BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1462958)

  • 1. Evaluation of the CELL-DYN 3000 differential.
    Cornbleet PJ; Myrick D; Judkins S; Levy R
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1992 Dec; 98(6):603-14. PubMed ID: 1462958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the Coulter STKS five-part differential.
    Cornbleet PJ; Myrick D; Levy R
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1993 Jan; 99(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 8422021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An evaluation of the differential from the Abbott CD 3500 in a population of patients with haematological abnormalities.
    Iles-Mann J; Henniker J
    Clin Lab Haematol; 1997 Sep; 19(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 9352144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance and abnormal cell flagging comparisons of three automated blood cell counters: Cell-Dyn Sapphire, DxH-800, and XN-2000.
    Hotton J; Broothaers J; Swaelens C; Cantinieaux B
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2013 Dec; 140(6):845-52. PubMed ID: 24225753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Laboratory evaluation of the Sysmex NE-7000 flagging system; a tool for the recognition of abnormal cells in white cell differentials].
    Kondo S; Yamaguchi N; Imanishi T; Sakota H; Jokei Y; Mituda A
    Rinsho Byori; 1991 Jun; 39(6):615-22. PubMed ID: 1880937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laboratory evaluation of the Abbott Cell DYN 3500 5-part differential.
    Fournier M; Gireau A; Chretien MC; Ghevaert C; Boniface B; Goudemand J; Cosson A
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1996 Mar; 105(3):286-92. PubMed ID: 8602608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Application of receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC) analysis when definitive and suspect morphologic flags appear in the new Coulter LH 750 analyzer.
    Aulesa C; Pastor I; Naranjo D; Galimany R
    Lab Hematol; 2004; 10(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 15070213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Blast flagging of the Sysmex XN-10 hematology analyzer with supervised cell image analysis: Impact on quality parameters.
    Petrone J; Jackups R; Eby CS; Shimer G; Anderson J; Frater JL
    Int J Lab Hematol; 2019 Oct; 41(5):601-606. PubMed ID: 31162809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automated five-part white blood cell differential counts. Efficiency of software-generated white blood cell suspect flags of the hematology analyzers Sysmex SE-9000, Sysmex NE-8000, and Coulter STKS.
    Thalhammer-Scherrer R; Knöbl P; Korninger L; Schwarzinger I
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Jun; 121(6):573-7. PubMed ID: 9199621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Do the flags related to immature granulocytes reported by the Sysmex XE-5000 warrant a microscopic slide review?
    Eilertsen H; Hagve TA
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2014 Oct; 142(4):553-60. PubMed ID: 25239424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance Evaluation of the Mindray BC 6800 Hematology Analyzer and Flag Comparison with the XE-2100 and Manual Microscopy.
    Xiang D; Yue J; Sha C; Ren S; Li M; Wang C
    Clin Lab; 2019 Apr; 65(4):. PubMed ID: 30969092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of four hematology analyzers, CELL-DYN Sapphire, ADVIA 120, Coulter LH 750, and Sysmex XE-2100, in terms of clinical usefulness.
    Kang SH; Kim HK; Ham CK; Lee DS; Cho HI
    Int J Lab Hematol; 2008 Dec; 30(6):480-6. PubMed ID: 19062362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [An evaluation of automated hematology analyzers in detecting abnormal blood cells].
    Tanaka Y; Miyachi H; Kawada T; Ono H; Gondo K; Seki T; Ikeda M; Ando Y
    Rinsho Byori; 1991 Sep; 39(9):961-6. PubMed ID: 1942571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance evaluation of the white cell precursor channel on the Sysmex XN hematology analyzer in HIV specimens.
    Schapkaitz E; Khoza P
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2018 May; 32(4):e22335. PubMed ID: 28948641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multicenter performance evaluation of the Abbott Alinity hq hematology analyzer.
    Slim CL; Wevers BA; Demmers MWHJ; Lakos G; Hoffmann JJML; Adriaansen HJ; Kooren JA; Storm H
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2019 Nov; 57(12):1988-1998. PubMed ID: 31339851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Flow cytometric method for enumeration and classification of reactive immature granulocyte populations.
    Fujimoto H; Sakata T; Hamaguchi Y; Shiga S; Tohyama K; Ichiyama S; Wang FS; Houwen B
    Cytometry; 2000 Dec; 42(6):371-8. PubMed ID: 11135291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the leukocyte differential flags on an hematologic analyzer. The Cobas Argos 5 Diff.
    Lacombe F; Cazaux N; Briais A; Labroille G; Puntous M; Reiffers J; Belloc F; Boisseau MR; Bernard P
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1995 Nov; 104(5):495-502. PubMed ID: 7572808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the automated leucocyte count and differential from the Cell-Dyn 3500 in sickle cell disease.
    Joyner RE; Brooks MJ
    Clin Lab Haematol; 1995 Dec; 17(4):329-33. PubMed ID: 8697728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automated leucocyte differentials in 292 patients with leucopenia: an evaluation of the Abbott CELL-DYN 3500 (CD3500) haematology analyser.
    Burchert-Graeve M; Kock R
    Clin Lab Haematol; 1996 Dec; 18(4):253-9. PubMed ID: 9054698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic performance of the variant lymphocyte flag of the Abbott Cell-Dyn 4000 haematology analyser.
    Hoffmann JJ; Hoedemakers RM
    Clin Lab Haematol; 2004 Feb; 26(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 14738431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.