These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14625792)

  • 1. Vertical and horizontal neoclassical facial canons in Turkish young adults.
    Bozkir MG; Karakas P; Oguz O
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2004 Jun; 26(3):212-9. PubMed ID: 14625792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of soft-tissue morphology of the face in 1,050 young adults.
    Borman H; Ozgür F; Gürsu G
    Ann Plast Surg; 1999 Mar; 42(3):280-8. PubMed ID: 10096619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do the neoclassical canons still describe the beauty of faces? An anthropometric study on 50 Caucasian models.
    Torsello F; Mirigliani L; D'Alessio R; Deli R
    Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 20529624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The validity of three neo-classical facial canons in young adults originating from the Arabian Peninsula.
    Al-Sebaei MO
    Head Face Med; 2015 Mar; 11():4. PubMed ID: 25889948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Craniofacial morphologic parameters in a Persian population: an anthropometric study.
    Amini F; Mashayekhi Z; Rahimi H; Morad G
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 25(5):1874-81. PubMed ID: 25203584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The validity of eight neoclassical facial canons in the Turkish adults.
    Karaca Saygili O; Cinar S; Gulcen B; Ozcan E; Kus I
    Folia Morphol (Warsz); 2016; 75(4):512-517. PubMed ID: 27830884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Anthropometric Analysis of the Face.
    Zacharopoulos GV; Manios A; Kau CH; Velagrakis G; Tzanakakis GN; de Bree E
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Jan; 27(1):e71-5. PubMed ID: 26703056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Craniofacial morphometry by photographic evaluations.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Miani A; Tartaglia G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Apr; 103(4):327-37. PubMed ID: 8480698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Facial anthropometry in newborns in Pondicherry.
    Shah M; Verma IC; Mahadevan S; Puri RK
    Indian J Pediatr; 1991; 58(2):259-63. PubMed ID: 1879908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Sudanese female face: normative craniofacial measurements and comparison with African-American and North American White females.
    Salah M; Higzi MA; Ali RW; Naini FB
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1704-9. PubMed ID: 25012648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anthropometric facial analysis of the African American woman.
    Porter JP; Olson KL
    Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2001; 3(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 11497505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-dimensional assessment of the relative contribution of genetics and environment to various facial parameters with the twin method.
    Naini FB; Moss JP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Dec; 126(6):655-65. PubMed ID: 15592212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Proportionality in Asian and North American Caucasian faces using neoclassical facial canons as criteria.
    Le TT; Farkas LG; Ngim RC; Levin LS; Forrest CR
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2002; 26(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 11891603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Craniofacial anthropometric norms of Malays.
    Ngeow WC; Aljunid ST
    Singapore Med J; 2009 May; 50(5):525-8. PubMed ID: 19495526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vertical and horizontal proportions of the face in young adult North American Caucasians: revision of neoclassical canons.
    Farkas LG; Hreczko TA; Kolar JC; Munro IR
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1985 Mar; 75(3):328-38. PubMed ID: 3883374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do long-faced subjects really have a long anterior face? A longitudinal study.
    Ha Y; Park YS; Lee SP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jun; 145(6):799-806. PubMed ID: 24880851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Describing normal variations of head and face by using standard measurement and craniofacial variability index (CVI) in seven-year-old normal children.
    Ozdemir MB; Ilgaz A; Dilek A; Ayten H; Esat A
    J Craniofac Surg; 2007 May; 18(3):470-4. PubMed ID: 17538305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Proportion indices in the craniofacial regions of 284 healthy North American white children between 1 and 5 years of age.
    Farkas LG; Hreczko TM; Katic MJ; Forrest CR
    J Craniofac Surg; 2003 Jan; 14(1):13-28. PubMed ID: 12544216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Standards of soft tissue Arnett analysis for surgical planning in Turkish adults.
    Uysal T; Yagci A; Basciftci FA; Sisman Y
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):449-56. PubMed ID: 19482876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Revision of neoclassical facial canons in young adult Afro-Americans.
    Farkas LG; Forrest CR; Litsas L
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2000; 24(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 10890944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.