These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1463566)

  • 1. [Various uncomfortable loudness thresholds, their correlation and use in general practice].
    Brügel FJ; Schorn K
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1992 Nov; 71(11):572-5. PubMed ID: 1463566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Structural changes in the auditory field in relation to age].
    Hellbrück J
    Z Gerontol; 1988; 21(3):146-9. PubMed ID: 3407285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Loudness scaling. A procedure for quantitative recruitment detection].
    Kiessling J; Schubert M; Wagner I
    HNO; 1994 Jun; 42(6):350-7. PubMed ID: 8071095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acoustic reflex threshold and loudness discomfort.
    Al-Azazi MF; Othman BM
    Saudi Med J; 2000 Mar; 21(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 11533793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comfortable loudness level: stimulus effects, long-term reliability, and predictability.
    Cox RM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Dec; 32(4):816-28. PubMed ID: 2601312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Vibrant Sound Bridge System. A new kind hearing prosthesis for patients with sensorineural hearing loss. 2. Audiological results].
    Lenarz T; Weber BP; Issing PR; Gnadeberg D; Ambjørnsen K; Mack KF; Winter M
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2001 Jul; 80(7):370-80. PubMed ID: 11488147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relationship between pure-tone and speech loudness discomfort levels among hearing-impaired subjects.
    Beattie RC; Boyd RL
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1986 May; 51(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 3702359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fitting range of the BAHA Cordelle.
    Bosman AJ; Snik AF; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Aug; 45(8):429-37. PubMed ID: 17005485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical applications of selected binaural effects.
    Noffsinger D
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 15():157-65. PubMed ID: 6955923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Audiological evaluation of affected members from a Dutch DFNA8/12 (TECTA) family.
    Plantinga RF; Cremers CW; Huygen PL; Kunst HP; Bosman AJ
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2007 Mar; 8(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 17136632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the relations of intensity jnd's to loudness and neural noise.
    Zwislocki JJ; Jordan HN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Mar; 79(3):772-80. PubMed ID: 3958318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Relation between comfortable loudness and maximal speech intelligibility in children with sensorineural hearing loss].
    Belov IM; Kuks EN; Poliakova SK
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1992; (3):6-9. PubMed ID: 1523777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Relation between pure tone audiometry and speech audiometry in various hearing-impaired listeners].
    He LP
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1993; 28(1):29-31, 59. PubMed ID: 8352994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Recruitment detection--a comparison of category loudness scaling and classical supra-threshold audiometry].
    Kiessling J; Pfreimer C; Schubert M
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Jan; 75(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 8851113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting. IV. Fitting hearing aids with multi-channel compression so as to restore 'normal' loudness for speech at different levels.
    Moore BC
    Br J Audiol; 2000 Jun; 34(3):165-77. PubMed ID: 10905450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contribution of high frequencies to speech recognition in quiet and noise in listeners with varying degrees of high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Amos NE; Humes LE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):819-34. PubMed ID: 17675588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Loudness discomfort level for speech: comparison of two instructional sets for saturation sound pressure level selection.
    Beattie RC; Svihovec DA; Carmen RE; Kunkel HA
    Ear Hear; 1980; 1(4):197-205. PubMed ID: 7409356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. High-level psychophysical tuning curves: simultaneous masking by pure tones and 100-Hz-wide noise bands.
    Nelson DA; Fortune TW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Apr; 34(2):360-73. PubMed ID: 2046360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.