BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14634319)

  • 1. Is the SOGS an accurate measure of pathological gambling among children, adolescents and adults?
    Ladouceur R; Bouchard C; Rhéaume N; Jacques C; Ferland F; Leblond J; Walker M
    J Gambl Stud; 2000; 16(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 14634319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability, validity, and cut scores of the south oaks gambling screen (SOGS) for Chinese.
    Tang CS; Wu AM; Tang JY; Yan EC
    J Gambl Stud; 2010 Mar; 26(1):145-58. PubMed ID: 19680794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparisons between the South Oaks Gambling Screen and a DSM-IV-based interview in a community survey of problem gambling.
    Cox BJ; Enns MW; Michaud V
    Can J Psychiatry; 2004 Apr; 49(4):258-64. PubMed ID: 15147024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. DSM-IV and the South Oaks Gambling Screen: diagnosing and assessing pathological gambling in Turkey.
    Duvarci I; Varan A; Coşkunol H; Ersoy MA
    J Gambl Stud; 1997; 13(3):193-206. PubMed ID: 12913386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Problem and probable pathological gambling among older adults assessed by the SOGS-R.
    Wiebe JM; Cox BJ
    J Gambl Stud; 2005; 21(2):205-21. PubMed ID: 15870987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Psychometric Properties of the South Oaks Gambling Screen Revised for Adolescents in Chinese Adolescent Gamblers.
    Zhou H; Chen JH; Ling H; Tong KK; Wu AMS
    Int J Public Health; 2022; 67():1605182. PubMed ID: 36466009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Romanian National Prevalence Study - problem and pathological gambling in children and adolescents.
    Lupu V; Lupu IR
    Clujul Med; 2018 Oct; 91(4):435-440. PubMed ID: 30564020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gambling problems among Lebanese adults: Arabic-Language version of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS) scale validation and correlates.
    Haddad P; Roukoz R; Akel M; Hallit S
    BMC Psychol; 2022 Feb; 10(1):18. PubMed ID: 35105378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Potential and probable pathological gamblers: Where do the differences lie?
    Dubé D; Freeston MH; Ladouceur R
    J Gambl Stud; 1996 Dec; 12(4):419-30. PubMed ID: 24234160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS).
    Stinchfield R
    Addict Behav; 2002; 27(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 11800216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Association between posttreatment gambling behavior and harm in pathological gamblers.
    Weinstock J; Ledgerwood DM; Petry NM
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2007 Jun; 21(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 17563138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using the Rasch model to evaluate the South Oaks Gambling Screen for use with nonpathological gamblers.
    Strong DR; Breen RB; Lesieur HR; Lejuez CW
    Addict Behav; 2003 Oct; 28(8):1465-72. PubMed ID: 14512069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The SOGS-RA vs. the MAGS-7: prevalence estimates and classification congruence.
    Langhinrichsen-Rohling J; Rohling ML; Rohde P; Seeley JR
    J Gambl Stud; 2004; 20(3):259-81. PubMed ID: 15353924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The suitability of the South Oaks Gambling Screen-Revised for Adolescents (SOGS-RA) as a screening tool: IRT-based evidence.
    Chiesi F; Donati MA; Galli S; Primi C
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2013 Mar; 27(1):287-93. PubMed ID: 23025708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An assessment of the validity and reliability of the SOGS-RA.
    Poulin C
    J Gambl Stud; 2002; 18(1):67-93. PubMed ID: 12050848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Problem and probable pathological gambling: considerations from a community survey.
    Cox BJ; Kwong J; Michaud V; Enns MW
    Can J Psychiatry; 2000 Aug; 45(6):548-53. PubMed ID: 10986573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Empirical measures vs. perceived gambling severity among youth: why adolescent problem gamblers fail to seek treatment.
    Hardoon K; Derevensky JL; Gupta R
    Addict Behav; 2003 Jul; 28(5):933-46. PubMed ID: 12788266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Concordance between the SOGS-RA and the DSM-IV criteria for pathological gambling among youth.
    Ladouceur R; Ferland F; Poulin C; Vitaro F; Wiebe J
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2005 Sep; 19(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 16187805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Problem Gambling Within a Chinese Speaking Community.
    Blaszczynski A; Huynh S; Dumlao VJ; Farrell E
    J Gambl Stud; 1998; 14(4):359-380. PubMed ID: 12766446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The South Oaks Gambling Screen Revised for Adolescents (SOGS-RA): further psychometric findings from a community sample.
    Wiebe JM; Cox BJ; Mehmel BG
    J Gambl Stud; 2000; 16(2-3):275-88. PubMed ID: 14634316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.