150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14636751)
1. Validation of an objective scar pigmentation measurement by using a spectrocolorimeter.
Li-Tsang CW; Lau JC; Liu SK
Burns; 2003 Dec; 29(8):779-84. PubMed ID: 14636751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A validation study of scar vascularity and pigmentation assessment using dermoscopy.
Wei Y; Li-Tsang CWP; Luk DCK; Tan T; Zhang W; Chiu TW
Burns; 2015 Dec; 41(8):1717-1723. PubMed ID: 26071080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Application of tissue ultrasound palpation system (TUPS) in objective scar evaluation.
Lau JC; Li-Tsang CW; Zheng YP
Burns; 2005 Jun; 31(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 15896506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability of scar assessments performed with an integrated skin testing device - the DermaLab Combo(®).
Gankande TU; Duke JM; Danielsen PL; DeJong HM; Wood FM; Wallace HJ
Burns; 2014 Dec; 40(8):1521-9. PubMed ID: 24630817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Investigating the intra- and inter-rater reliability of a panel of subjective and objective burn scar measurement tools.
Lee KC; Bamford A; Gardiner F; Agovino A; Ter Horst B; Bishop J; Sitch A; Grover L; Logan A; Moiemen NS
Burns; 2019 Sep; 45(6):1311-1324. PubMed ID: 31327551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Scarbase Duo(®): Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability and validity of a compact dual scar assessment tool.
Fell M; Meirte J; Anthonissen M; Maertens K; Pleat J; Moortgat P
Burns; 2016 Mar; 42(2):336-44. PubMed ID: 26774602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The recovery of post-burn hypertrophic scar in a monitored pressure therapy intervention programme and the timing of intervention.
Li P; Li-Tsang CWP; Deng X; Wang X; Wang H; Zhang Y; Tan Z; He C
Burns; 2018 Sep; 44(6):1451-1467. PubMed ID: 29887351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prevalence of hypertrophic scar formation and its characteristics among the Chinese population.
Li-Tsang CW; Lau JC; Chan CC
Burns; 2005 Aug; 31(5):610-6. PubMed ID: 15993306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Burns objective scar scale (BOSS): Validation of an objective measurement devices based burn scar scale panel.
Lee KC; Bamford A; Gardiner F; Agovino A; Ter Horst B; Bishop J; Grover L; Logan A; Moiemen N
Burns; 2020 Feb; 46(1):110-120. PubMed ID: 31708256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A modified Vancouver Scar Scale linked with TBSA (mVSS-TBSA): Inter-rater reliability of an innovative burn scar assessment method.
Gankande TU; Wood FM; Edgar DW; Duke JM; DeJong HM; Henderson AE; Wallace HJ
Burns; 2013 Sep; 39(6):1142-9. PubMed ID: 23433706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative measurement of hypertrophic scar: interrater reliability and concurrent validity.
Nedelec B; Correa JA; Rachelska G; Armour A; LaSalle L
J Burn Care Res; 2008; 29(3):501-11. PubMed ID: 18388576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Objective color measurements: clinimetric performance of three devices on normal skin and scar tissue.
van der Wal M; Bloemen M; Verhaegen P; Tuinebreijer W; de Vet H; van Zuijlen P; Middelkoop E
J Burn Care Res; 2013; 34(3):e187-94. PubMed ID: 23237819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interpretation of the DermaLab Combo® pigmentation and vascularity measurements in burn scar assessment: an exploratory analysis.
Gankande TU; Duke JM; Wood FM; Wallace HJ
Burns; 2015 Sep; 41(6):1176-85. PubMed ID: 25703660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measurements of scar properties by SkinFibroMeter
Seo SR; Kang NO; Yoon MS; Lee HJ; Kim DH
Skin Res Technol; 2017 Aug; 23(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 27796064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantitative measurement of hypertrophic scar: intrarater reliability, sensitivity, and specificity.
Nedelec B; Correa JA; Rachelska G; Armour A; LaSalle L
J Burn Care Res; 2008; 29(3):489-500. PubMed ID: 18388577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability of photographic analysis in determining change in scar appearance.
Crowe JM; Simpson K; Johnson W; Allen J
J Burn Care Rehabil; 1998; 19(2):183-6. PubMed ID: 9556325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Standardized assessment of breast cancer surgical scars integrating the Vancouver Scar Scale, Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire, and patients' perspectives.
Truong PT; Abnousi F; Yong CM; Hayashi A; Runkel JA; Phillips T; Olivotto IA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Oct; 116(5):1291-9. PubMed ID: 16217470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Colour evaluation in scars: tristimulus colorimeter, narrow-band simple reflectance meter or subjective evaluation?
Draaijers LJ; Tempelman FR; Botman YA; Kreis RW; Middelkoop E; van Zuijlen PP
Burns; 2004 Mar; 30(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 15019115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Clinical comparative study of pulsed dye laser and ultra-pulsed fractional carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of hypertrophic scars after burns].
Li N; Yang L; Cheng J; Han JT; Hu DH
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi; 2018 Sep; 34(9):603-607. PubMed ID: 30293363
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Direct comparison of reproducibility and reliability in quantitative assessments of burn scar properties.
Baumann ME; DeBruler DM; Blackstone BN; Coffey RA; Boyce ST; Supp DM; Bailey JK; Powell HM
Burns; 2021 Mar; 47(2):466-478. PubMed ID: 32839037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
