160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14626885)
1. Decision-making at the end-of-life and the incompetent patient: a comparative approach.
Halliday S; Witteck L
Med Law; 2003; 22(3):533-42. PubMed ID: 14626885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Forgoing medical treatment: to withdraw, withhold, deny.
Cotler M
Semin Anesth; 1991 Sep; 10(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 11651354
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Legal issues of physician-assisted euthanasia. Part III--Passive euthanasia, comparison of international legislation, conclusions for medical practice].
Laux J; Röbel A; Parzeller M
Arch Kriminol; 2013; 231(3-4):73-115. PubMed ID: 23678624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Euthanasia and law reform.
Samek R
Ottawa Law Rev; 1984; 17(1):86-115. PubMed ID: 11649198
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Death with dignity: implementing one's right to die.
Zaremba JF
Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1987; 64(3):557-77. PubMed ID: 11651900
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A nationwide study of decisions to forego life-prolonging treatment in Dutch medical practice.
Groenewoud JH; van der Heide A; Kester JG; de Graaff CL; van der Wal G; van der Maas PJ
Arch Intern Med; 2000 Feb; 160(3):357-63. PubMed ID: 10668838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reconciling Quinlan and Saikewicz: decision making for the terminally ill incompetent.
Annas GJ
Am J Law Med; 1979; 4(4):367-96. PubMed ID: 507056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of patient incompetence on decisions to use or withhold life-sustaining treatment.
Hanson LC; Danis M; Mutran E; Keenan NL
Am J Med; 1994 Sep; 97(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 8092172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The real ethic of death and dying.
Cantor NL
Mich Law Rev; 1996 May; 94(6):1718-38. PubMed ID: 11656929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Matter of Storar; Eichner v. Dillon.
New York. Court of Appeals
North East Rep Second Ser; 1981 Mar; 420():64-80. PubMed ID: 12041255
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. In re Martin.
Michigan. Court of Appeals
Wests North West Rep; 1993 Jul; 504():917-28. PubMed ID: 12041148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Death-Prolonging Procedures Act and refusal of treatment in Missouri.
Johnson SH
St Louis Univ Law J; 1986; 30(3):805-32. PubMed ID: 11649879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Active and passive euthanasia--ten years into the debate.
Kuhse H
Euthan Rev; 1986; 1(2):108-19. PubMed ID: 11649796
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Decision making in acute care: a practical framework supporting the 'best interests' principle.
Bailey S
Nurs Ethics; 2006 May; 13(3):284-91. PubMed ID: 16711187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Incubator or individual?: the legal and policy deficiencies of pregnancy clauses in living will and advance health care directive statutes.
Burch TJ
MD Law Rev; 1995; 54(2):528-70. PubMed ID: 11653265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Ethical issues and terminal management of the old old.
Hesse KA
J Geriatr Psychiatry; 1995; 28(1):75-95. PubMed ID: 11654994
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Is there a constitutional right to die?
Wickett A
Euthan Rev; 1986; 1(2):138-50. PubMed ID: 11649799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Letting patients die: legal and moral reflections.
Kadish SH
Calif Law Rev; 1992 Jul; 80(4):857-88. PubMed ID: 11652646
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Decisionmaking for the incompetent terminally ill patient: a compromise in a solution eliminates a compromise of patients' rights.
Knezevich CA
Indiana Law J; 1982; 57(2):325-48. PubMed ID: 11649706
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Withholding and withdrawing life-prolonging treatment--from the bioethical and legal viewpoints].
Minooka M; Inaba K
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2006 Dec; 33 Suppl 2():267-9. PubMed ID: 17469356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
