These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14627663)

  • 1. Internal models of target motion: expected dynamics overrides measured kinematics in timing manual interceptions.
    Zago M; Bosco G; Maffei V; Iosa M; Ivanenko YP; Lacquaniti F
    J Neurophysiol; 2004 Apr; 91(4):1620-34. PubMed ID: 14627663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Catching for real and catching for fun in ecological psychology. Focus on "Internal models of target motion: expected dynamics overrides measured kinematics in timing manual interceptions".
    Georgopoulos A
    J Neurophysiol; 2004 Apr; 91(4):1455. PubMed ID: 15010493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual perception and interception of falling objects: a review of evidence for an internal model of gravity.
    Zago M; Lacquaniti F
    J Neural Eng; 2005 Sep; 2(3):S198-208. PubMed ID: 16135884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Internal model of gravity for hand interception: parametric adaptation to zero-gravity visual targets on Earth.
    Zago M; Lacquaniti F
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Aug; 94(2):1346-57. PubMed ID: 15817649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fast adaptation of the internal model of gravity for manual interceptions: evidence for event-dependent learning.
    Zago M; Bosco G; Maffei V; Iosa M; Ivanenko YP; Lacquaniti F
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Feb; 93(2):1055-68. PubMed ID: 15456796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anticipating the effects of gravity when intercepting moving objects: differentiating up and down based on nonvisual cues.
    Senot P; Zago M; Lacquaniti F; McIntyre J
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Dec; 94(6):4471-80. PubMed ID: 16120661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of interception of moving targets by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) in an automated task.
    Iversen IH; Matsuzawa T
    Anim Cogn; 2003 Sep; 6(3):169-83. PubMed ID: 12761656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neural prediction of complex accelerations for object interception.
    de Rugy A; Marinovic W; Wallis G
    J Neurophysiol; 2012 Feb; 107(3):766-71. PubMed ID: 22090456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Processing of targets in smooth or apparent motion along the vertical in the human brain: an fMRI study.
    Maffei V; Macaluso E; Indovina I; Orban G; Lacquaniti F
    J Neurophysiol; 2010 Jan; 103(1):360-70. PubMed ID: 19889846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using visual direction in three-dimensional motion perception.
    Harris JM; Drga VF
    Nat Neurosci; 2005 Feb; 8(2):229-33. PubMed ID: 15665878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. External timing constraints facilitate performance of everyday interceptive actions in children with Spastic Hemiparetic Cerebral Palsy.
    Ricken AX; Savelsbergh GJ; Bennett SJ
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Dec; 410(3):187-92. PubMed ID: 17101219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of environmental context on temporal perception bias in apparent motion.
    Masuda T; Kimura A; Dan I; Wada Y
    Vision Res; 2011 Aug; 51(15):1728-40. PubMed ID: 21704060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Time in motion: effects of whole-body rotatory accelerations on timekeeping processes.
    Binetti N; Siegler IA; Bueti D; Doricchi F
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 May; 48(6):1842-52. PubMed ID: 20227429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Kinematic features of movement tunes perception and action coupling.
    Pozzo T; Papaxanthis C; Petit JL; Schweighofer N; Stucchi N
    Behav Brain Res; 2006 Apr; 169(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 16430976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Internal models and prediction of visual gravitational motion.
    Zago M; McIntyre J; Senot P; Lacquaniti F
    Vision Res; 2008 Jun; 48(14):1532-8. PubMed ID: 18499213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Catching what we can't see: manual interception of occluded fly-ball trajectories.
    Bosco G; Delle Monache S; Lacquaniti F
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e49381. PubMed ID: 23166653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Time-to-contact estimation of accelerated stimuli is based on first-order information.
    Benguigui N; Ripoll H; Broderick MP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Dec; 29(6):1083-101. PubMed ID: 14640832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intercepting free falling objects: better use Occam's razor than internalize Newton's law.
    Baurès R; Benguigui N; Amorim MA; Siegler IA
    Vision Res; 2007 Oct; 47(23):2982-91. PubMed ID: 17884129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prospective versus predictive control in timing of hitting a falling ball.
    Katsumata H; Russell DM
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Feb; 216(4):499-514. PubMed ID: 22120106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual preference for isochronic movement does not necessarily emerge from movement kinematics: a challenge for the motor simulation theory.
    Bidet-Ildei C; Méary D; Orliaguet JP
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Jan; 430(3):236-40. PubMed ID: 18054435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.