188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1463706)
21. Bond strengths of five different ceramic brackets: an in vitro study.
Winchester LJ
Eur J Orthod; 1991 Aug; 13(4):293-305. PubMed ID: 1915618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Enamel loss following ceramic bracket debonding: A quantitative analysis in vitro.
Suliman SN; Trojan TM; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A
Angle Orthod; 2015 Jul; 85(4):651-6. PubMed ID: 25264580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparisons of shear bond strength of precoated and uncoated brackets.
Bishara SE; Olsen M; Von Wald L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Dec; 112(6):617-21. PubMed ID: 9423693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Bond strength: a comparison between chemical coated and mechanical interlock bases of ceramic and metal brackets.
Wang WN; Meng CL; Tarng TH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Apr; 111(4):374-81. PubMed ID: 9109582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Er:YAG Laser for Metal and Ceramic Bracket Debonding: An In Vitro Study on Intrapulpal Temperature, SEM, and EDS Analysis.
Grzech-Leśniak K; Matys J; Żmuda-Stawowiak D; Mroczka K; Dominiak M; Brugnera Junior A; Gruber R; Romanos GE; Sculean A
Photomed Laser Surg; 2018 Nov; 36(11):595-600. PubMed ID: 29905504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. An in vitro evaluation of a metal reinforced orthodontic ceramic bracket.
Mundstock KS; Sadowsky PL; Lacefield W; Bae S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Dec; 116(6):635-41. PubMed ID: 10587597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effects of different debonding techniques on the debonding forces and failure modes of ceramic brackets in simulated clinical set-ups.
Chen HY; Su MZ; Chang HF; Chen YJ; Lan WH; Lin CP
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):680-6. PubMed ID: 18005844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of debonding characteristics of metal and ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel: an in-vitro study.
Habibi M; Nik TH; Hooshmand T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):675-9. PubMed ID: 18005843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effects of modifying the bonding protocol on the shear bond strength of metallic and ceramic orthodontic brackets.
Fernandes TM; Janson G; Somensi J; Pinzan A; Francisconi PA; Sathler R; Henriques JF
Gen Dent; 2012; 60(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 22313980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The effect of enamel bleaching on the shear bond strengths of metal and ceramic brackets.
Oztaş E; Bağdelen G; Kiliçoğlu H; Ulukapi H; Aydin I
Eur J Orthod; 2012 Apr; 34(2):232-7. PubMed ID: 21262931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Ceramic bracket bonding: a comparison of shear, tensile, and torsional bond strengths of ceramic brackets.
Merrill SW; Oesterle LJ; Hermesch CB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Sep; 106(3):290-7. PubMed ID: 8074094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A comparison of shear bond strengths between new and recycled ceramic brackets.
Lew KK; Chew CL; Lee KW
Eur J Orthod; 1991 Aug; 13(4):306-10. PubMed ID: 1915619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The use of debonding pliers in the removal of ceramic brackets: force levels and enamel cracks.
Bishara SE; Fonseca JM; Boyer DB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Sep; 108(3):242-8. PubMed ID: 7661139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Alternatives to ceramic brackets: the tensile bond strengths of two aesthetic brackets compared ex vivo with stainless steel foil-mesh bracket bases.
Arici S; Regan D
Br J Orthod; 1997 May; 24(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 9218111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Bond strength of aged composites found in brackets placed by an indirect technique.
Shiau JY; Rasmussen ST; Phelps AE; Enlow DH; Wolf GR
Angle Orthod; 1993; 63(3):213-20. PubMed ID: 8214790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of varying etching times on the bond strength of ceramic brackets.
Olsen ME; Bishara SE; Boyer DB; Jakobsen JR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Apr; 109(4):403-9. PubMed ID: 8638582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of the debonding characteristics of 2 ceramic brackets: an in vitro study.
Theodorakopoulou LP; Sadowsky PL; Jacobson A; Lacefield W
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Mar; 125(3):329-36. PubMed ID: 15014410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Thermal debonding of ceramic brackets: an in vitro study.
Crooks M; Hood J; Harkness M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Feb; 111(2):163-72. PubMed ID: 9057616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Electrothermal debonding of ceramic brackets: an ex vivo study.
Kearns HP; Sandham JA; Bryan Jones W; Lagerström L
Br J Orthod; 1997 Aug; 24(3):237-42. PubMed ID: 9313918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. In vitro peel/shear bond strength evaluation of orthodontic bracket base design.
Willems G; Carels CE; Verbeke G
J Dent; 1997; 25(3-4):271-8. PubMed ID: 9175357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
