206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14627567)
21. Chest radiography with a flat-panel detector: image quality with dose reduction after copper filtration.
Hamer OW; Sirlin CB; Strotzer M; Borisch I; Zorger N; Feuerbach S; Völk M
Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):691-700. PubMed ID: 16192324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effectiveness of one-shot dual-energy subtraction chest radiography with flat-panel detector in distinguishing between calcified and non-calcified nodules.
Minato K; Yamazaki M; Yagi T; Hirata T; Tominaga M; You K; Ishikawa H
Sci Rep; 2023 Jun; 13(1):9548. PubMed ID: 37308582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Development of a high-performance dual-energy chest imaging system: initial investigation of diagnostic performance.
Kashani H; Gang JG; Shkumat NA; Varon CA; Yorkston J; Van Metter R; Paul NS; Siewerdsen JH
Acad Radiol; 2009 Apr; 16(4):464-76. PubMed ID: 19268859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Digital storage phosphor imaging versus conventional film radiography in CT-documented chest disease.
Schaefer CM; Greene R; Oestmann JW; Hall DA; Llewellyn HJ; McCarthy KA; Pile-Spellman ER; Rubens JR
Radiology; 1990 Jan; 174(1):207-10. PubMed ID: 2294549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Chest imaging with dual-energy subtraction digital tomosynthesis.
Sone S; Kasuga T; Sakai F; Hirano H; Kubo K; Morimoto M; Takemura K; Hosoba M
Acta Radiol; 1993 Jul; 34(4):346-50. PubMed ID: 8318295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Experimental evaluation of a portable indirect flat-panel detector for the pediatric chest: comparison with storage phosphor radiography at different exposures by using a chest phantom.
Rapp-Bernhardt U; Bernhardt TM; Lenzen H; Esseling R; Roehl FW; Schiborr M; Theobald-Hormann I; Heindel W
Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):485-91. PubMed ID: 16170012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Detection of CT-proved pulmonary nodules: comparison of selenium-based digital and conventional screen-film chest radiographs.
Woodard PK; Slone RM; Sagel SS; Fleishman MJ; Gutierrez FR; Reiker GG; Pilgram TK; Jost RG
Radiology; 1998 Dec; 209(3):705-9. PubMed ID: 9844662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Digital chest imaging using a selenium detector. The impact of hard copy size on observer performance: a computed tomography-controlled study.
van Heesewijk HP; van der Graff Y; de Valois JC; Vos JA; Feldberg MA
Invest Radiol; 1997 Jun; 32(6):363-7. PubMed ID: 9179712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Intrathoracic calcifications: radiographic features and differential diagnoses.
Brown K; Mund DF; Aberle DR; Batra P; Young DA
Radiographics; 1994 Nov; 14(6):1247-61. PubMed ID: 7855339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of pulmonary function using breathing chest radiography with a dynamic flat panel detector: primary results in pulmonary diseases.
Tanaka R; Sanada S; Okazaki N; Kobayashi T; Fujimura M; Yasui M; Matsui T; Nakayama K; Nanbu Y; Matsui O
Invest Radiol; 2006 Oct; 41(10):735-45. PubMed ID: 16971797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Simulated pulmonary nodules: detection with dual-energy digital versus conventional radiography.
Niklason LT; Hickey NM; Chakraborty DP; Sabbagh EA; Yester MV; Fraser RG; Barnes GT
Radiology; 1986 Sep; 160(3):589-93. PubMed ID: 3526398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Frequent errors in the interpretation of chest x-ray films].
Vock P
Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1987 Jun; 117(24):928-32. PubMed ID: 3616585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Two K versus 4 K storage phosphor chest radiography: detection performance and image quality.
Koelblinger C; Prokop M; Weber M; Sailer J; Cartes-Zumelzu F; Schaefer-Prokop C
Eur Radiol; 2007 Nov; 17(11):2934-40. PubMed ID: 17492289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Dual-energy digital subtraction chest radiography: technical considerations.
Whitman GJ; Niklason LT; Pandit M; Oliver LC; Atkins EH; Kinnard O; Alexander AH; Weiss MK; Sunku K; Schulze ES; Greene RE
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2002; 31(2):48-62. PubMed ID: 12077573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Small lung cancers: improved detection by use of bone suppression imaging--comparison with dual-energy subtraction chest radiography.
Li F; Engelmann R; Pesce LL; Doi K; Metz CE; Macmahon H
Radiology; 2011 Dec; 261(3):937-49. PubMed ID: 21946054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Evaluation of calcification in pulmonary nodules using bone images obtained with single exposure energy subtraction].
Kobayashi T
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1995 Aug; 55(9):638-45. PubMed ID: 7478948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of dose on image quality in a detector-based dual-exposure, dual-energy system for chest radiography.
Freund T; Fischbach F; Teichgraeber U; Haenninen EL; Eichstaedt H; Felix R; Ricke J
Acta Radiol; 2005 Feb; 46(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 15841739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography for detection of simulated nodules and interstitial disease in a chest phantom.
Kroft LJ; Geleijns J; Mertens BJ; Veldkamp WJ; Zonderland HM; de Roos A
Radiology; 2004 Apr; 231(1):156-63. PubMed ID: 14990807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of an amorphous silicon/cesium iodide flat-panel digital chest radiography system with screen/film and computed radiography systems--a contrast-detail phantom study.
Rong XJ; Shaw CC; Liu X; Lemacks MR; Thompson SK
Med Phys; 2001 Nov; 28(11):2328-35. PubMed ID: 11764040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Advanced multiple beam equalization radiography: receiver operating characteristic comparison with screen-film chest radiography.
Swensen SJ; Aughenbaugh GL; Brown LR; Harms GF; Karsell PR; Gray JE; Ilstrup DM; Hodge DO
Mayo Clin Proc; 1998 Jul; 73(7):636-41. PubMed ID: 9663191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
