889 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14631663)
1. An evaluation of an adhesive hydrocellular foam dressing and a self-adherent soft silicone foam dressing in a nursing home setting.
Viamontes L; Temple D; Wytall D; Walker A
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2003 Aug; 49(8):48-52, 54-6, 58. PubMed ID: 14631663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing a foam composite to a hydrocellular foam dressing in the management of venous leg ulcers: a controlled clinical study.
Vanscheidt W; Sibbald RG; Eager CA
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2004 Nov; 50(11):42-55. PubMed ID: 15545697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation study of the properties of two adhesive foam dressings.
Viamontes L; Jones AM
Br J Nurs; 2003 Jun; 12(11 Suppl):S43-4, S46-9. PubMed ID: 12829978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A prospective, randomized, multisite clinical evaluation of a transparent absorbent acrylic dressing and a hydrocolloid dressing in the management of Stage II and shallow Stage III pressure ulcers.
Brown-Etris M; Milne C; Orsted H; Gates JL; Netsch D; Punchello M; Couture N; Albert M; Attrell E; Freyberg J
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2008 Apr; 21(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 18385577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A randomized clinical study comparing a hydrocellular dressing to a hydrocolloid dressing in the management of pressure ulcers.
Seeley J; Jensen JL; Hutcherson J
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1999 Jun; 45(6):39-44, 46-7. PubMed ID: 10655861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of a normothermic dressing on pressure ulcer healing.
Kloth LC; Berman JE; Dumit-Minkel S; Sutton CH; Papanek PE; Wurzel J
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2000; 13(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 11074989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A prospective, randomized clinical trial to assess the cost-effectiveness of a modern foam dressing versus a traditional saline gauze dressing in the treatment of stage II pressure ulcers.
Payne WG; Posnett J; Alvarez O; Brown-Etris M; Jameson G; Wolcott R; Dharma H; Hartwell S; Ochs D
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2009 Feb; 55(2):50-5. PubMed ID: 19246785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A study to compare a new self-adherent soft silicone dressing with a self-adherent polymer dressing in stage II pressure ulcers.
Maume S; Van De Looverbosch D; Heyman H; Romanelli M; Ciangherotti A; Charpin S
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2003 Sep; 49(9):44-51. PubMed ID: 14581709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison of the effectiveness and cost of treatment with humid environment as compared to traditional cure. Clinical trial on primary care patients with venous leg ulcers and pressure ulcers].
Capillas Pérez R; Cabré Aguilar V; Gil Colomé AM; Gaitano García A; Torra i Bou JE
Rev Enferm; 2000 Jan; 23(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 10788945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective, open-label study to assess the clinical performance of a foam dressing in the management of chronic wounds.
Zoellner P; Kapp H; Smola H
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2006 May; 52(5):34-6, 38, 40-2 passim. PubMed ID: 16687768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stage 2 pressure ulcer healing in nursing homes.
Bergstrom N; Smout R; Horn S; Spector W; Hartz A; Limcangco MR
J Am Geriatr Soc; 2008 Jul; 56(7):1252-8. PubMed ID: 18482291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical effectiveness of a silicone foam dressing for the prevention of heel pressure ulcers in critically ill patients: Border II Trial.
Santamaria N; Gerdtz M; Liu W; Rakis S; Sage S; Ng AW; Tudor H; McCann J; Vassiliou T; Morrow F; Smith K; Knott J; Liew D
J Wound Care; 2015 Aug; 24(8):340-5. PubMed ID: 26562376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Treatment of pressure ulcers: results of a study comparing evidence and practice.
Helberg D; Mertens E; Halfens RJ; Dassen T
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2006 Aug; 52(8):60-72. PubMed ID: 16896239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pressure ulcers--randomised controlled trial comparing hydrocolloid and saline gauze dressings.
Chang KW; Alsagoff S; Ong KT; Sim PH
Med J Malaysia; 1998 Dec; 53(4):428-31. PubMed ID: 10971989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [New therapeutic strategies for the treatment of difficult wounds].
Onesti MG; Bitonti A; Fino P; Ciotti M; Scuderi N
G Chir; 2008 May; 29(5):212-20. PubMed ID: 18507956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Factors influencing pressure ulcer healing in adults over 50: an exploratory study.
Jones KR; Fennie K
J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2007 Jul; 8(6):378-87. PubMed ID: 17619036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Simplifying modern wound management for nonprofessional caregivers.
Seaman S; Herbster S; Muglia J; Murray M; Rick C
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2000 Aug; 46(8):18-27. PubMed ID: 11189544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Treatment of chronic skin ulcers in the elderly. Descriptive study on the use of a hydrocellular dressing].
Martínez Cuervo F; Franco Gútiez T; López Rebordinos MT; Menéndez Menéndez S; Rodríguez Rodríguez B
Rev Enferm; 1998 Dec; 21(244):51-60. PubMed ID: 10076470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of wound dressings with soft silicone adhesive technology.
Morris C; Emsley P; Marland E; Meuleneire F; White R
Paediatr Nurs; 2009 Apr; 21(3):38-43. PubMed ID: 19397129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A retrospective data analysis of antimicrobial dressing usage in 3,084 patients.
Fife CE; Carter MJ; Walker D; Thomson B
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2010 Mar; 56(3):28-42. PubMed ID: 20368672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
