These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14629691)

  • 21. Crossmodal and incremental perception of audiovisual cues to emotional speech.
    Barkhuysen P; Krahmer E; Swerts M
    Lang Speech; 2010; 53(Pt 1):3-30. PubMed ID: 20415000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Preference for Audiovisual Speech Congruency in Superior Temporal Cortex.
    Lüttke CS; Ekman M; van Gerven MA; de Lange FP
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Jan; 28(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 26351991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Audiovisual integration in the McGurk effect is impervious to music training.
    Lee HH; Groves K; Ripollés P; Carrasco M
    Sci Rep; 2024 Feb; 14(1):3262. PubMed ID: 38332159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Vision of tongue movements bias auditory speech perception.
    D'Ausilio A; Bartoli E; Maffongelli L; Berry JJ; Fadiga L
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Oct; 63():85-91. PubMed ID: 25172391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Gaze behavior in audiovisual speech perception: the influence of ocular fixations on the McGurk effect.
    Paré M; Richler RC; ten Hove M; Munhall KG
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 May; 65(4):553-67. PubMed ID: 12812278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Binding and unbinding the auditory and visual streams in the McGurk effect.
    Nahorna O; Berthommier F; Schwartz JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1061-77. PubMed ID: 22894226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Hearing faces: how the infant brain matches the face it sees with the speech it hears.
    Bristow D; Dehaene-Lambertz G; Mattout J; Soares C; Gliga T; Baillet S; Mangin JF
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 May; 21(5):905-21. PubMed ID: 18702595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Visual contribution to the multistable perception of speech.
    Sato M; Basirat A; Schwartz JL
    Percept Psychophys; 2007 Nov; 69(8):1360-72. PubMed ID: 18078227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The aftereffects of ventriloquism: generalization across sound-frequencies.
    Frissen I; Vroomen J; de Gelder B; Bertelson P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005; 118(1-2):93-100. PubMed ID: 15627411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Audiovisual speech perception in children with developmental language disorder in degraded listening conditions.
    Meronen A; Tiippana K; Westerholm J; Ahonen T
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Feb; 56(1):211-21. PubMed ID: 22653918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Face configuration affects speech perception: Evidence from a McGurk mismatch negativity study.
    Eskelund K; MacDonald EN; Andersen TS
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jan; 66():48-54. PubMed ID: 25447378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The recalibration patterns of perceptual synchrony and multisensory integration after exposure to asynchronous speech.
    Yuan X; Bi C; Yin H; Li B; Huang X
    Neurosci Lett; 2014 May; 569():148-52. PubMed ID: 24704377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A Selective Deficit in Phonetic Recalibration by Text in Developmental Dyslexia.
    Keetels M; Bonte M; Vroomen J
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():710. PubMed ID: 29867675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Electrophysiological evidence for speech-specific audiovisual integration.
    Baart M; Stekelenburg JJ; Vroomen J
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Jan; 53():115-21. PubMed ID: 24291340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of horizontal viewing angle on visual and audiovisual speech recognition.
    Jordan TR; Thomas SM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Dec; 27(6):1386-403. PubMed ID: 11766932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Auditory-visual integration for speech by children with and without specific language impairment.
    Norrix LW; Plante E; Vance R; Boliek CA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Dec; 50(6):1639-51. PubMed ID: 18055778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. McGurk effects in cochlear-implanted deaf subjects.
    Rouger J; Fraysse B; Deguine O; Barone P
    Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 1188():87-99. PubMed ID: 18062941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of a concurrent working memory task and temporal offsets on the integration of auditory and visual speech information.
    Buchan JN; Munhall KG
    Seeing Perceiving; 2012; 25(1):87-106. PubMed ID: 22353570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Recalibration of phonetic categories by lipread speech versus lexical information.
    van Linden S; Vroomen J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1483-94. PubMed ID: 18085958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Variability and stability in the McGurk effect: contributions of participants, stimuli, time, and response type.
    Mallick DB; Magnotti JF; Beauchamp MS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1299-307. PubMed ID: 25802068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.