These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14638445)

  • 1. Diagnosing tests: using and misusing diagnostic and screening tests.
    Streiner DL
    J Pers Assess; 2003 Dec; 81(3):209-19. PubMed ID: 14638445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Guidelines for reporting information in studies of diagnostic test accuracy: the STARD initiative.
    Meyer GJ
    J Pers Assess; 2003 Dec; 81(3):191-3. PubMed ID: 14638443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving the diagnosis of bipolar disorder: predictive value of screening tests.
    Phelps JR; Ghaemi SN
    J Affect Disord; 2006 Jun; 92(2-3):141-8. PubMed ID: 16529822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating validity of screening tests.
    Larson E
    Nurs Res; 1986; 35(3):186-8. PubMed ID: 3635057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Screening for disease: making evidence-based choices.
    Fields MM; Chevlen E
    Clin J Oncol Nurs; 2006 Feb; 10(1):73-6. PubMed ID: 16482730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The periodic health examination: a useless test?].
    Roland M; Jamoulle M
    Rev Med Brux; 1998 Sep; 19(4):A255-62. PubMed ID: 9805954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic accuracy measures.
    Eusebi P
    Cerebrovasc Dis; 2013; 36(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 24135733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The diagnostic utility of multiple-level likelihood ratios.
    Bowden SC; Loring DW
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2009 Sep; 15(5):769-76. PubMed ID: 19635177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The likelihood ratio. An improved measure for reporting and evaluating diagnostic test results.
    Radack KL; Rouan G; Hedges J
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1986 Aug; 110(8):689-93. PubMed ID: 3755325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Predictive values of the usual biologic tests for the detection of human immunodeficiency virus infection. Consequences for screening].
    Grémy F; Salmi LR
    Bull Acad Natl Med; 1995 Feb; 179(2):317-31; discussion 331-3. PubMed ID: 7614061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Systematic reviews in practice. X. Searching, selecting and the methodological assessment of diagnostic evaluation research].
    Devillé WL; Bossuyt PM; de Vet HC; Bezemer PD; Bouter LM; Assendelft WJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Nov; 146(48):2281-4. PubMed ID: 12497754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Evaluation of diagnostic or screening procedures. Validity of tests, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values. Definition and indications for mass screening].
    Durand-Zaleski I; Bastuji-Garin S
    Rev Prat; 2000 May; 50(10):1155-8. PubMed ID: 10905104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability of diagnostic tests.
    Gjørup T
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl; 1997; 166():9-14. PubMed ID: 9253371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Design and analysis of a study on reliability and validity of diagnostic tests in urological clinical research].
    Fernández Pérez C; Moreno Sierra J; Barreales Tolosa L; Ramírez de Molina V
    Arch Esp Urol; 2003; 56(6):645-56. PubMed ID: 12958999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of a sequence of tests.
    Thompson ML
    Biostatistics; 2003 Jul; 4(3):341-51. PubMed ID: 12925502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing the gain in diagnostic performance when combining two diagnostic tests.
    Macaskill P; Walter SD; Irwig L; Franco EL
    Stat Med; 2002 Sep; 21(17):2527-46. PubMed ID: 12205697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. National screening policies in general practice: a case study of routine screening for partner abuse.
    Goodyear-Smith F
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2002; 1(4):197-209. PubMed ID: 14619249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Weighted 2 x 2 kappa coefficients: recommended indices of diagnostic accuracy for evidence-based practice.
    Gilchrist JM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Oct; 62(10):1045-53. PubMed ID: 19278830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A more accurate measure of the false-negative rate of Papanicolaou smear screening is obtained by determining the false-negative rate of the rescreening process.
    Renshaw AA; DiNisco SA; Minter LJ; Cibas ES
    Cancer; 1997 Oct; 81(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 9349513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Relevance of nerve blocks in treating and diagnosing low back pain--is the quality decisive?].
    Hildebrandt J
    Schmerz; 2001 Dec; 15(6):474-83. PubMed ID: 11793154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.