These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14628012)

  • 21. Collaborations: investigating international misconduct.
    Boesz C; Lloyd N
    Nature; 2008 Apr; 452(7188):686-7. PubMed ID: 18401384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Meyer case poses a challenge to the system.
    Málaga-Trillo E; Gerlach G
    Nature; 2004 Sep; 431(7008):505. PubMed ID: 15457230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Why fallout from whistleblowing is hard to avoid. Commentary on "The fallout: what happens to whistleblowers and those accused but exonerated of scientific misconduct" (J.S. Lubalin and J.L. Matheson).
    Sieber JE
    Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):255-60. PubMed ID: 11657863
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Defamation, online.
    Nature; 2003 Nov; 426(6962):1. PubMed ID: 14603272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. China introduces 'social' punishments for scientific misconduct.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2018 Dec; 564(7736):312. PubMed ID: 30563974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Harassment should count as scientific misconduct.
    Marín-Spiotta E
    Nature; 2018 May; 557(7704):141. PubMed ID: 29743701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. No constitutional protection for individual researcher's reputation.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2001 Jun; 16(6):8. PubMed ID: 11785528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A record made to be broken.
    Nature; 2013 Apr; 496(7443):5. PubMed ID: 23565534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. In the dark.
    Nature; 2013 Jul; 499(7457):125-6. PubMed ID: 23858536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Research ethics: 3 ways to blow the whistle.
    Yong E; Ledford H; Van Noorden R
    Nature; 2013 Nov; 503(7477):454-7. PubMed ID: 24284713
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Survey reveals mixed feelings over scientific misconduct.
    Abbott A; Graf P
    Nature; 2003 Jul; 424(6945):117. PubMed ID: 12853915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Critical comments threaten to open libel floodgate for physics archive.
    Giles J
    Nature; 2003 Nov; 426(6962):7. PubMed ID: 14603281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Misconduct: lower ranks take most of the blame.
    Clouthier SG
    Nature; 2005 Jul; 436(7050):460. PubMed ID: 16049448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The changing face of scientific misconduct.
    Bevan D
    Clin Invest Med; 2004 Jun; 27(3):117-9. PubMed ID: 15305801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Japan's research conduct.
    Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7077):634. PubMed ID: 16467795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Research: Uncovering misconduct.
    Gewin V
    Nature; 2012 May; 485(7396):137-9. PubMed ID: 22563582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. German task force outraged by changes to science fraud report.
    Schiermeier Q
    Nature; 2002 Jan; 415(6867):3. PubMed ID: 11780073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. PhD--club or history?
    Nature; 2004 Jun; 429(6994):789. PubMed ID: 15215821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Privacy of researchers versus public's right to know their names.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2005 May; 20(5):8. PubMed ID: 16175715
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Swedish research misconduct agency swamped with cases in first year.
    Else H
    Nature; 2021 Sep; 597(7877):461. PubMed ID: 34518694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.