These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14628847)

  • 21. Dangerous patients: an exception to the federal psychotherapist-patient privilege.
    Combs H
    KY Law J; 2002; 91(2):457-76. PubMed ID: 15237517
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The psychotherapist-client testimonial privilege: defining the professional involved.
    Dubbelday CJ
    Emory Law J; 1985; 34(3-4):777-826. PubMed ID: 11658791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. It's been a privilege: advising patients of the Tarasoff duty and its legal consequences for the federal psychotherapist-patient privilege.
    Klinka E
    Fordham Law Rev; 2009 Nov; 78(2):863-931. PubMed ID: 19938380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Limiting the psychotherapist-patient privilege: the therapeutic potential.
    Klotz JA
    Crim Law Bull; 1991; 27(5):416-33. PubMed ID: 16144138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Psychotherapist-patient privilege.
    Slovenko R
    Am J Psychiatry; 1994 Apr; 151(4):626-7. PubMed ID: 8147478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Privilege in the Federal Courts: should there be a "dangerous patient exception"?
    Appelbaum PS
    Psychiatr Serv; 2008 Jul; 59(7):714-6. PubMed ID: 18586984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Waiver of the psychotherapist-patient privilege: implications for child custody litigation.
    Boumil MM; Freitas DF; Freitas CF
    Health Matrix Clevel; 2012; 22(1):1-31. PubMed ID: 22616541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Court responses to Tarasoff statutes.
    Kachigian C; Felthous AR
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(3):263-73. PubMed ID: 15515914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evidence law--the psychotherapist-patient privilege in federal courts.
    Cerveny K; Kent MJ
    Notre Dame Law Rev; 1984; 59(3):791-816. PubMed ID: 11658789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. New York's immediate need for a psychotherapist-patient privilege encompassing psychiatrists, psychologists, and social workers.
    Auerbach RS
    Albany Law Rev; 2006; 69(3):889-912. PubMed ID: 17014064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Smith v. Superior Court.
    California. Court of Appeal
    Wests Calif Report; 1981 Apr; 173():136-42. PubMed ID: 11648501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The psychotherapist as witness for the prosecution: the criminalization of Tarasoff.
    Leong GB; Eth S; Silva JA
    Am J Psychiatry; 1992 Aug; 149(8):1011-5. PubMed ID: 1636800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. In re Rules Adoption Regarding Inmate-Therapist Confidentiality.
    New Jersey. Superior Court, Appellate Division
    Atl Report; 1988 Apr; 540():212-8. PubMed ID: 11648569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Patient-psychotherapist privilege: access to clinical records in the tangled web of repressed memory litigation.
    Loftus EF; Paddock JR; Guernsey TF
    Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1997 Feb; (216):9-54. PubMed ID: 10165197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Toward uniform application of a federal psychotherapist-patient privilege.
    Baytion CM
    Wash Law Rev; 1995 Jan; 70(1):153-75. PubMed ID: 11660174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Privilege Study (Part III): Psychotherapist-patient communications in Canada.
    Shuman DW; Weiner MF; Pinard G
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1986; 9(4):393-429. PubMed ID: 3583523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Privacy, consent, and the electronic mental health record: The Person vs. the System.
    Clemens NA
    J Psychiatr Pract; 2012 Jan; 18(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 22261983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Wrapped in silence: psychotherapists and confidentiality in the courtroom.
    Gutierrez-Lobos K; Wagner E; Schmidl-Mohl B; Scmhid-Siegel B
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2000 Feb; 44(1):33-45. PubMed ID: 11942335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Another courtroom assault on the confidentiality of the psychotherapist-patient relationship.
    Leong GB; Silva JA; Weinstock R
    J Forensic Sci; 1995 Sep; 40(5):862-4. PubMed ID: 7595331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The beginning of the end for the psychotherapist-patient privilege.
    Baumoel J
    Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1992; 60(3):797-826. PubMed ID: 11651632
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.