These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14632226)
1. The evolution of polyandry: patterns of genotypic variation in female mating frequency, male fertilization success and a test of the sexy-sperm hypothesis. Simmons LW J Evol Biol; 2003 Jul; 16(4):624-34. PubMed ID: 14632226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The genetic basis of traits regulating sperm competition and polyandry: can selection favour the evolution of good- and sexy-sperm? Evans JP; Simmons LW Genetica; 2008 Sep; 134(1):5-19. PubMed ID: 17619174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Maternal effects, but no good or compatible genes for sperm competitiveness in Australian crickets. Dowling DK; Nystrand M; Simmons LW Evolution; 2010 May; 64(5):1257-66. PubMed ID: 20002162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evolution of female multiple mating: A quantitative model of the "sexually selected sperm" hypothesis. Bocedi G; Reid JM Evolution; 2015 Jan; 69(1):39-58. PubMed ID: 25330405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The evolution of polyandry: intrinsic sire effects contribute to embryo viability. García-González F; Simmons LW J Evol Biol; 2005 Jul; 18(4):1097-103. PubMed ID: 16033583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Additive genetic variance in polyandry enables its evolution, but polyandry is unlikely to evolve through sexy or good sperm processes. Travers LM; Simmons LW; Garcia-Gonzalez F J Evol Biol; 2016 May; 29(5):916-28. PubMed ID: 26801640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Female effects, but no intrinsic male effects on paternity outcome in crickets. Simmons LW; Lovegrove M; Almbro M J Evol Biol; 2014 Aug; 27(8):1644-9. PubMed ID: 24836498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can paternal effects via seminal fluid contribute to the evolution of polyandry? Simmons LW; Lovegrove M Biol Lett; 2020 Nov; 16(11):20200680. PubMed ID: 33202182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The relative nature of fertilization success: implications for the study of post-copulatory sexual selection. García-González F BMC Evol Biol; 2008 May; 8():140. PubMed ID: 18474087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inbreeding depression in the competitive fertilization success of male crickets. Simmons LW J Evol Biol; 2011 Feb; 24(2):415-21. PubMed ID: 21091574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Polyandrous females provide sons with more competitive sperm: Support for the sexy-sperm hypothesis in the rattlebox moth (Utetheisa ornatrix). Egan AL; Hook KA; Reeve HK; Iyengar VK Evolution; 2016 Jan; 70(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 26626578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. No support for the sexy-sperm hypothesis in the seed beetle: Sons of monandrous females fare better in post-copulatory competition. Hook KA Ecol Evol; 2018 Dec; 8(23):11742-11753. PubMed ID: 30598772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Male genetic quality and the inequality between paternity success and fertilization success: consequences for studies of sperm competition and the evolution of polyandry. García-González F Evolution; 2008 Jul; 62(7):1653-1665. PubMed ID: 18315573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evolution of ejaculates: patterns of phenotypic and genotypic variation and condition dependence in sperm competition traits. Simmons LW; Kotiaho JS Evolution; 2002 Aug; 56(8):1622-31. PubMed ID: 12353755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The benefits of polyandry in the free-spawning polychaete Galeolaria caespitosa. Marshall DJ; Evans JP J Evol Biol; 2005 May; 18(3):735-41. PubMed ID: 15842502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]