217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14626436)
1. Rapid MRSA detection by a latex kit.
Chediac-Tannoury R; Araj GF
Clin Lab Sci; 2003; 16(4):198-202. PubMed ID: 14626436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Evaluation of MRSA identification with latex agglutination kit for the detection of penicillin-binding protein 2].
Ito Y; Morita E; Moriyama M; Kuono H; Tanaka K; Kato N; Watanabe K
Rinsho Biseibutshu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai Shi; 2001; 12(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 11682001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the Vitek gram-positive susceptibility 106 card, the MRSA-Screen latex agglutination test, and mecA analysis for detecting oxacillin resistance in a geographically diverse collection of clinical isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci.
Yamazumi T; Furuta I; Diekema DJ; Pfaller MA; Jones RN
J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Oct; 39(10):3633-6. PubMed ID: 11574584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Methicillin resistance detection in Staphylococcus aureus: comparison between conventional methods and MRSA-Screen latex agglutination technique].
Soloaga R; Corso A; Gagetti P; Faccone D; Galas M;
Rev Argent Microbiol; 2004; 36(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 15174748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: comparison of susceptibility testing methods and analysis of mecA-positive susceptible strains.
Sakoulas G; Gold HS; Venkataraman L; DeGirolami PC; Eliopoulos GM; Qian Q
J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Nov; 39(11):3946-51. PubMed ID: 11682512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the Vitek Gram-Positive Susceptibility 106 card and the MRSA-screen latex agglutination test for determining oxacillin resistance in clinical bloodstream isolates of Staphylococcus aureus.
Yamazumi T; Marshall SA; Wilke WW; Diekema DJ; Pfaller MA; Jones RN
J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Jan; 39(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 11136748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of a latex agglutination test (MRSA-Screen) for detection of oxacillin resistance in coagulase-negative Staphylococci.
Louie L; Majury A; Goodfellow J; Louie M; Simor AE
J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Nov; 39(11):4149-51. PubMed ID: 11682545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical validation of the molecular BD GeneOhm StaphSR assay for direct detection of Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in positive blood cultures.
Stamper PD; Cai M; Howard T; Speser S; Carroll KC
J Clin Microbiol; 2007 Jul; 45(7):2191-6. PubMed ID: 17522275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of MRSA-Screen, a simple anti-PBP 2a slide latex agglutination kit, for rapid detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.
Cavassini M; Wenger A; Jaton K; Blanc DS; Bille J
J Clin Microbiol; 1999 May; 37(5):1591-4. PubMed ID: 10203531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of polymerase chain reaction, conventional and MRSA screen latex agglutination methods for detection of methicillin-resistant, -borderline and -susceptible Staphylococcus aureus.
Chomvarin C; Siripornmongcolchai T; Chaicumpar K; Limpaiboon T; Wongkham C; Yutanawiboonchai W
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 2004 Dec; 35(4):879-85. PubMed ID: 15916085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Multi-center evaluation to discriminate between the strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and those susceptible (MSSA) by Showa oxacillin and methicillin disk susceptibility tests].
Takahashi A; Yamane N; Igari J; Oguri T; Toyoshima S; Moriyasu I; Takemori K; Tosaka M; Minamide W
Rinsho Byori; 1994 Sep; 42(9):953-60. PubMed ID: 7967120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of phenotypic versus genotypic methods in the detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.
Mohanasoundaram KM; Lalitha MK
Indian J Med Res; 2008 Jan; 127(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 18316857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multicenter evaluation of BBL CHROMagar MRSA medium for direct detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from surveillance cultures of the anterior nares.
Flayhart D; Hindler JF; Bruckner DA; Hall G; Shrestha RK; Vogel SA; Richter SS; Howard W; Walther R; Carroll KC
J Clin Microbiol; 2005 Nov; 43(11):5536-40. PubMed ID: 16272482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Short communication: use of cefoxitin disc diffusion method for the detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates].
Coban AY; Darka O; Taşdelen Fişgin N; Aksakal Tanyel E; Cetinkaya Sensoy E; Hepsert SA; Birinci A; Durupinar B
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2007 Jan; 41(1):109-13. PubMed ID: 17427559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Methods for identifying methicillin resistancein Staphylococcus aureus.
Smyth RW; Kahlmeter G; Olsson Liljequist B; Hoffman B
J Hosp Infect; 2001 Jun; 48(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 11428876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Evaluation of oxacillin resistance screening agar and chromogenic MRSA agar media for the detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates].
Cesur S; Yildiz E; Irmak H; Aygün Z; Karakoç E; Kinikli S; Demiröz AP
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2010 Apr; 44(2):279-84. PubMed ID: 20549963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of three techniques for detection of low-level methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): a disk diffusion method with cefoxitin and moxalactam, the Vitek 2 system, and the MRSA-screen latex agglutination test.
Felten A; Grandry B; Lagrange PH; Casin I
J Clin Microbiol; 2002 Aug; 40(8):2766-71. PubMed ID: 12149327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparison of different detection methods for methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus].
Soloaga R; Procopio A; Aguilar J; Dutruel A; Labat R; Domínguez M; Vázquez M; Liñares J; Defain V
Rev Argent Microbiol; 2002; 34(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 11942084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improvement of a latex agglutination test for the evaluation of oxacillin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci.
Corso A; Soloaga R; Faccone D; Gagetti P; Corbella S; Iglesias M; Galas M
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2004 Nov; 50(3):223-5. PubMed ID: 15541610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of three rapid methods for detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.
Louie L; Matsumura SO; Choi E; Louie M; Simor AE
J Clin Microbiol; 2000 Jun; 38(6):2170-3. PubMed ID: 10834971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
