of soft fibrous tissues to implants by using mesh structures.
    Asoda S; Arita T; Koshitomae H; Takakuda K
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1171-7. PubMed ID: 18983321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Soft-tissue response to silicone and poly-L-lactic acid implants with a periodic or random surface micropattern.
    Parker JA; Walboomers XF; Von den Hoff JW; Maltha JC; Jansen JA
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2002 Jul; 61(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 12001251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fibro-porous meshes made from polyurethane micro-fibers: effects of surface charge on tissue response.
    Sanders JE; Lamont SE; Karchin A; Golledge SL; Ratner BD
    Biomaterials; 2005 Mar; 26(7):813-8. PubMed ID: 15350787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pore size in implanted polypropylene filters is critical for tissue organization.
    Rosengren A; Bjursten LM
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2003 Dec; 67(3):918-26. PubMed ID: 14613240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of liposome-delivered prednisolone on collagen density, myofibroblasts, and fibrous capsule thickness around silicone breast implants in rats.
    Moreira M; Fagundes DJ; de Jesus Simões M; Taha MO; Perez LM; Bazotte RB
    Wound Repair Regen; 2010; 18(4):417-25. PubMed ID: 20636553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Time course study of long-term biocompatibility and foreign body reaction to intraneural polyimide-based implants.
    de la Oliva N; Navarro X; Del Valle J
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2018 Mar; 106(3):746-757. PubMed ID: 29052368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Estimation of biocompatibility of fibers with large mechanical resistance].
    Zywicka B
    Polim Med; 2004; 34(3):3-48. PubMed ID: 15631154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of bone anchoring and micro-grooves on the soft tissue reaction to implants.
    Parker JA; Walboomers XF; Von den Hoff JW; Maltha JC; Jansen JA
    Biomaterials; 2002 Sep; 23(18):3887-96. PubMed ID: 12164194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cytological evaluation of the tissue-implant reaction associated with S/C and I/P implantation of ALCAP and HA bioceramics in vivo.
    Butler K; Benghuzzi H; Puckett A
    Pathol Res Pract; 2001; 197(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 11209814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative analysis of the cellular components of the fibrous tissue matrix surrounding ALCAP, HA, and TCP bioceramics using adult male rats as a model.
    Butler K; Puckett A; Benghuzzi H
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1999; 35():267-72. PubMed ID: 11143360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An investigation of the cytotoxicity and histocompatibility of in situ forming lactic acid based orthopedic biomaterials.
    Burdick JA; Padera RF; Huang JV; Anseth KS
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2002; 63(5):484-91. PubMed ID: 12209891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.