271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14627581)
1. Three-dimensional endoluminal CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy): comparison of three commercially available systems.
Pickhardt PJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Dec; 181(6):1599-606. PubMed ID: 14627581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [CT-colonography with the 16-slice CT for the diagnostic evaluation of colorectal neoplasms and inflammatory colon diseases].
Röttgen R; Schröder RJ; Lorenz M; Herbel A; Fischbach F; Herzog H; Lopez-Häninnen E; Gutberlet M; Hoffmann K; Helmig K; Felix R
Rofo; 2003 Oct; 175(10):1384-91. PubMed ID: 14556108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Linear polyp measurement at CT colonography: in vitro and in vivo comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional displays.
Pickhardt PJ; Lee AD; McFarland EG; Taylor AJ
Radiology; 2005 Sep; 236(3):872-8. PubMed ID: 16118167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults.
Pickhardt PJ; Choi JR; Hwang I; Butler JA; Puckett ML; Hildebrandt HA; Wong RK; Nugent PA; Mysliwiec PA; Schindler WR
N Engl J Med; 2003 Dec; 349(23):2191-200. PubMed ID: 14657426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Primary three-dimensional analysis with perspective-filet view versus primary two-dimensional analysis: evaluation of lesion detection by inexperienced readers at computed tomographic colonography in symptomatic patients.
Fisichella VA; Jäderling F; Horvath S; Stotzer PO; Kilander A; Hellström M
Acta Radiol; 2009 Apr; 50(3):244-55. PubMed ID: 19235581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Polyp measurement reliability, accuracy, and discrepancy: optical colonoscopy versus CT colonography with pig colonic specimens.
Park SH; Choi EK; Lee SS; Byeon JS; Jo JY; Kim YH; Lee KH; Ha HK; Han JK
Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):157-64. PubMed ID: 17507724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CT colonoscopy of colorectal neoplasms: two-dimensional and three-dimensional virtual-reality techniques with colonoscopic correlation.
Royster AP; Fenlon HM; Clarke PD; Nunes DP; Ferrucci JT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Nov; 169(5):1237-42. PubMed ID: 9353434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of two 3D MDCT colonography protocols for observation of colorectal polyps.
Yasumoto T; Murakami T; Yamamoto H; Hori M; Iannaccone R; Kim T; Abe H; Kuwabara M; Yamasaki K; Kikkawa N; Arimoto H; Passariello R; Nakamura H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jan; 186(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 16357383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Polyp detection with CT colonography: primary 3D endoluminal analysis versus primary 2D transverse analysis with computer-assisted reader software.
Taylor SA; Halligan S; Slater A; Goh V; Burling DN; Roddie ME; Honeyfield L; McQuillan J; Amin H; Dehmeshki J
Radiology; 2006 Jun; 239(3):759-67. PubMed ID: 16543593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Manual and automated polyp measurement comparison of CT colonography with optical colonoscopy.
Jeong JY; Kim MJ; Kim SS
Acad Radiol; 2008 Feb; 15(2):231-9. PubMed ID: 18206622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic accuracy of translucency rendering to differentiate polyps from pseudopolyps at 3D endoluminal CT colonography: a feasibility study.
Guerrisi A; Marin D; Laghi A; Di Martino M; Iafrate F; Iannaccone R; Catalano C; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2010 Aug; 115(5):758-70. PubMed ID: 20174880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Surface visualization at 3D endoluminal CT colonography: degree of coverage and implications for polyp detection.
Pickhardt PJ; Taylor AJ; Gopal DV
Gastroenterology; 2006 May; 130(6):1582-7. PubMed ID: 16697721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of time-efficient CT colonography with two- and three-dimensional colonic evaluation for detecting colorectal polyps.
Macari M; Milano A; Lavelle M; Berman P; Megibow AJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jun; 174(6):1543-9. PubMed ID: 10845478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Assessment of two different software solutions for the evaluation of CT colonography].
Andersen K; Blondin D; Beck A; Aurich V; Vogt C; Mödder U; Cohnen M
Rofo; 2005 Sep; 177(9):1227-34. PubMed ID: 16123868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Polyp measurement with CT colonography: multiple-reader, multiple-workstation comparison.
Young BM; Fletcher JG; Paulsen SR; Booya F; Johnson CD; Johnson KT; Melton Z; Rodysill D; Mandrekar J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Jan; 188(1):122-9. PubMed ID: 17179354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Translucency rendering in 3D endoluminal CT colonography: a useful tool for increasing polyp specificity and decreasing interpretation time.
Pickhardt PJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Aug; 183(2):429-36. PubMed ID: 15269037
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Virtual CT colonoscopy and virtual CT barium enema using multidetector-row CT].
Lee SJ
Korean J Gastroenterol; 2006 Oct; 48(4):233-40. PubMed ID: 17060716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Virtual colon dissection with CT colonography compared with axial interpretation and conventional colonoscopy: preliminary results.
Hoppe H; Quattropani C; Spreng A; Mattich J; Netzer P; Dinkel HP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 May; 182(5):1151-8. PubMed ID: 15100110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of virtual colonoscopy with conventional colonoscopy in detection of colorectal polyps.
Selçuk D; Demirel K; Ozer H; Baca B; Hatemi I; Mihmanli I; Korman U; Oğüt G
Turk J Gastroenterol; 2006 Dec; 17(4):288-93. PubMed ID: 17205408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of axial, coronal, and primary 3D review in MDCT colonography for the detection of small polyps: a phantom study.
Mang T; Schaefer-Prokop C; Schima W; Maier A; Schober E; Mueller-Mang C; Weber M; Prokop M
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 18221849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
