These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14633334)

  • 1. Weak measurement invariance with respect to unmeasured variables: an implication of strict factorial invariance.
    Lubke GH; Dolan CV; Kelderman H; Mellenbergh GJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 Nov; 56(Pt 2):231-48. PubMed ID: 14633334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An essay on measurement and factorial invariance.
    Meredith W; Teresi JA
    Med Care; 2006 Nov; 44(11 Suppl 3):S69-77. PubMed ID: 17060838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sex differences in sum scores may be hard to interpret: the importance of measurement invariance.
    Slof-Op 't Landt MC; Dolan CV; Rebollo-Mesa I; Bartels M; van Furth EF; van Beijsterveldt CE; Meulenbelt I; Slagboom PE; Boomsma DI
    Assessment; 2009 Dec; 16(4):415-23. PubMed ID: 19762518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measurement invariance versus selection invariance: is fair selection possible?
    Borsboom D; Romeijn JW; Wicherts JM
    Psychol Methods; 2008 Jun; 13(2):75-98. PubMed ID: 18557679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Equivalence of a measurement model of cognitive abilities in U.S. standardization and Australian neuroscience samples.
    Bowden SC; Weiss LG; Holdnack JA; Bardenhagen FJ; Cook MJ
    Assessment; 2008 Jun; 15(2):132-44. PubMed ID: 18463404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An examination of psychometric bias due to retesting on cognitive ability tests in selection settings.
    Lievens F; Reeve CL; Heggestad ED
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 Nov; 92(6):1672-82. PubMed ID: 18020804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A note on monotone likelihood ratio of the total score variable in unidimensional item response theory.
    Unlü A
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):179-87. PubMed ID: 17535477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Test of measurement invariance of the FTND across demographic groups: assessment, effect size, and prediction of cessation.
    Johnson EO; Morgan-Lopez AA; Breslau N; Hatsukami DK; Bierut LJ
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2008 Mar; 93(3):260-70. PubMed ID: 18065163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability of multiple-component measuring instruments: improved evaluation in repeated measure designs.
    Raykov T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):119-36. PubMed ID: 17535583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A confirmatory analysis of the factor structure and cross-age invariance of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Third Edition.
    Taub GE; McGrew KS; Witta EL
    Psychol Assess; 2004 Mar; 16(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 15023096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multilevel IRT using dichotomous and polytomous response data.
    Fox JP
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2005 May; 58(Pt 1):145-72. PubMed ID: 15969844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The latent structure of post-traumatic stress disorder: tests of invariance by gender and trauma type.
    Chung H; Breslau N
    Psychol Med; 2008 Apr; 38(4):563-73. PubMed ID: 18325132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The psychometricians' fallacy: too clever by half?
    Michell J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):41-55. PubMed ID: 17908369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Age-related invariance of abilities measured with the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale--III.
    Bowden SC; Weiss LG; Holdnack JA; Lloyd D
    Psychol Assess; 2006 Sep; 18(3):334-9. PubMed ID: 16953736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-mode analysis of multimode covariance matrices.
    Kroonenberg PM; Oort FJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 Nov; 56(Pt 2):305-35. PubMed ID: 14633338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stereotype threat and group differences in test performance: a question of measurement invariance.
    Wicherts JM; Dolan CV; Hessen DJ
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2005 Nov; 89(5):696-716. PubMed ID: 16351363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence for response bias as a source of error variance in applied assessment.
    McGrath RE; Mitchell M; Kim BH; Hough L
    Psychol Bull; 2010 May; 136(3):450-70. PubMed ID: 20438146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The incremental validity of psychological testing and assessment: conceptual, methodological, and statistical issues.
    Hunsley J; Meyer GJ
    Psychol Assess; 2003 Dec; 15(4):446-55. PubMed ID: 14692841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of nonlinear factor-to-indicator relationships in tests of measurement equivalence.
    Bauer DJ
    Psychol Methods; 2005 Sep; 10(3):305-16. PubMed ID: 16221030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Loglinear representations of multivariate Bernoulli Rasch models.
    Hessen DJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 May; 64(Pt 2):337-54. PubMed ID: 21492137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.