These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1463706)

  • 41. Particulate production during debonding of fixed appliances: Laboratory investigation and randomized clinical trial to assess the effect of using flash-free ceramic brackets.
    Vig P; Atack NE; Sandy JR; Sherriff M; Ireland AJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Jun; 155(6):767-778. PubMed ID: 31153497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparison of bond strength between simple foil mesh and laser-structured base retention brackets.
    Sorel O; El Alam R; Chagneau F; Cathelineau G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Sep; 122(3):260-6. PubMed ID: 12226606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
    Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Shear bond strengths produced by composite and compomer light cured orthodontic adhesives.
    Rock WP; Abdullah MS
    J Dent; 1997; 25(3-4):243-9. PubMed ID: 9175353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Debonding and adhesive remnant cleanup: an in vitro comparison of bond quality, adhesive remnant cleanup, and orthodontic acceptance of a flash-free product.
    Grünheid T; Sudit GN; Larson BE
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Oct; 37(5):497-502. PubMed ID: 25548144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Shear/peel bond strength of repositioned ceramic brackets.
    Gaffey PG; Major PW; Glover K; Grace M; Koehler JR
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(5):351-7. PubMed ID: 8526294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Clinical characteristics and properties of ceramic brackets: A comprehensive review.
    Karamouzos A; Athanasiou AE; Papadopoulos MA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Jul; 112(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 9228839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The force levels required to mechanically debond ceramic brackets: an in vitro comparative study.
    Arici S; Minors C
    Eur J Orthod; 2000 Jun; 22(3):327-34. PubMed ID: 10920565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effect of the different debonding strength of metal and ceramic brackets on the degree of enamel microcrack healing.
    Nimplod P; Tansalarak R; Sornsuwan T
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2021; 26(3):e2119177. PubMed ID: 34190770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparison of shear bond strength of three bonding agents with metal and ceramic brackets.
    Haydar B; Sarikaya S; Cehreli ZC
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):457-62. PubMed ID: 10515144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Combinations of etchants, composite resins, and bracket systems: an important choice in orthodontic bonding procedures.
    Urabe H; Rossouw PE; Titley KC; Yamin C
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Jun; 69(3):267-75. PubMed ID: 10371434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Quantitative analysis of enamel on debonded orthodontic brackets.
    Cochrane NJ; Lo TWG; Adams GG; Schneider PM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Sep; 152(3):312-319. PubMed ID: 28863911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Laser-aided debonding of orthodontic ceramic brackets.
    Strobl K; Bahns TL; Willham L; Bishara SE; Stwalley WC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Feb; 101(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 1531397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Plasma arc curing of ceramic brackets: an evaluation of shear bond strength and debonding characteristics.
    Klocke A; Korbmacher HM; Huck LG; Ghosh J; Kahl-Nieke B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Sep; 124(3):309-15. PubMed ID: 12970665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Evaluation of frictional forces of polycarbonate self-ligating brackets.
    Fernandes DJ; Miguel JA; Quintão CC; Elias CN
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 20877734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Enamel cracks and ceramic bracket failure during debonding in vitro.
    Bishara SE; Ostby AW; Laffoon J; Warren JJ
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Nov; 78(6):1078-83. PubMed ID: 18947289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The effect of tooth bleaching on the enamel surface and the tensile force to debond orthodontic brackets.
    Mishima FD; Valentim RG; Araújo MT; Ruellas AC; Sant'Anna EF
    J Orthod; 2009 Dec; 36(4):236-42. PubMed ID: 19934241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Bond strength and debonding characteristics of a new ceramic bracket.
    Liu JK; Chung CH; Chang CY; Shieh DB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):761-5; quiz 802. PubMed ID: 16360918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Shear bond strength of rebonded mechanically retentive ceramic brackets.
    Chung CH; Friedman SD; Mante FK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Sep; 122(3):282-7. PubMed ID: 12226610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.