206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14627567)
1. Dual-energy chest radiography with a flat-panel digital detector: revealing calcified chest abnormalities.
Fischbach F; Freund T; Röttgen R; Engert U; Felix R; Ricke J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Dec; 181(6):1519-24. PubMed ID: 14627567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical results of CsI-detector-based dual-exposure dual energy in chest radiography.
Ricke J; Fischbach F; Freund T; Teichgräber U; Hänninen EL; Röttgen R; Engert U; Eichstädt H; Felix R
Eur Radiol; 2003 Dec; 13(12):2577-82. PubMed ID: 12819915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. CsI-detector-based dual-exposure dual energy in chest radiography for lung nodule detection: results of an international multicenter trial.
Rühl R; Wozniak MM; Werk M; Laurent F; Mager G; Montaudon M; Pattermann A; Scherrer A; Tasu JP; Pech M; Ricke J
Eur Radiol; 2008 Sep; 18(9):1831-9. PubMed ID: 18425520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dual-energy subtraction chest radiography: what to look for beyond calcified nodules.
Kuhlman JE; Collins J; Brooks GN; Yandow DR; Broderick LS
Radiographics; 2006; 26(1):79-92. PubMed ID: 16418245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic performance of a prototype dual-energy chest imaging system ROC analysis.
Kashani H; Varon CA; Paul NS; Gang GJ; Van Metter R; Yorkston J; Siewerdsen JH
Acad Radiol; 2010 Mar; 17(3):298-308. PubMed ID: 20042351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detectability of lung nodules using flat panel detector with dual energy subtraction by two shot method: evaluation by ROC method.
Tagashira H; Arakawa K; Yoshimoto M; Mochizuki T; Murase K
Eur J Radiol; 2007 Nov; 64(2):279-84. PubMed ID: 17386991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Clinical evaluation of single-exposure dual-energy subtraction chest radiography: with FCR 9501 ES].
Takashima T
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1996 Nov; 56(13):909-16. PubMed ID: 8969053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Routine chest radiography using a flat-panel detector: image quality at standard detector dose and 33% dose reduction.
Strotzer M; Völk M; Fründ R; Hamer O; Zorger N; Feuerbach S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jan; 178(1):169-71. PubMed ID: 11756114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Conventional chest radiography vs dual-energy computed radiography in the detection and characterization of pulmonary nodules.
Kelcz F; Zink FE; Peppler WW; Kruger DG; Ergun DL; Mistretta CA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Feb; 162(2):271-8. PubMed ID: 8310908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection of small pulmonary nodules on chest radiographs: efficacy of dual-energy subtraction technique using flat-panel detector chest radiography.
Oda S; Awai K; Funama Y; Utsunomiya D; Yanaga Y; Kawanaka K; Nakaura T; Hirai T; Murakami R; Nomori H; Yamashita Y
Clin Radiol; 2010 Aug; 65(8):609-15. PubMed ID: 20599062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multi-Institutional Evaluation of Digital Tomosynthesis, Dual-Energy Radiography, and Conventional Chest Radiography for the Detection and Management of Pulmonary Nodules.
Dobbins JT; McAdams HP; Sabol JM; Chakraborty DP; Kazerooni EA; Reddy GP; Vikgren J; Båth M
Radiology; 2017 Jan; 282(1):236-250. PubMed ID: 27439324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical evaluation of pulmonary nodules with dual-exposure dual-energy subtraction chest radiography.
Uemura M; Miyagawa M; Yasuhara Y; Murakami T; Ikura H; Sakamoto K; Tagashira H; Arakawa K; Mochizuki T
Radiat Med; 2005 Sep; 23(6):391-7. PubMed ID: 16389980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Digital chest radiography with a selenium-based flat-panel detector versus a storage phosphor system: comparison of soft-copy images.
Goo JM; Im JG; Kim JH; Seo JB; Kim TS; Shine SJ; Lee W
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Oct; 175(4):1013-8. PubMed ID: 11000155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of chest dual-energy subtraction digital tomosynthesis imaging and dual-energy subtraction radiography to detect simulated pulmonary nodules with and without calcifications a phantom study.
Gomi T; Nakajima M; Fujiwara H; Umeda T
Acad Radiol; 2011 Feb; 18(2):191-6. PubMed ID: 21232683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The solitary pulmonary nodule on chest radiography: can we really tell if the nodule is calcified?
Berger WG; Erly WK; Krupinski EA; Standen JR; Stern RG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Jan; 176(1):201-4. PubMed ID: 11133566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic Performance of Ultra-Low-Dose Computed Tomography for Detecting Asbestos-Related Pleuropulmonary Diseases: Prospective Study in a Screening Setting.
Schaal M; Severac F; Labani A; Jeung MY; Roy C; Ohana M
PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0168979. PubMed ID: 28033378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Digital storage phosphor chest radiography: an ROC study of the effect of 2K versus 4K matrix size on observer performance.
Miró SP; Leung AN; Rubin GD; Choi YH; Kee ST; Mindelzun RE; Stark P; Wexler L; Plevritis SK; Betts BJ
Radiology; 2001 Feb; 218(2):527-32. PubMed ID: 11161174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Digital radiography versus conventional radiography in chest imaging: diagnostic performance of a large-area silicon flat-panel detector in a clinical CT-controlled study.
Garmer M; Hennigs SP; Jäger HJ; Schrick F; van de Loo T; Jacobs A; Hanusch A; Christmann A; Mathias K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jan; 174(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 10628458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improved detection of small lung cancers with dual-energy subtraction chest radiography.
Li F; Engelmann R; Doi K; MacMahon H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Apr; 190(4):886-91. PubMed ID: 18356433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bone images from dual-energy subtraction chest radiography in the detection of rib fractures.
Szucs-Farkas Z; Lautenschlager K; Flach PM; Ott D; Strautz T; Vock P; Ruder TD
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Aug; 79(2):e28-32. PubMed ID: 20171819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
