These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14628854)

  • 1. Stranger in a strange land: the use of overbreadth in abortion jurisprudence.
    Martin K
    Columbia Law Rev; 1999; 99():173-214. PubMed ID: 14628854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Casey undue burden standard: problems predicted and encountered, and the split over the Salerno test.
    Burdick R
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1996; 23():825-76. PubMed ID: 16086482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
    Sayeed SA
    Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Consti-tortion: tort law as an end-run around abortion rights after Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
    Stone AJ
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2000; 8(2):471-515. PubMed ID: 16594110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The legal status of abortion in the states if Roe v. Wade is overruled.
    Linton PB
    Issues Law Med; 2007; 23(1):3-43. PubMed ID: 17703698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Abrogating stare decisis by statute: may Congress remove the precedential effect of Roe and Casey?
    Paulsen MS
    Yale Law J; 2001; 109(7):1535-602. PubMed ID: 16281343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. "Partial-birth abortion" and the Supreme Court.
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 2001 Jan; 344(2):152-6. PubMed ID: 11150367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Winter count: taking stock of abortion rights after Casey and Carhart.
    Borgmann CE
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):675-716. PubMed ID: 16700116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Constitutionalizing Roe, Casey and Carhart: a legislative due-process anti-discrimination principle that gives constitutional content to the "undue burden" standard of review applied to abortion control legislation.
    Van Detta JA
    South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2001; 10(2):211-92. PubMed ID: 16485363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rights talk and its remedies: the jurisprudence of Mary Ann Glendon.
    Hagen JD
    America (NY); 2006 Jan 2-9; 194(1):14-6. PubMed ID: 16459378
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reproductive self-determination in the Third Circuit: the statutory proscription of wrongful birth and wrongful life claims as an unconstitutional violation of Planned Parenthood v. Casey's undue burden standard.
    Intromasso C
    Womens Rights Law Report; 2003; 24(2):101-20. PubMed ID: 15568248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Conforming to the rule of law: when person and human being finally mean the same thing in Fourteenth Amendment jurisprudence.
    Lugosi CI
    Issues Law Med; 2006 Fall-2007 Spring; 22(2-3):119-303. PubMed ID: 17243379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Casey and its impact on abortion regulation.
    Moses MF
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):805-15. PubMed ID: 16700123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The pregnant silence: Rust v. Sullivan, abortion rights, and publicly funded speech.
    Weeks AB
    North Carol Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 70(5):1623-68. PubMed ID: 16044600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scrutiny Land: Scrutiny Land is the place where government needs to justify to a court its restrictions on the liberties of the people.
    Barnett RE
    Mich Law Rev; 2008 Jun; 106(8):1479-500. PubMed ID: 18595211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Why the unconstitutional conditions doctrine is an anachronism (with particular reference to religion, speech, and abortion).
    Sunstein CR
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 1990 Jul; 70(4):593-621. PubMed ID: 15739275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Journey through the courts: minors, abortion and the quest for reproductive fairness.
    Ehrlich JS
    Yale J Law Fem; 1998; 10(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 16596765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lochner redeemed: family privacy after Troxel and Carhart.
    Meyer DD
    UCLA Law Rev; 2001 Jun; 48(5):1125-90. PubMed ID: 16273684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. State constitutional privacy rights post Webster--broader protection against abortion restrictions?
    Ezzard MM
    Denver Univ Law Rev; 1990; 67(3):401-19. PubMed ID: 15999439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minor rights: the adolescent abortion cases.
    Guggenheim M
    Hofstra Law Rev; 2002; 30(3):589-646. PubMed ID: 15212070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.