These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14626268)
1. The logical next step? An international perspective on the issues of human cloning and genetic technology. Corsover JT ILSA J Int Law; 1998; 4(2):697-758. PubMed ID: 14626268 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Tying Prometheus down: the international law of human genetic manipulation. Marks SP Chic J Int Law; 2002; 3(1):115-36. PubMed ID: 15709303 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Biotechnology and the future of humanity. Cameron NM J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2006; 22(2):413-23. PubMed ID: 17117704 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Attack of the anti-cloners: what the government should do. Caplan A Free Inq; 2002-2003 Winter; 23(1):30-1. PubMed ID: 16208833 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The context of embryonic development and its ethical relevance. Camporesi S Biotechnol J; 2007 Sep; 2(9):1147-53. PubMed ID: 17703488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Washington Insider: Congressional impasse on human cloning. Doerflinger RM Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2004; 4(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 15192847 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Drawing the line at not-fully-human: what we already know. Franklin S Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(3):W25-W27. PubMed ID: 14594477 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Bioethics and health law in New Zealand: bioethics commentary. Pickering N N Z Bioeth J; 2002 Feb; 3(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 15587483 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Ethical concerns of American Evangelical Christians relative to genetic interventions and the Human Genome Project, 1974 to the present. Davis JJ Ethics Med; 2004; 20(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 15462045 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The sanctity of life in a brave new world: a manifesto on biotechnology and human dignity. Council for Biotechnology Policy, USA Hum Reprod Genet Ethics; 2003; 9(2):36-7. PubMed ID: 14964213 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. From human genes to stem cells: new challenges for patent law? Caulfield TA Trends Biotechnol; 2003 Mar; 21(3):101-3. PubMed ID: 12628363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Why conservatives care about biotechnology. Wolfson A New Atlantis; 2003; (2):55-64. PubMed ID: 15584197 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Ethics issues in stem cell research. International Stem Cell Forum Ethics Working Party Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5772):366-7. PubMed ID: 16627723 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Bio-patents, law and ethics. Critical analysis of the EU biotechnology directive. Van Overwalle G Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2003; (19):187-203. PubMed ID: 15032104 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The need for international stem cell agreements. Resnik DB Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Oct; 22(10):1207. PubMed ID: 15470449 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Nuclear transfer cloning and the United Nations. Perry AC Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Dec; 22(12):1506-8. PubMed ID: 15583651 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Europe/Japan face up to legal hurdles to cloning. Michael A Nat Biotechnol; 1997 Jul; 15(7):609-10. PubMed ID: 9219253 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Calls for cloning ban sell science short. Butler D; Wadman M Nature; 1997 Mar; 386(6620):8-9. PubMed ID: 9052770 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A regulatory patchwork--human ES cell research oversight. Knowles LP Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Feb; 22(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 14755285 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]