These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14626972)

  • 1. Military urged to follow Supreme Court lead on sodomy laws.
    AIDS Policy Law; 2003 Oct; 18(20):5. PubMed ID: 14626972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Marching to the beat of a different drummer: is military law and mental health out-of-step after Jaffee v. Redmond?
    Zanotti BJ; Becker RA
    Air Force Law Rev; 1997; 41():1-82. PubMed ID: 16211752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Supreme Court strikes down Montana's sodomy law.
    AIDS Policy Law; 1997 Aug; 12(14):3. PubMed ID: 11364554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What Lawrence v. Texas says about the history and future of reproductive rights.
    Dailard C
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):717-23. PubMed ID: 16700117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sexual and reproductive health care for adolescents: legal rights and policy challenges.
    English A
    Adolesc Med State Art Rev; 2007 Dec; 18(3):571-81, viii-ix. PubMed ID: 18453235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The undue burden: parental notification requirements for publicly funded contraception.
    Bornstein S
    Berkeley Womens Law J; 2000; 15():40-75. PubMed ID: 16518901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tiptoeing around Roe.
    Meehan M
    Hum Life Rev; 2005; 31(4):44-64. PubMed ID: 16619432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The right to privacy: Roe v. Wade revisited.
    Smith PA
    Jurist; 1983; 43(2):289-317. PubMed ID: 16086474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Misconceived laws: the irrationality of parental involvement requirements for contraception.
    Arons JR
    William Mary Law Rev; 2000 Mar; 41(3):1093-131. PubMed ID: 16329212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evolving constitutional privacy doctrines affecting healthcare enterprises.
    Krulwich AS; McDonald BL
    Food Drug Cosmet Law J; 2000; 55(4):491-516. PubMed ID: 16493801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Physician assistant as abortion provider: lessons from Vermont, New York, and Montana.
    Schirmer JT
    Hastings Law J; 1997 Nov; 49(1):253-88. PubMed ID: 14758819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Abortion rights after South Dakota.
    McDonagh E
    Free Inq; 2006; 26(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 16830439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Medical malpractice in the military.
    Mangalmurti SS; Murtagh L; Mello MM
    N Engl J Med; 2011 Aug; 365(7):664-70. PubMed ID: 21848468
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mandatory genetic dogtags and the Fourth Amendment: the need for a new post-Skinner test.
    Scherer RC
    Georgetown Law J; 1997 Jun; 85(6):2007-38. PubMed ID: 16523576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Forgotten Supreme Court abortion cases: Drs. Hawker and Hurwitz in the deck and defrocked.
    Lucas R
    Pepperdine Law Rev; 2003 May; 30(4):641-70. PubMed ID: 15237509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The decriminalization of sodomy in the United States.
    Weinmeyer R
    Virtual Mentor; 2014 Nov; 16(11):916-22. PubMed ID: 25397652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. CO2 in the Supreme Court.
    Cooney CM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Mar; 41(5):1511-2. PubMed ID: 17396633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. State constitutional privacy rights post Webster--broader protection against abortion restrictions?
    Ezzard MM
    Denver Univ Law Rev; 1990; 67(3):401-19. PubMed ID: 15999439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Jon O. Newman and the abortion decisions: a remarkable first year.
    Hurwitz AD
    NY Law Sch Law Rev; 2002-2003; 46(1-2):231-47. PubMed ID: 16493839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The rhetoric of disrespect: uncovering the faulty premises infecting reproductive rights.
    Reilly EA
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 1996; 5(1):147-205. PubMed ID: 16594108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.