393 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14634378)
1. Retrograde intrarenal lithotripsy outcome after failure of shock wave lithotripsy.
Stav K; Cooper A; Zisman A; Leibovici D; Lindner A; Siegel YI
J Urol; 2003 Dec; 170(6 Pt 1):2198-201. PubMed ID: 14634378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Retrograde ureteropyeloscopic treatment of 2 cm. or greater upper urinary tract and minor Staghorn calculi.
Grasso M; Conlin M; Bagley D
J Urol; 1998 Aug; 160(2):346-51. PubMed ID: 9679874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Retrograde intrarenal stone surgery for extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy-resistant kidney stones.
Jung H; Nørby B; Osther PJ
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2006; 40(5):380-4. PubMed ID: 17060084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureterorenoscope with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for treating large proximal ureteral stones.
Wu CF; Shee JJ; Lin WY; Lin CL; Chen CS
J Urol; 2004 Nov; 172(5 Pt 1):1899-902. PubMed ID: 15540749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for multiple unilateral intrarenal stones.
Breda A; Ogunyemi O; Leppert JT; Schulam PG
Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1190-6. PubMed ID: 18571315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Initial experience in clinical application of thulium laser contact lithotripsy for transurethral treatment of urolithiasis].
Martov AG; Ergakov DV; Guseinov MA; Andronov AS; Dutov SV; Vinnichenko VA; Kovalenko AA
Urologiia; 2018 Mar; (1):112-120. PubMed ID: 29634144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness and efficiency of shockwave lithotripsy vs flexible ureteroscopic holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser lithotripsy in the treatment of lower pole renal calculi.
Koo V; Young M; Thompson T; Duggan B
BJU Int; 2011 Dec; 108(11):1913-6. PubMed ID: 21453346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ureteropyeloscopic treatment of large, complex intrarenal and proximal ureteral calculi.
Cohen J; Cohen S; Grasso M
BJU Int; 2013 Mar; 111(3 Pt B):E127-31. PubMed ID: 22757752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A new nomogram for prediction of outcome of pediatric shock-wave lithotripsy.
Dogan HS; Altan M; Citamak B; Bozaci AC; Karabulut E; Tekgul S
J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):84.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25812469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Management of lower pole renal calculi: shock wave lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopy.
Preminger GM
Urol Res; 2006 Apr; 34(2):108-11. PubMed ID: 16463145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Flexible ureterorenoscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy for the management of renal stone burdens that measure 2 to 3 cm: a multi-institutional experience.
Hyams ES; Munver R; Bird VG; Uberoi J; Shah O
J Endourol; 2010 Oct; 24(10):1583-8. PubMed ID: 20629566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the Efficacy of Ultra-Mini PCNL, Flexible Ureteroscopy, and Shock Wave Lithotripsy on the Treatment of 1-2 cm Lower Pole Renal Calculi.
Zhang H; Hong TY; Li G; Jiang N; Hu C; Cui X; Chu C; Zhao JL
Urol Int; 2019; 102(2):153-159. PubMed ID: 30352443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The success of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) in treating moderate-sized (10-20 mm) renal stones.
Chung VY; Turney BW
Urolithiasis; 2016 Oct; 44(5):441-4. PubMed ID: 26743071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole stones of 10-20 mm.
El-Nahas AR; Ibrahim HM; Youssef RF; Sheir KZ
BJU Int; 2012 Sep; 110(6):898-902. PubMed ID: 22372915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Combined retrograde flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy with holmium YAG laser for renal calculi associated with ipsilateral ureteral stones.
Cocuzza M; Colombo JR; Ganpule A; Turna B; Cocuzza A; Dhawan D; Santos B; Mazzucchi E; Srougi M; Desai M; Desai M
J Endourol; 2009 Feb; 23(2):253-7. PubMed ID: 19187015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for single intrarenal stones 2 cm or greater--is this the new frontier?
Breda A; Ogunyemi O; Leppert JT; Lam JS; Schulam PG
J Urol; 2008 Mar; 179(3):981-4. PubMed ID: 18207179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Prospective Randomized Comparison Between Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Flexible Ureterorenoscopy for Lower Caliceal Stones ≤2 cm: A Single-Center Experience.
Kumar A; Vasudeva P; Nanda B; Kumar N; Das MK; Jha SK
J Endourol; 2015 May; 29(5):575-9. PubMed ID: 25203489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of caliceal pelvic anatomy on stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy for pediatric lower pole stones.
Onal B; Demirkesen O; Tansu N; Kalkan M; Altintaş R; Yalçin V
J Urol; 2004 Sep; 172(3):1082-6. PubMed ID: 15311043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Endoscopic lithotripsy and the FREDDY laser: initial experience.
Dubosq F; Pasqui F; Girard F; Beley S; Lesaux N; Gattegno B; Thibault P; Traxer O
J Endourol; 2006 May; 20(5):296-9. PubMed ID: 16724897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Versus Flexible Ureteroscopy for the Management of Upper Tract Urinary Stones in Children.
Freton L; Peyronnet B; Arnaud A; Tondut L; Hascoet J; Pradère B; Verhoest G; Habonimana É; Azzis O; Fremond B; Bensalah K
J Endourol; 2017 Jan; 31(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 27824261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
