BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1463706)

  • 1. An easily removable ceramic bracket?
    Fox NA; McCabe JF
    Br J Orthod; 1992 Nov; 19(4):305-9. PubMed ID: 1463706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the debonding characteristics of two innovative ceramic bracket designs.
    Bishara SE; Olsen ME; VonWald L; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jul; 116(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 10393585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the shear bond strength of different ceramic bracket base designs.
    Olsen ME; Bishara SE; Jakobsen JR
    Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(3):179-82. PubMed ID: 9188961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of debonding characteristics of a new collapsible ceramic bracket.
    Bishara SE; Olsen ME; Von Wald L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Nov; 112(5):552-9. PubMed ID: 9387843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bond strengths and debonding characteristics of two types of polycrystalline ceramic brackets.
    Lemke K; Xu X; Hagan JL; Armbruster PC; Ballard RW
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 Nov; 26(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 21175022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro comparison of the retention capacity of new aesthetic brackets.
    Fernandez L; Canut JA
    Eur J Orthod; 1999 Feb; 21(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 10191580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the bond strength of different bracket-bonding systems to bovine enamel.
    Nkenke E; Hirschfelder U; Martus P; Eberhard H
    Eur J Orthod; 1997 Jun; 19(3):259-70. PubMed ID: 9239956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of different bonding and debonding techniques on debonding ceramic orthodontic brackets.
    Sinha PK; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Aug; 112(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 9267223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The extent of enamel surface fractures. A quantitative comparison of thermally debonded ceramic and mechanically debonded metal brackets by energy dispersive micro- and image-analysis.
    Stratmann U; Schaarschmidt K; Wegener H; Ehmer U
    Eur J Orthod; 1996 Dec; 18(6):655-62. PubMed ID: 9009430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of light-cured filled sealant on shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
    Varlik SK; Ulusoy C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 19201326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of Diode Laser Debonding of Ceramic Brackets on Enamel Surface and Pulpal Temperature.
    Yassaei S; Soleimanian A; Nik ZE
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Apr; 16(4):270-4. PubMed ID: 26067728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Shear bond resistance and enamel surface comparison after the bonding and debonding of ceramic and metallic brackets.
    da Rocha JM; Gravina MA; da Silva Campos MJ; Quintão CC; Elias CN; Vitral RW
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 24713563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of failure characteristics and bond strength after ceramic and polycarbonate bracket debonding: effect of bracket base silanization.
    Ozcan M; Finnema K; Ybema A
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 18209212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Shear bond strength of ceramic brackets with chemical or mechanical retention.
    Forsberg CM; Hagberg C
    Br J Orthod; 1992 Aug; 19(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 1390574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Debonding forces applied to ceramic brackets simulating clinical conditions.
    Bishara SE; Forrseca JM; Fehr DE; Boyer DB
    Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(4):277-82. PubMed ID: 7978522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Changes in the enamel after in vitro debonding of brackets bonded with a modified glass ionomer cement].
    Sorel O; el Alam R; Chagneau F; Cathelineau G
    Orthod Fr; 2000 Apr; 71(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 10916640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative evaluation of ceramic bracket base designs.
    Bordeaux JM; Moore RN; Bagby MD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Jun; 105(6):552-60. PubMed ID: 8198079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Shear bond strength of metallic and ceramic brackets using color change adhesives.
    Stumpf Ade S; Bergmann C; Prietsch JR; Vicenzi J
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(2):76-80. PubMed ID: 23916435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Debonding characteristics of a polymer mesh base ceramic bracket bonded with two different conditioning methods.
    Elekdag-Turk S; Isci D; Ozkalayci N; Turk T
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Feb; 31(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 19164413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Physical and adhesive properties of dental enamel after radiotherapy and bonding of metal and ceramic brackets.
    Santin GC; Palma-Dibb RG; Romano FL; de Oliveira HF; Nelson Filho P; de Queiroz AM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Aug; 148(2):283-92. PubMed ID: 26232837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.