These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14633252)
1. First comparison of productivity and citrate donor load between the Trima version 4 (dual-stage filler) and the Trima Accel (single-stage filler) in the same donors. Ringwald J; Zingsem J; Zimmermann R; Strasser E; Antoon M; Eckstein R Vox Sang; 2003 Nov; 85(4):267-75. PubMed ID: 14633252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the performance of Trima Accel® v5.2 for the collection of concentrated high-dose platelet products and concurrent plasma from high platelet count donors, in Germany. Daskalakis M; Schulz-Huotari C; Burger M; Klink I; Umhau M J Clin Apher; 2012; 27(2):75-80. PubMed ID: 22362609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of plateletpheresis on the Fenwal Amicus, Fresenius COM.TEC, and Trima Accel Cell separators. Keklik M; Eser B; Kaynar L; Sivgin S; Keklik E; Solmaz M; Ozturk A; Buyukoglan R; Yay M; Cetin M; Unal A J Clin Apher; 2015 Jun; 30(3):171-5. PubMed ID: 25230340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of double dose plateletpheresis on the Fenwal Amicus, Fresenius COM.TEC and Trima Accel cell separators. Keklik M; Eser B; Kaynar L; Solmaz M; Ozturk A; Yay M; Birekul A; Oztekin M; Sivgin S; Cetin M; Unal A Transfus Apher Sci; 2014 Oct; 51(2):193-6. PubMed ID: 25219639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effectiveness of the Trima Accel cell separator in the double dose plateletpheresis. Keklik M; Korkmaz S; Kalan U; Sarikoc M; Keklik E Transfus Apher Sci; 2016 Oct; 55(2):240-242. PubMed ID: 27522105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Postdonation platelet counts are safe when collecting platelets with the Trima Accel using a postdonation platelet count target of > or =50,000 platelets/microL. Alex J; Roberts B; Raife T J Clin Apher; 2009; 24(5):215-7. PubMed ID: 19816960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative assessment of single-donor plateletpheresis by Haemonetics Baruah S; Bajpai M Asian J Transfus Sci; 2020; 14(1):23-27. PubMed ID: 33162701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective, paired crossover comparison of multiple, single-needle plateletpheresis procedures with the Amicus and Trima Accel cell separators. Fontana S; Mordasini L; Keller P; Taleghani BM Transfusion; 2006 Nov; 46(11):2004-10. PubMed ID: 17076857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Collection of hyperconcentrated platelets with Trima Accel. Ringwald J; Duerler T; Frankow O; Zimmermann R; Zingsem J; Strasser E; Antoon M; Eckstein R Vox Sang; 2006 Feb; 90(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 16430666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparative study of five plateletpheresis machines in a tertiary care center of India: AmiCORE vs COM.TEC vs Haemonetics MCS+ vs Spectra Optia vs Trima Accel. Arcot PJ; Kumar K; Coshic P; Andriyas V; Mehta V J Clin Apher; 2021 Feb; 36(1):41-47. PubMed ID: 32894894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Plateletpheresis on the Haemonetics and Trima Accel Cell Separators. Keklik M; Keklik E; Kalan U; Ozer O; Arik F; Sarikoc M Ther Apher Dial; 2018 Feb; 22(1):87-90. PubMed ID: 29082642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Frequently used plateletpheresis techniques result in variable target yields and platelet recruitment of donors. Strasser EF; Schuster M; Egler K; Bauer J; Weisbach V; Ringwald J; Zimmermann R; Zingsem J; Eckstein R Transfusion; 2005 May; 45(5):788-97. PubMed ID: 15847670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Paired crossover study of two plateletpheresis systems concerning platelet product quality and donor comfort. Flesch BK; Adamzik I; Steppat D; Miller J; Carstensen L; Schapke M; Davey J Transfusion; 2010 Apr; 50(4):894-901. PubMed ID: 19951314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective comparison of high-dose plateletpheresis with the latest apheresis systems on the same donors. Picker SM; Radojska SM; Gathof BS Transfusion; 2006 Sep; 46(9):1601-8. PubMed ID: 16965590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Frequency of adverse events in plateletpheresis donors in regional transfusion centre in North India. Patidar GK; Sharma RR; Marwaha N Transfus Apher Sci; 2013 Oct; 49(2):244-8. PubMed ID: 23830186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk factors for T-cell lymphopenia in frequent platelet donors: The BEST collaborative study. Kaufman RM; Marks DC; Flamand Y; Acker JP; Brown BL; Olafson C; Marschner S; Pandey S; Papari M; Petraszko T; Serrano K; Ward D; Bazin R; Transfusion; 2023 Nov; 63(11):2072-2082. PubMed ID: 37818894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Paired comparison of Gambro Trima Accel versus Baxter Amicus single-needle plateletpheresis. Burgstaler EA; Winters JL; Pineda AA Transfusion; 2004 Nov; 44(11):1612-20. PubMed ID: 15504167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Plateletpheresis in the Era of Automation: Optimizing Donor Safety and Product Quality Using Modern Apheresis Instruments. Das SS; Sen S; Zaman RU; Biswas RN Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus; 2021 Jan; 37(1):134-139. PubMed ID: 33707846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the automated collection and extended storage of apheresis platelets in additive solution. Johnson L; Winter KM; Hartkopf-Theis T; Reid S; Kwok M; Marks DC Transfusion; 2012 Mar; 52(3):503-9. PubMed ID: 21880041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]